Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2805901 AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours (NT) +4/-1     
Author:Thinning the herd
2/22/2024 3:11:19 PM


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805903 AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours  +0/-4     
Author:that's interesting
2/22/2024 3:12:52 PM

Reply to: 2805901

I'm having tacos for dinner



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805908 AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours  +0/-2     
Author:Topjimmy
2/22/2024 3:46:06 PM

Reply to: 2805903

Pics or it didn't happen.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805914 AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours  +0/-0     
Author:Black Bart
2/22/2024 5:07:37 PM

Reply to: 2805903

We are at a strip club in Dallas. Bitches.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805915 AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours  +0/-0     
Author:Retired
2/22/2024 5:11:05 PM

Reply to: 2805914

FYI had my third bowl movement



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805925 AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours (NT) +0/-0     
Author:AMC Ipens
2/22/2024 5:30:30 PM

Reply to: 2805901


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805926 AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours  +0/-0     
Author:New Bases
2/22/2024 5:31:24 PM

Reply to: 2805925

Air Methods just announced they are opening five new bases every week



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805948 AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours  +1/-0     
Author:Travis county
2/22/2024 8:52:38 PM

Reply to: 2805926
AMC and Travis partnership?


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805979 AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours  +0/-0     
Author:A169
2/23/2024 11:20:16 AM

Reply to: 2805948

I guess the 169 is expensive to run.

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805986 AMC losing more ADM and HBS customers than gaining (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Greenfield is a rebranding joke
2/23/2024 1:24:08 PM

Reply to: 2805979


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805995 AMC losing more ADM and HBS customers than gaining  +0/-0     
Author:say wut
2/23/2024 3:49:29 PM

Reply to: 2805986

wut is being rebranded



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805997 19 bases in 8 months false claim “new “ bases. Contracts LOST and bases (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Moved when kicked out. Not “new”
2/23/2024 4:19:46 PM

Reply to: 2805995


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2805999 19 bases in 8 months false claim “new “ bases. Contracts LOST and bases  +0/-0     
Author:oh
2/23/2024 4:50:35 PM

Reply to: 2805997

that's not rebranding. and I didn't ask permission from the rad to schedule my recurrent. don't cry bro



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806001 19 bases in 8 months false claim “new “ bases. Contracts LOST and bases  +0/-0     
Author:and where are
2/23/2024 5:02:04 PM

Reply to: 2805999

the 19 that closed and where are 5 in the last 24 bro



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806050 "rebranding"? Is that when the certificate holder changes it's DBA (NT) +0/-0     
Author:listed in A001 of it's OPSPECs?
2/24/2024 9:37:09 AM

Reply to: 2805986


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806075 "rebranding"? Is that when the certificate holder changes it's DBA +0/-0     
Author:yeah
2/24/2024 6:04:45 PM

Reply to: 2806050

it's something like that dork lol



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806079 why would you hold out to the public in a name of some other (NT) +0/-0     
Author:non-certificated entity?
2/24/2024 7:30:01 PM

Reply to: 2806075


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806100 why would you hold out to the public in a name of some other +0/-0     
Author:why not
2/25/2024 7:44:00 AM

Reply to: 2806079

mr. life of the party



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806140 OPSPEC A008 +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
2/25/2024 4:41:50 PM

Reply to: 2806100

OPSPEC A008 d.

(4) Use of Other Business Name(s) (DBA).


(a) The certificate holder may not allow or create the circumstances that would enable any
other entity to conduct a flight for compensation or hire under Part 119, 121 or 135 as if that entity
were the certificate holder.


(b) The certificate holder must not operate an aircraft under Part 135 under the legal name
or fictitious name of any other person or entity, unless authorized in operations specification A001 of
these operations specifications. Such authorization does not authorize any person or entity, other than
the certificate holder, to conduct operations under the certificate holder’ s certificate and operations
specifications.


(c) The certificate holder may not allow the use of a fictitious name to obscure the
certificate holder’ s responsibility and accountability to exercise operational control over its flight
operations.

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806195 OPSPEC A008 +0/-0     
Author:sorry satan
2/26/2024 2:40:38 PM

Reply to: 2806140

nobody is interested bro



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806198 There is a reason HAA is a safety hemorrhoid in aviation (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Your answer!
2/26/2024 2:56:40 PM

Reply to: 2806195


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806200 There is a reason HAA is a safety hemorrhoid in aviation +0/-0     
Author:you really live a
2/26/2024 3:43:48 PM

Reply to: 2806198

charmed life bro



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2806209 NTSB doesn't think so. Look at all the special safety rules and regs that (NT) +0/-0     
Author:have been instituted for HAA already
2/26/2024 6:48:05 PM

Reply to: 2806200


Reply  Return-To-Index