Know of some that occurred Part 91, but not after 14 hr duty period was exceeded.   

Thanks

wut you talking about bro

one time I was so tired that I punched the nurse in the throat but it was an accident

You're not going to find an example because that's not a thing that exists. You just get an extension. You can't just yell Part 91 like it's a get out of jail free card.

Like on a Part 91 tail-end reposition flight that occurred after the 14hr Part 135 duty period elapsed?

Which minute of obligated flying does it suddenly stop being "duty?" When the FAA looks over the records and sees that you clocked in for 15 hours one day and 12 the next you're just gonna say "it's cool bro it was part 91?"

... a pilot was on duty past 14 hours under Part 91 after his Part 135 duty limitation was reached?

Simple question!

do not allow you to fly past 14 but amc sure does! 

Be 15 and a half hours into your duty day and have an incident. The ASI will be happy to hear all about how AMC says it's totally legit man it was just a part 91 leg

it's not part 91. get that out of your head. it's all 135. crew often onboard

they don't let you go past 15 and who gives a sh*t what some faa guy thinks about it. it's already been approved

Must not have been a problem in the first place!

Do you want there to be less rest time or something? Go back to the military if you want r3tarded schedules.

Of course you can get an extension, unexpected circumstances happen. That's the purpose of additional rest times.

If they happen before you fly, then they aren't unexpected circumstances.  They are bad planning!

Like planning based on average flight times.   Average flight times are planning to be late half the time!

thing after 14 may or may not applicable depending on who the med crew works for.  If for the operator and no one else on board, maybe ok.  If the crew works for a hospital, and not the operator, then Pt 91 is not available.  The med crew remain innocent souls for hire in the eyes of the feds

Duty time is duty time, rest is rest, regardless of Part. Any exceedance or shortfall should be reported.

Overflying duty time was once very common in one company. The pilots got tired of it and collectively decided to self-report. The reports started stacking up and the FAA eventually got involved. Funny thing is that the management "prohibited" its pilots from self-reporting after they got spanked. "Clear it with us first." 

The FAA will hold the fiends you work for in higher contempt than you. The fiends you work for know that you need a paycheck and so does the FAA.

this would turn into a duty day and rest thing lol

safety issues

wut

well within the 14 hour duty day, not after on a Part 91 leg

might not be a problem that flight but after only 10 hours rest after a 14 hour day, I'm pretty tired. on nights in the early morning hours, simple tasks can be struggle. 

There's no accidents directly attributable to your illegal flights so what, you want to make duty days longer? Are you an area manager that no one likes so they can't fill your bases and are trying to cut down on the amount of pilots you have to deal with?

Where are you making this up from?   Where are the accidents that show it is a problem?

once it's part 91, I'm ready for another 14

deadhead home!

two non pilots that don't know the regs having an argument about nothing lol

wut reg is that bro. lol you seem upset

you just said it was a regulation. lol

nobody said that 

and

fatigue doesn't exist and does not contribute to accidents

don’t you have anything better to do I’m guessing not 

It should be brought up at the next FAASTeam meeting.

ill have some tacos for dinner

here is one where excessive duty time was determined to be a cause:

https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/104725/pdf

[ Base URL: /carol-repgen ]

</p>

api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateFinalReport/{mKey}/{fileFormat}

api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/{mKey}/{fileFormat}

api/Aviation/ReportMain/GeneratePreliminaryReport/{mKey}/{fileFormat}

api/Aviation/ReportMain/GetSupportedFileOutputFormats

 GET/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GetSupportedFileOutputFormats Returns the list of supported file output formats

ERA22LA145

Docket: https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=104725

The final report says that neither of the two medical crew heard of reported anything.  But, that does not jive with statements they gave.   The NTSB completely dismissed it.

Also, the NTSB totally dismissed the possibility of the crew member in the front seat stowing his NVGs at the very time they were landing on the dolly.   NVG bags/cases have straps that could easily catch switches and flight controls, and that was not addressed.

did putting away goggles have anything to do with it

Quit throwing a false safety flag