Msg ID:
2805901 |
AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours (NT) +4/-1
|
Author:Thinning the herd
2/22/2024 3:11:19 PM
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805903 |
AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours +0/-4
|
Author:that's interesting
2/22/2024 3:12:52 PM
Reply to: 2805901
|
I'm having tacos for dinner |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805908 |
AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours +0/-2
|
Author:Topjimmy
2/22/2024 3:46:06 PM
Reply to: 2805903
|
Pics or it didn't happen. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805914 |
AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours +0/-0
|
Author:Black Bart
2/22/2024 5:07:37 PM
Reply to: 2805903
|
We are at a strip club in Dallas. Bitches. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805915 |
AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours +0/-0
|
Author:Retired
2/22/2024 5:11:05 PM
Reply to: 2805914
|
FYI had my third bowl movement |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805925 |
AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:AMC Ipens
2/22/2024 5:30:30 PM
Reply to: 2805901
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805926 |
AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours +0/-0
|
Author:New Bases
2/22/2024 5:31:24 PM
Reply to: 2805925
|
Air Methods just announced they are opening five new bases every week |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805948 |
AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours +1/-0
|
Author:Travis county
2/22/2024 8:52:38 PM
Reply to: 2805926
|
AMC and Travis partnership? |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805979 |
AMC 5 base closure in 24 hours +0/-0
|
Author:A169
2/23/2024 11:20:16 AM
Reply to: 2805948
|
I guess the 169 is expensive to run.
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805986 |
AMC losing more ADM and HBS customers than gaining (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:Greenfield is a rebranding joke
2/23/2024 1:24:08 PM
Reply to: 2805979
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805995 |
AMC losing more ADM and HBS customers than gaining +0/-0
|
Author:say wut
2/23/2024 3:49:29 PM
Reply to: 2805986
|
wut is being rebranded |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805997 |
19 bases in 8 months false claim “new “ bases. Contracts LOST and bases (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:Moved when kicked out. Not “new”
2/23/2024 4:19:46 PM
Reply to: 2805995
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805999 |
19 bases in 8 months false claim “new “ bases. Contracts LOST and bases +0/-0
|
Author:oh
2/23/2024 4:50:35 PM
Reply to: 2805997
|
that's not rebranding. and I didn't ask permission from the rad to schedule my recurrent. don't cry bro |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806001 |
19 bases in 8 months false claim “new “ bases. Contracts LOST and bases +0/-0
|
Author:and where are
2/23/2024 5:02:04 PM
Reply to: 2805999
|
the 19 that closed and where are 5 in the last 24 bro |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806050 |
"rebranding"? Is that when the certificate holder changes it's DBA (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:listed in A001 of it's OPSPECs?
2/24/2024 9:37:09 AM
Reply to: 2805986
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806075 |
"rebranding"? Is that when the certificate holder changes it's DBA +0/-0
|
Author:yeah
2/24/2024 6:04:45 PM
Reply to: 2806050
|
it's something like that dork lol |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806079 |
why would you hold out to the public in a name of some other (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:non-certificated entity?
2/24/2024 7:30:01 PM
Reply to: 2806075
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806100 |
why would you hold out to the public in a name of some other +0/-0
|
Author:why not
2/25/2024 7:44:00 AM
Reply to: 2806079
|
mr. life of the party |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806140 |
OPSPEC A008 +0/-0
|
Author:Anonymous
2/25/2024 4:41:50 PM
Reply to: 2806100
|
OPSPEC A008 d.
(4) Use of Other Business Name(s) (DBA).
(a) The certificate holder may not allow or create the circumstances that would enable any other entity to conduct a flight for compensation or hire under Part 119, 121 or 135 as if that entity were the certificate holder.
(b) The certificate holder must not operate an aircraft under Part 135 under the legal name or fictitious name of any other person or entity, unless authorized in operations specification A001 of these operations specifications. Such authorization does not authorize any person or entity, other than the certificate holder, to conduct operations under the certificate holder’ s certificate and operations specifications.
(c) The certificate holder may not allow the use of a fictitious name to obscure the certificate holder’ s responsibility and accountability to exercise operational control over its flight operations.
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806195 |
OPSPEC A008 +0/-0
|
Author:sorry satan
2/26/2024 2:40:38 PM
Reply to: 2806140
|
nobody is interested bro |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806198 |
There is a reason HAA is a safety hemorrhoid in aviation (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:Your answer!
2/26/2024 2:56:40 PM
Reply to: 2806195
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806200 |
There is a reason HAA is a safety hemorrhoid in aviation +0/-0
|
Author:you really live a
2/26/2024 3:43:48 PM
Reply to: 2806198
|
charmed life bro |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2806209 |
NTSB doesn't think so. Look at all the special safety rules and regs that (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:have been instituted for HAA already
2/26/2024 6:48:05 PM
Reply to: 2806200
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|