| Msg ID: 2823421 |
It was only a matter of time +0/-1
|
| Author:Drone's are so annoying!
6/29/2024 8:48:23 PM |
https://www.wesh.com/article/florida-man-shoots-walmart-delivery-drone/61455015
|
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823428 |
It was only a matter of time +1/-4
|
| Author:HHDD
6/29/2024 9:47:58 PM Reply to: 2823421 |
Drones have as much right to the airspace as any other aircraft. |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823431 |
It was only a matter of time +3/-2
|
| Author:Yeah
6/29/2024 10:35:12 PM Reply to: 2823428 |
and bicycles should occupy traffic lanes. /sarc |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823438 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet (NT) +0/-1
|
| Author:over a residential neighborhood
6/30/2024 8:27:14 AM Reply to: 2823428 |
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823442 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet +0/-1
|
| Author:That depends
6/30/2024 9:30:43 AM Reply to: 2823438 |
On what type of work you're doing. Plenty of Powerline work does just that Although some requires a congested area plan. |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823473 |
Special permits?? Otherwise FAR 91.119 +0/-1
|
| Author:hovering 100ft over someone's house
6/30/2024 2:27:32 PM Reply to: 2823442 |
is at least an undue hazard to that property, even if nobody is home! |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823480 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet +0/-1
|
| Author:that still does not allow you to do
6/30/2024 2:58:07 PM Reply to: 2823442 |
whatever you want |
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823455 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet +2/-1
|
| Author:Sorry
6/30/2024 11:57:36 AM Reply to: 2823438 |
Sure you can. What regulation is violated? |
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823457 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet +1/-1
|
| Author:it could be argued
6/30/2024 12:40:53 PM Reply to: 2823455 |
you were careless and reckless for hovering 100 feet over houses as you would be considered a "hazard to persons or property on the surface". they would be right and you would have to prove you weren't, which would be difficult. |
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823458 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet +1/-2
|
| Author:I do enjoy it when
6/30/2024 12:44:39 PM Reply to: 2823457 |
somebody says you can do something really stupid and dangerous and then argue that it's legal because the constitution doesn't expressly forbid it. "nothing in the costitution or the FAR's says anything about me not hovering over the tops of houses so I'm good!"
|
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823463 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet +0/-1
|
| Author:Hankl
6/30/2024 1:29:23 PM Reply to: 2823457 |
Careless and reckless as a secondary offense cannot be used as a primary offense so keep trying. |
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823464 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet +0/-3
|
| Author:AAAAAA
6/30/2024 1:35:20 PM Reply to: 2823457 |
You really are stupid, the burden of proof is on the FAA to show that you were guilty remember you're innocent until proven guilty, you have to prove nothing. |
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823466 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet +2/-1
|
| Author:wrong
6/30/2024 1:49:12 PM Reply to: 2823464 |
it's not like regular court. you are guilty until you prove your innocence but please go hover over the houses and see how it goes for you. lol |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823467 |
Not actually true. You can't hover a helicopter 100 feet +1/-1
|
| Author:Chbortnik
6/30/2024 1:52:21 PM Reply to: 2823466 |
↑ He's right, you know. |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823474 |
FAR 91.119 (NT) +0/-1
|
| Author:Anonymous
6/30/2024 2:28:02 PM Reply to: 2823455 |
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823475 |
FAR 91.119(d)(1) +0/-1
|
| Author:Thats right
6/30/2024 2:32:26 PM Reply to: 2823474 |
Thats right, 91.119(d)(1) Any altitide you want? |
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823476 |
Before you get to (d), you have can't violate (a) (NT) +0/-1
|
| Author:100' if motor quits is hazardous
6/30/2024 2:35:09 PM Reply to: 2823475 |
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823478 |
Look at 91.905 +0/-1
|
| Author:Hasto
6/30/2024 2:51:22 PM Reply to: 2823476 |
91.905 list regs that can be waivered by the FSDO at any time. I applied for the FAR 91.119 waiver to land my R44 in my backyard in a residential neighborhood and was approved. |
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823479 |
Great, but you didn't get a waiver to hover over my house (NT) +1/-1
|
| Author:or anyone elses, did you?
6/30/2024 2:52:57 PM Reply to: 2823478 |
|
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823508 |
Same one you're violating when they bust you for flying under a bridge (NT) +0/-1
|
| Author:Like any of the big bridges!
6/30/2024 9:57:42 PM Reply to: 2823455 |
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2823559 |
It was only a matter of time +0/-2
|
| Author:In the know
7/2/2024 5:11:50 AM Reply to: 2823421 |
Walmart owns Floriduh |
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index |
