Msg ID:
2798838 |
USCG HH60 down in AK +0/-1
|
Author:Correction
11/14/2023 1:36:10 PM
Reply to: 2798837
|
MH60 |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2798844 |
USCG HH60 down in AK +1/-1
|
Author:BigT
11/14/2023 2:51:13 PM
Reply to: 2798838
|
No, HH-60 is fine. That is what it was called before the arm-chair warriers at HQ decided it was some kind of military (as in "attack") aircraft. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2798849 |
MH-60T is an accurate designation! +1/-2
|
Author:Anonymous
11/14/2023 4:44:12 PM
Reply to: 2798844
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1962_United_States_Tri-Service_aircraft_designation_system
The USCG uses this aircraft for multimission operations (SAR, Logistics, PAX, Sling, Law/CounterDrug Enforcement, Border Security....)
It's not just a SAR Helicopter (HH) |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2798876 |
MH-60T is an accurate designation! +2/-1
|
Author:wikipedia is not a factual reference,
11/14/2023 6:49:40 PM
Reply to: 2798849
|
it's a collection of opinions made by people like you. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2798885 |
Wiki edits must conform to the accepted standard models and (NT) +0/-1
|
Author:P.C. norms.
11/14/2023 7:20:33 PM
Reply to: 2798876
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2798883 |
This is an Attack H-60 (NT) +0/-1
|
Author:Blapache.
11/14/2023 7:17:32 PM
Reply to: 2798855
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2798923 |
USCG HH60 down in AK +0/-1
|
Author:Hhg
11/15/2023 11:41:33 AM
Reply to: 2798844
|
Think some were SH-60F airframes... |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2798934 |
USCG HH60 down in AK (NT) +3/-1
|
Author:Too many idiots on this site
11/15/2023 2:01:50 PM
Reply to: 2798837
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2799059 |
those are some tall trees to fall through (NT) +0/-1
|
Author:Anonymous
11/17/2023 12:17:35 AM
Reply to: 2799032
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|