|
|
||
|
||
| Author: Agreed... Date: 6/30/2026 5:40:30 PM +1/-2 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window | ||
The contrast is adjustable and a pilot can look at the same graphic with multiple products and have different intensity conclusions. This is well known and why taking a look at a graphical and thinking it's good to go may not be the wisest move. Textual, current, forecast, trending, and WA, WS, WST are all included in the mix. Get it all before you takeoff and update the evaluation in flight. |
||
| Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use | ||
|
|
||
|
||
 Why?
+3/-4 Itchy 6/30/2026 12:23:22 AM
 What time was the RADAR image? (NT)
+1/-1 Anonymous 6/30/2026 12:36:19 AM
And, you sound like a novice pilot who doesn't understand
+0/-2 but I think I do 6/30/2026 11:34:57 AM
What was the TIME that RADAR image generated??
+2/-1 Simple question! 6/30/2026 11:45:45 AM
Funny, FAA* and NOAA* and AOPA* and NWS*
+0/-2 and even Foreflight all discuss RADAR latency in detail 6/30/2026 2:49:37 PM
Funny, FAA* and NOAA* and AOPA* and NWS*
+2/-1 no 6/30/2026 3:09:55 PM
The FBI is not a noun?
+1/-1 Cambridge Dictionary says otherwise! 6/30/2026 3:50:54 PM
Check out the NTSB's Safety Bulletin on RADAR latency
+1/-1 (not the Ntsb) 6/30/2026 3:02:34 PM
What time was the RADAR image?
+0/-3 No... 7/1/2026 6:34:56 AM
Leeeeerroooooooooyyyyyyy (NT)
+2/-2 Jeeeenkins 6/30/2026 10:19:49 AM
Why?
+3/-2 ATFQ 6/30/2026 1:59:15 PM
Why?
+1/-2 Agreed... 6/30/2026 5:40:30 PM
Why?
+2/-1 Been there, Done that. 7/1/2026 10:49:25 AM
|
