Original Message

That's what you get when (libbies) confuse scientific consensus, with confirmed peer reviewed science. Part of the scientific process is designing an experiment that confirms your observations, data, and hypothesis. When an experiment does indeed confirm a hypothesis, it is essential that the experiment be duplicatable by others. Otherwise it's not confirmed science. It might not even be science at all. Good examples are all the hysteria that surrounded cold fusion, and cloning. None of it was ever repeated as claimed.