Click here to close

New Message Alert

and maybe safe from having to do a precautionary

and maybe safe from having to do a precautionary

Author: don’t you have to actually Date: 2/17/2024 8:56:01 AM +0/-1 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

hit the bird to do a precautionary

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Birds are attracted TO lights, not repelled by lights +5/-5 Audobon Society research 2/15/2024 7:07:53 AM

Birds are attracted TO lights, not repelled by lights +0/-2 wrong 2/15/2024 9:45:18 AM

so, the study in the planetarium was about large metropolitan lights? +0/-1 or, just lights? 2/15/2024 12:40:55 PM

Birds are attracted TO lights, not repelled by lights +0/-1 Load71 2/15/2024 12:49:43 PM

why pulse lights? What legitimate study shows this as beneficial?? (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 2/15/2024 12:53:12 PM

why pulse lights? What legitimate study shows this as beneficial?? +0/-1 Load71 2/15/2024 1:10:46 PM

Yeah, they sell scare crows too! They will sell anything to anyone. +0/-1 But, what science is behind it?? 2/15/2024 4:27:04 PM

Yeah, they sell scare crows too! They will sell anything to anyone. +1/-1 oldNtired 2/15/2024 4:54:05 PM

Birds are attracted TO lights, not repelled by lights +1/-1 Yyy 2/15/2024 8:59:26 PM

Birds are attracted TO lights, not repelled by lights +0/-1 trust 2/16/2024 2:06:18 PM

What "science"? What studies have been done to show pulse lights (NT) +0/-0 repel birds from impacting aircraft 2/16/2024 9:35:54 PM

Here's a scientific study: +1/-0 Anonymous 2/16/2024 11:26:58 PM

Birds are attracted TO lights, not repelled by lights +2/-0 When 2/17/2024 6:29:03 AM

why do folks post something from someone else and not cite the source? (NT) +0/-1 who said that? what scientific study? 2/17/2024 7:50:51 AM

why do folks post something from someone else and not cite the source? +0/-0 If you don’t 2/17/2024 8:34:26 AM

and maybe safe from having to do a precautionary (NT) +1/-0 from a bird attracted to your lights? 2/17/2024 8:49:59 AM

and maybe safe from having to do a precautionary +0/-1 don’t you have to actually 2/17/2024 8:56:01 AM

right, and turning them off might help to prevent such a thing +0/-1 more then leaving them on 2/17/2024 9:12:05 AM

right, and turning them off might help to prevent such a thing +0/-0 Ridiculous 2/18/2024 5:54:56 PM

So other GA pilots can see them! (NT) +1/-0 Was nothing to do with birds! 2/19/2024 5:36:00 AM

and maybe safe from having to do a precautionary +0/-0 olderendirt 2/17/2024 2:35:42 PM

and maybe safe from having to do a precautionary +0/-0 say wut 2/21/2024 7:55:31 AM

why do folks post something from someone else and not cite the source? +1/-0 Do ur 2/17/2024 4:33:23 PM

why do folks post something from someone else and not cite the source? +1/-0 If only 2/23/2024 11:16:58 AM