Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2801551 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +1/-0     
Author:Torque events.
12/22/2023 8:46:43 AM

Are pick up and set downs Tq events ?

Hover auto practice ?

OR only when you go thru ETL ?

 

Whopping 5 hrs on this new GXI  

 

Thanks in advance. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801553 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +0/-2     
Author:what does the manual say
12/22/2023 8:52:32 AM

Reply to: 2801551

do that.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801554 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Fun one at party’s I bet. Smh
12/22/2023 8:58:45 AM

Reply to: 2801553


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801556 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +3/-1     
Author:Other bells
12/22/2023 9:52:11 AM

Reply to: 2801551

On every other bell I've flown a takeoff or external load was a torque event. I've not flown the gxi however.  



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801557 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +0/-1     
Author:nobody
12/22/2023 9:55:35 AM

Reply to: 2801551

Doesnt the GX record events on the flight report that comes on shutdown?



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801558 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +1/-4     
Author:it should now be apparent
12/22/2023 10:06:30 AM

Reply to: 2801557

why you should go to the flight or mx manual and bypass retard central



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801567 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? (NT) +0/-0     
Author:It's only a lot of reading if you do it.
12/22/2023 2:02:23 PM

Reply to: 2801558


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801562 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +4/-1     
Author:from 407 rfm
12/22/2023 11:31:55 AM

Reply to: 2801551









Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801564 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +0/-1     
Author:that appears
12/22/2023 1:33:52 PM

Reply to: 2801562

to be a page out of the eagle 407 conversion manual



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801565 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +3/-0     
Author:from 407 rfm take#2
12/22/2023 1:45:03 PM

Reply to: 2801564




Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801574 What’s their definition of a take off ? MD says ETL. (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Hovering should not be a TO tq Ev
12/22/2023 3:46:31 PM

Reply to: 2801565


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801576 What’s their definition of a take off ? MD says ETL.  +0/-0     
Author:Undefined, but...
12/22/2023 4:00:17 PM

Reply to: 2801574
Torque Event
A significant change in power setting. The types of power setting changes are as follows:
  • A Ground-Air-Ground >(GAG) event (i.e., one takeoff plus the subsequent landing)
  • A load lift, such as a cargo hook lift operation, a water bucket lift operation, or an airborne replenishment of fixed internal or external reservoirs


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801668 Takeoff, eh? You hoser! Ka cook-ooh-ooh, ka cook-ooh- ohh! (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Great White North
12/24/2023 5:35:55 PM

Reply to: 2801576


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801689 12 Days Of Christmas +0/-0     
Author:You hosers!
12/25/2023 11:35:19 AM

Reply to: 2801668

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DTwLqR071M

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801575 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +0/-0     
Author:GXi Maint. Manual
12/22/2023 3:52:26 PM

Reply to: 2801551

From the maintenance manual:

Retirement Index Number (RIN). Components sensitive to operational events, such as torque events or run-on landings, are assigned a maximum RIN number. This number is based on the fatigue damage that results from normal helicopter lifts and takeoffs (torque events) or from run-on landings, whichever applies. New components will begin with an accumulated RIN of zero, which will increase as the helicopter is subjected to torque events or run-on landings. The operator must record the number of torque events or run-on landings, and increase the accumulated RIN as directed. When a component reaches the maximum RIN or retirement flight hours, whichever occurs first, the component must be retired from service
 
 
For every one torque event, you add one RIN to the previous total. A torque event occurs for every takeoff (one takeoff plus the subsequent landing equals one RIN) and every load lift. A load lift (internal or external) may be defined as a sling load, a rescue hoist load or any load that is added to the helicopter while airborne. For example: if an operator performs one takeoff, picks up and drops 10 sling loads, and then lands, he must record 11 torque events.
 
 
For every one run-on landing, you add one RIN to the previous total. A run-on landing is defined as one where there is forward ground travel of the helicopter greater than 3 feet with the weight on the skids.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801577 Maybe bell should say what a take off is. That ETL or that just a hover. (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Poor definition- MD500 must be past ETL.
12/22/2023 4:00:53 PM

Reply to: 2801575


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801580 Maybe bell should say what a take off is. That ETL or that just a hover. (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Poor definition- MD500 must be past ETL.
12/22/2023 5:12:45 PM

Reply to: 2801575


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801586 Maybe bell should say what a take off is. That ETL or that just a hover.  +3/-1     
Author:Bell does define what a
12/22/2023 7:32:37 PM

Reply to: 2801580

torque event is...you just don't agree with it.

Your concurrence isn't relevant to the definition.

DISMISSED!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801585 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +0/-2     
Author:Anonymous
12/22/2023 7:23:13 PM

Reply to: 2801551

The correct answer is, "Who cares?".



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801608 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +0/-0     
Author:oldNtired
12/23/2023 1:21:05 PM

Reply to: 2801585

Back in the early Bell 214 days, when the 214  got into the logging program (most of the old guys know the history) the Bell longhairs (read engineer) went nuts when they found out the number of torque excursions involved in a 1 hr. logging cycle.  It seems Bell had based the aircraft certification on 2 touque excursions per hr. (take 0ff and landing.  I don't remember all the details but it was interesting.  It seems they are re-inventing the wheel.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801612 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +0/-0     
Author:BigT
12/23/2023 2:48:09 PM

Reply to: 2801551

This thread reads like the NFL trying to determine just what is a "catch" and what is not a "catch".  Some things are just apparent. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2801854 Bell guys ? Factory guys ? +0/-0     
Author:Bell Guy
12/29/2023 6:29:44 PM

Reply to: 2801551

Bell guy here.  The definitions presented here from Bell manuals are the correct answers.



Reply  Return-To-Index