|
|
||
|
||
| Author: Check Date: 8/11/2022 11:02:39 AM +1/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window | ||
in to state law concerning compensation required for being restrained for the purpose of responding for work duties. Also, if Part 135 best be looking at whether that is considered duty time - far as I know, it is. |
||
| Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use | ||
|
|
||
|
||
 To be on-call..or not to be on call...
+0/-0 That is the question? 8/5/2022 11:34:29 PM
 To be on-call..or not to be on call...
+1/-0 Check 8/11/2022 11:02:39 AM
|
