Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2811850 54% vs 14% (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Real unions vs Fake unions!
4/13/2024 7:51:57 PM


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811851 100% verse 0%....Numbers are cool! (NT) +0/-3     
Author:Your post was not
4/13/2024 8:08:11 PM

Reply to: 2811850


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811854 100% verse 0%....Numbers are cool! +2/-1     
Author:Naw
4/13/2024 9:23:58 PM

Reply to: 2811851

His numbers sucked, but the fact unions suck is spot on.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811880 You know who else sucks and what they suck.... +1/-2     
Author:statistics
4/14/2024 9:17:51 AM

Reply to: 2811855

bureau-of-labor-statistics-union-pay-gap-expands-in-2023



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811881 You know who else sucks and what they suck.... +1/-1     
Author:Yeah
4/14/2024 10:07:21 AM

Reply to: 2811880

but of that "extra$" each how much of that salary is given right back to the unions?? I don't believe that was in the stats



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811887 Actually is it. 109 provides that data at every meeting and posts it for (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Every member to see
4/14/2024 12:21:46 PM

Reply to: 2811881


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811895 109 is posting who it writes checks to that are under $10,000 per year? (NT) +0/-1     
Author:I don't think so!
4/14/2024 1:29:45 PM

Reply to: 2811887


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811896 $11,000 for a 2 day EB meeting in Key West +0/-0     
Author:Ruffin it!
4/14/2024 1:37:05 PM

Reply to: 2811887

https://www.reservationcounter.com/hotels/show/601e900/hyatt-key-west-fl/?cid=sem::TPRC::AW::Reservation_Counter_US_South_Florida_Southern_Florida::US_Florida_Key_West_Hyatt_Centric_Key_West_Resort_and_Spa_did-601e900::hyatt%20key%20west%20fl::b&creative=486873178496&device=c&AdPos=&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=hyatt%20key%20west%20fl&utm_campaign=Reservation_Counter_US_South_Florida_Southern_Florida&iv_=__iv_p_1_a_981272534_g_48397121226_w_kwd-381130319167_h_9012128_ii__d_c_v__n_g_c_486873178496_k_hyatt%20key%20west%20fl_m_b_l__t__e__r__vi__&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw_e2wBhAEEiwAyFFFo92zHGFyU8k773zavqmP4V4QPpYwRFw05QuqSJqIsn4Z4em3afE6hxoCeH0QAvD_BwE

 

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811897 Reminds me of Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker's (NT) +1/-1     
Author:Doing the Lords Work ministries!
4/14/2024 1:47:26 PM

Reply to: 2811896


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811949 It was so much fun, remember? After all, you were there. (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Quit trolling bo nerrr boy
4/15/2024 7:29:03 AM

Reply to: 2811897


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811961 the only thing of me that was there was my hard earned money (NT) +0/-0     
Author:paying for your elaborate "vacations "!
4/15/2024 11:34:48 AM

Reply to: 2811949


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811890 You know who else sucks and what they suck.... +0/-0     
Author:Glad union membership is increasing
4/14/2024 1:18:57 PM

Reply to: 2811880

Wow, didn't realize there was an increase in membership since covid. Thats awesome. Its a labor renaissance.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811894 Is that from the same government that is telling us climate change (NT) +0/-3     
Author:is real?
4/14/2024 1:28:11 PM

Reply to: 2811880


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811908 Climate change/global warming is REAL. The question is how much of the  +1/-2     
Author:change is anthropomorphic
4/14/2024 4:11:28 PM

Reply to: 2811894

change is anthropomorphic and how much is a natural cycle



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811910 Climate change/global warming is REAL. The question is how much of the  +0/-2     
Author:How much is Solar?
4/14/2024 4:13:05 PM

Reply to: 2811908

100 and 10%



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811915 The only thing anthropomorphic about it is what's in your head! (NT) +2/-2     
Author:and the manipulation of data sets!
4/14/2024 6:18:22 PM

Reply to: 2811908


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811917 The only thing anthropomorphic about it is what's in your head! +1/-5     
Author:I often
4/14/2024 6:42:15 PM

Reply to: 2811915

Laugh at the idea of Humans believing they are able to have any impact on any of the processes of Earth.  Do you idiots know how big the Earth is?

 

It's like ants thinking they can move mountains.

 

How arrogant for you to think you are a force on par with mother nature. 

 

This world will still be here, long after we are all gone and dust.

 

We thought Dropping nukes on Japan would change things.  Just made them smarter, stronger and now they lead the world in Tech.  The arrogance.

 

We thought we'd ignite the atmosphere and suffocate/kill the planet at los alamos.....The arrogance.

 

We thought we poisoned all of Chernobyl....for the next million years......Wildlife there is thriving....The arrogance.

 

We are but ants on a world that does not even notice we exist.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811944 How Dare You? +1/-1     
Author:Big Money
4/14/2024 11:18:45 PM

Reply to: 2811917

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55n-Zdv_Bwc

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811948 The only thing anthropomorphic about it is what's in your head! +0/-2     
Author:how to maga
4/15/2024 6:45:09 AM

Reply to: 2811917

dropping nuclear bombs on japan made the japanese smarter lol



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812073 Technically, yes! It ended imperialism in Japan, made em Capitalists (NT) +0/-0     
Author:and now they thrive!
4/17/2024 8:03:21 AM

Reply to: 2811948


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812076 Technically, yes! It ended imperialism in Japan, made em Capitalists +0/-0     
Author:say wut
4/17/2024 8:14:13 AM

Reply to: 2812073

the maga brain is quite amazing 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812101 Liberals rewriting history! +0/-0     
Author:You'd be speaking Japaneese (or
4/17/2024 1:20:32 PM

Reply to: 2812076

German)



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812102 So, are you saying Japaneese emerged stupider? (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Just trying to understand you position
4/17/2024 1:22:03 PM

Reply to: 2812076


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2811953 Climate change/global warming is REAL. The question is how much of the  +2/-0     
Author:I don’t think anthropomorphic means
4/15/2024 9:26:46 AM

Reply to: 2811908

wut you think it means



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812028 Human imaginary crisises are humans changing (NT) +0/-0     
Author:their environment from reality!
4/16/2024 9:00:49 AM

Reply to: 2811953


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812046 You're correct- I should have said "anthropogenic climate change" +1/-0     
Author:olderendirt
4/16/2024 2:31:07 PM

Reply to: 2811953

There's ample evidence that humanity has contributed to climate change?global warming. "Contributed to" is not the same as "causing".

Natural vs anthropogenic climate change

 

Climate change is any change occurring to the planet's climate either permanently or lasting for long periods of time. It is the cumulative total of two related sources: anthropogenic climate change and natural climate changeAnthropogenic climate change is defined by the human impact on Earth's climate while natural climate change are the natural climate cycles that have been and continue to occur throughout Earth's history.[1]

Natural Climate Change

Earth’s climate has always been driven by the amount of incoming and outgoing energy. Without the influence of humans, the Earth has natural cycles that drive the climate. The major factors contributing to Earth’s natural climate change are determined by the [Axial tilt|Earth's orbit around the sun], the output of energy from our sun, the ocean’s natural cooling and warming cycles and the constant variability in volcanic activity. Another factor to consider are the glacial advances and retreats that occur throughout Earth’s history. In the last 650,000 years, there have been around seven ice ages, the most recent ending around 12,000 years ago.[2] Since then, the Earth has experienced a glacial advance known as the little ice age, which occurred from the 16th century through to the 19th century. However, earth is still in the natural warming process from this glacial advance and many climate change deniers erroneously claim that this is the cause for the current dramatic climate changes. Although natural climate factors have some effect on the current global warming, they are not as drowned out by the human induced factors.[1]

Anthropogenic Climate Change

Human induced climate change is directly linked to the amount of fossil fuels burned, aerosol releases and land alteration from agriculture and deforestation.<sup id="cite_ref-no1_1-2" class="reference">[1] The beginning of the Industrial Revolution shows a major spike in temperature levels and climate influences. The product of fossil fuel burning is the emission of a greenhouse gascarbon dioxide which traps heat. Climate change is generally associated with global warming; however some small areas like the tropical Pacific show that the release of aerosols into the atmosphere the area has actually cooled (or at least warmed much slower than the rest of the world).[3] Figure 2 and 3 below shows the effect of these climate influences.

 
Figure 2: Carbon dioxide levels over the last 400,000 years have stayed below 300 ppm and skyrocketed from 1950's to present.[2] Note the climate changed quite a bit before the industrial revolution. Those changes were natural, the current climate change is largely anthropogenic.

Some noticeable evidence occurring from anthropogenic climate change is the overall sea level rise, temperature rise, melting ice sheets and glaciers, increased extreme events such as hurricanes getting stronger and ocean acidification. The oceans naturally rise as glaciers and snow covers melt, however compared to the last century, the rate of rise in the last decade is approaching twice as much.[2] Figure 3 below shows that the Earth has been warming at a frightening rate for the past few decades, and warming is expected to continue for the rest of the 21st century.

 
Figure 3. Sixty years of global warming.[4]

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812048 You're correct- I should have said "anthropogenic climate change" +0/-2     
Author:well
4/16/2024 3:00:13 PM

Reply to: 2812046

somebody drank the koolaid



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812070 you should have said climate frauds! (NT) +1/-3     
Author:Data manipulation
4/17/2024 7:01:55 AM

Reply to: 2812046


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812115 You're correct- I should have said "anthropogenic climate change" +0/-1     
Author:Shalom
4/17/2024 5:46:51 PM

Reply to: 2812046

What a great example of statistalying!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2812124 Here's your CO2 chart explained better! +0/-1     
Author:Anonymous
4/17/2024 7:24:18 PM

Reply to: 2812046

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGy3lTFpy8s

 



Reply  Return-To-Index