Msg ID:
2805010 |
according to the FAA, 90% of the bird strikes +0/-1
|
Author:occur below 3000 AGL.
2/9/2024 10:57:38 AM
Reply to: 2805007
|
Those of you that regularly fly above 3000 AGL can continue to criticize. For the rest...STFU' |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805012 |
conclusion: flying at 1500 or 2000 wouldn't necessarily (NT) +0/-1
|
Author:have changed a thing here
2/9/2024 11:13:07 AM
Reply to: 2805010
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805013 |
conclusion: flying at 1500 or 2000 wouldn't necessarily +0/-1
|
Author:say wut
2/9/2024 11:17:15 AM
Reply to: 2805012
|
it wouldn't have happened so that's a change |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805014 |
If 90% of bird strikes happen below 3000 ft, where do the other 10% happen? (NT) +0/-1
|
Author:and how many between 1500 & 3000 ft
2/9/2024 11:36:48 AM
Reply to: 2805013
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805015 |
If 90% of bird strikes happen below 3000 ft, where do the other 10% happen? +0/-1
|
Author:say wut
2/9/2024 11:51:22 AM
Reply to: 2805014
|
I think the other 10 happen above 3000. I did my own research. lol |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805017 |
Bingo! So, nobody can say that it wouldn't have happened had the pilot +0/-1
|
Author:flown at 1500.
2/9/2024 11:57:53 AM
Reply to: 2805015
|
The guy who claimed that got an F in high school |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2805020 |
Bingo! So, nobody can say that it wouldn't have happened had the pilot (NT) +0/-1
|
Author:spruce goose flew at 5 ft Above water
2/9/2024 12:05:26 PM
Reply to: 2805017
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|