Click here to close
New Message Alert
Reply to Message Original Forum
  Reply To Message - You are NOT logged in
User Name:



Cancel Message and
Return to Message Board



Original Message

Yet another reasonable amount of time passes and still no FAA letter of interpretation showing the FAA sided  with the Union on tail-end Part 91 Reposition flights without medical crewmembers, as the union "president" claimed to have asked for and received.

That's because he never asked for an intepretation of such, but simply puts out bad (inaccurate/misleading) advice regarding such!


There is nothing issued by the Chief Council saying tail-end Part 91 flying is limited to 14-hour of duty!