|
|
||
|
||
| Author: and even Foreflight all discuss RADAR latency in detail Date: 6/30/2026 2:49:37 PM +0/-1 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window | ||
Seems like a lot of effort to not discuss a concept. You asked "why" at the top of this thread. You can't answer the question as to when the RADAR image you based the "why" on was real time, or some 15 minute old latent image. * not Faa, Noaa, Aopa, Nws even though they are all refer to acronyms used as common nouns. I don't mind you writing them upper or lower case, since it is your preference to do it either way. |
||
| Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use | ||
|
|
||
|
||
 Why?
+3/-3 Itchy 6/30/2026 12:23:22 AM
 What time was the RADAR image? (NT)
+1/-0 Anonymous 6/30/2026 12:36:19 AM
And, you sound like a novice pilot who doesn't understand
+0/-1 but I think I do 6/30/2026 11:34:57 AM
What was the TIME that RADAR image generated??
+1/-1 Simple question! 6/30/2026 11:45:45 AM
Funny, FAA* and NOAA* and AOPA* and NWS*
+0/-1 and even Foreflight all discuss RADAR latency in detail 6/30/2026 2:49:37 PM
Funny, FAA* and NOAA* and AOPA* and NWS*
+2/-0 no 6/30/2026 3:09:55 PM
The FBI is not a noun?
+1/-0 Cambridge Dictionary says otherwise! 6/30/2026 3:50:54 PM
Check out the NTSB's Safety Bulletin on RADAR latency
+1/-0 (not the Ntsb) 6/30/2026 3:02:34 PM
What time was the RADAR image?
+0/-1 No... 7/1/2026 6:34:56 AM
Leeeeerroooooooooyyyyyyy (NT)
+2/-1 Jeeeenkins 6/30/2026 10:19:49 AM
Why?
+3/-1 ATFQ 6/30/2026 1:59:15 PM
Why?
+1/-1 Agreed... 6/30/2026 5:40:30 PM
Why?
+2/-0 Been there, Done that. 7/1/2026 10:49:25 AM
|
