Msg ID:
2789278 |
FAA's Drone ARC (over the horizon) +1/-0
|
Author:Anonymous
7/31/2023 9:52:07 AM
Reply to: 2789273
|
Bro, get a life. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2789282 |
Why you saying that? Drones in your airspace is not important? (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:You are a helicopter operator, yes?
7/31/2023 10:25:39 AM
Reply to: 2789278
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2789287 |
Why you saying that? Drones in your airspace is not important? (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:Nerd alert
7/31/2023 10:44:02 AM
Reply to: 2789282
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2789295 |
Nerd alert? Anyone and everyone who is someone (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:is a listed participant.....
7/31/2023 12:29:57 PM
Reply to: 2789287
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2789327 |
I thought the Local 109 was on that ARC? (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:Guess not
7/31/2023 7:04:05 PM
Reply to: 2789273
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2789367 |
OPEIU had two reps from 109. OPEIU stopped supporting the effort +0/-0
|
Author:Same with Drone committee.
8/1/2023 12:21:22 AM
Reply to: 2789327
|
Another failure by OPEIU. Seems like a trend and 109 is tired of trying to save them and make them relevant. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2789376 |
not what I heard.! and why's 109 still telling everyone they are (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:still on those FAA committees?
8/1/2023 4:27:56 AM
Reply to: 2789367
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2789368 |
After reading the recommendations it’s obvious no actual line pilots were (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:On the ARC. What a joke
8/1/2023 12:22:48 AM
Reply to: 2789273
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|