| Msg ID: 2805010 |
according to the FAA, 90% of the bird strikes +0/-1
|
| Author:occur below 3000 AGL.
2/9/2024 10:57:38 AM Reply to: 2805007 |
Those of you that regularly fly above 3000 AGL can continue to criticize. For the rest...STFU' |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2805012 |
conclusion: flying at 1500 or 2000 wouldn't necessarily (NT) +0/-1
|
| Author:have changed a thing here
2/9/2024 11:13:07 AM Reply to: 2805010 |
|
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2805013 |
conclusion: flying at 1500 or 2000 wouldn't necessarily +0/-1
|
| Author:say wut
2/9/2024 11:17:15 AM Reply to: 2805012 |
it wouldn't have happened so that's a change |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2805014 |
If 90% of bird strikes happen below 3000 ft, where do the other 10% happen? (NT) +0/-1
|
| Author:and how many between 1500 & 3000 ft
2/9/2024 11:36:48 AM Reply to: 2805013 |
|
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2805015 |
If 90% of bird strikes happen below 3000 ft, where do the other 10% happen? +0/-1
|
| Author:say wut
2/9/2024 11:51:22 AM Reply to: 2805014 |
I think the other 10 happen above 3000. I did my own research. lol |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2805017 |
Bingo! So, nobody can say that it wouldn't have happened had the pilot +0/-1
|
| Author:flown at 1500.
2/9/2024 11:57:53 AM Reply to: 2805015 |
The guy who claimed that got an F in high school |
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2805020 |
Bingo! So, nobody can say that it wouldn't have happened had the pilot (NT) +0/-1
|
| Author:spruce goose flew at 5 ft Above water
2/9/2024 12:05:26 PM Reply to: 2805017 |
|
 |
Reply Return-To-Index |
