Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2786261 Part 135 Duty/Rest rules +0/-0     
Author:making something simple complicated!
6/26/2023 1:52:31 PM

Check out this report from the voluntary rulemaking committee working on Part 135 Duty/Rest Rule updates.

https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/committees/documents/index.cfm/document/information/documentID/5803

 

What was a simple uncomplicated concept might become more complicated than an IRS tax code!

 

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786264 Part 135 Duty/Rest rules +0/-0     
Author:None of it matters
6/26/2023 2:15:03 PM

Reply to: 2786261

Operators will take whatever rulemaking occurs and obtain exceptions. Same, same.

Until a number is written that can't be exceeded by anyone, it's just static.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786270 Numbers are already written that can't be exceeded. +0/-1     
Author:they simply need fix definitions
6/26/2023 3:04:11 PM

Reply to: 2786264

There are already well defined numbers in Part 135.

14 hrs of rest in a 24/hr lookback is a hard number.   You cannot plan to exceed it!  Simple.

Rest is ANY work performed by the company!   Well defined by the Chief Council; just need it in definitions!   Far too many attempt to use the FLIGHT ATTENDANT definition rule (135.273) for pilots.   Not applicable!

If you WORK for the company, it is not a "day off".   If you go to training/ground school, it is not a "day off".   If you travel for company, it is not a "day off".   It is duty and needs to be shown on the duty/time logs (accounted for).

You are not limited by 14 hrs of duty, you just can't plan to fly Part 135 flights past that point without seeing 10 of rest in the preceeding 24 hrs.   You can work (be on duty) indefinately after the flying ends.

Part 91 is Part 91!   If they are going to apply duty restrictions to Part 91, then they need impose same restrictions to every Part 91 operation, including all general aviation operations.

 

There is nothing broken with the current Part 135 duty/rest rules except nobody seems to know them or properly operate under them!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786271 Sorry: Duty is ANY work performed by the company! (NT) +1/-0     
Author:Not rest. Mea coupa!
6/26/2023 3:05:45 PM

Reply to: 2786270


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786297 Numbers are already written that can't be exceeded. +0/-0     
Author:I'm hearing...
6/26/2023 7:00:05 PM

Reply to: 2786270

you say that you've never worked for one of these operators...without saying that you've never worked for one of these operators. But you definitely think you got a handle on it.

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786319 Are you saying you work for one of these operators who use (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Flight Attendant duty definitions?
6/27/2023 9:41:52 AM

Reply to: 2786297


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786266 Part 135 Duty/Rest rules +3/-0     
Author:8 hour
6/26/2023 2:27:13 PM

Reply to: 2786261

duty day, 6 hours flying, and 3 crews per 24 hour day.  Simple.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786298 8 to 4 shift, 4 to midnight shift, midnight to 8 shift (NT) +0/-0     
Author:bring it on!
6/26/2023 7:10:35 PM

Reply to: 2786266


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786479 8 to 4 shift, 4 to midnight shift, midnight to 8 shift  +0/-0     
Author:Problem is
6/28/2023 6:51:25 PM

Reply to: 2786298

where are the crews?  Solution:  Who cares, two 8 hour shifts and to heck with 24/7.  Don't need a help ride in the wee hours.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786272 If pilots are using this definition to define a duty period, it is wrong! +1/-0     
Author:FAR 135.273
6/26/2023 3:14:15 PM

Reply to: 2786261

This is not a correct definition for a pilot's duty period:

Duty period means the period of elapsed time between reporting for an assignment involving flight time and release from that assignment by the certificate holder. The time is calculated using either Coordinated Universal Time or local time to reflect the total elapsed time.

That is for a Flight Attendant under FAR 135.273, which is not applicable for Flight Crewmembers (i.e., pilots)

For pilots, ANY work performed by the pilot for the certificate holder is considered duty.  Thus, a duty period is the period of time from when the person began the day working for the company to when that person ended working for the company.   Simple.   Has nothing to do with "an assignment involving flight time".   You are on duty if you are working for the company, whether it is flying, washing the CEOs car, mopping floors, taxxiing to/from a broken helicopter, deadheading on an airline/bus/train/uber/pov/etc travelling to/from a base other than your domicile (assigned base).   It is all duty!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786275 Correct definition of Duty: +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
6/26/2023 3:55:58 PM

Reply to: 2786272

For pilots operating under FAR 135.267, the correct definition of duty is:

 

Duty means actual work for an air carrier, or the present responsibility for work should the occasion arise.

 

https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/faa_migrate/interps/2012/Boyle-IslandAirways_2012_Legal_Interpretation.pdf

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786277 Correct definition of Duty: +0/-0     
Author:but somebody just told me
6/26/2023 4:07:25 PM

Reply to: 2786275

this is simple and uncomplicated and we don't need to mess with it



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786290 It is simple. don't use flight attendant definitions and  +2/-1     
Author:don't plan over 14 hrs Part 135!
6/26/2023 5:20:02 PM

Reply to: 2786277

It's ton's simplier than what the ARC is recommending, and more proper!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786428 It is simple. don't use flight attendant definitions and  +1/-0     
Author:Really?????
6/28/2023 9:50:12 AM

Reply to: 2786290

It's not that simple.

What about when your at home checking weather before you come in, that's a flight duty.

Or when your company mandates you come in early and does not pay you, that's flying duty.

This is why we have an issues, companies abuse, employees try to make it work, and it equals not a good choice.

People abuse this all the time which leads to a lot of accidents, including pilots who should be sleeping or resting on their night shifts, then coming into work tired.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786454 Really!! +1/-0     
Author:Anonymous
6/28/2023 3:10:17 PM

Reply to: 2786428

It's not that simple.

Yes it is!

What about when your at home checking weather before you come in, that's a flight duty.

When you are home checking the weather, if it is part of your offical preflight duties, you are on DUTY!   If it's just to check the weather for youself, then it is not DUTY.   If you are required by the company to check the weather from the house, it is DUTY!   Your duty clock has started and you'll be required to show you've had 10 hrs of REST in the preceeding 24 hours from the reasonably planned completion time of your Part 135 flight.

Or when your company mandates you come in early and does not pay you, that's flying duty.

That's duty also!   Duty is not pay.  Duty is DUTY!   Your pay issue is a matter between you and HR.  The FAA, however, is looking for DUTY TIME.

This is why we have an issues, companies abuse, employees try to make it work, and it equals not a good choice.

Making a super complicated regulation who's flowchart has more turns than a Pac-Man game matrix isn't going to fix your problem!   The current system is very simple and thorough enough.   You, obviously, are just not following it!

People abuse this all the time which leads to a lot of accidents, including pilots who should be sleeping or resting on their night shifts, then coming into work tired.

Stop abusing it then.  You are on DUTY whenever you are working for the company, or have an obligation to respond when called (RESERVE/Beeper or phone calls).   Again, the problem is not the regulation!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786455 Really!! +0/-0     
Author:we can't even agree on
6/28/2023 3:16:51 PM

Reply to: 2786454

whether it's simple or not lol



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786522 it's simple. and the proposed ARC recombination won't (NT) +0/-0     
Author:make it any simpler (especially for you)
6/29/2023 12:16:13 PM

Reply to: 2786455


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786552 it's simple. and the proposed ARC recombination won't  +0/-0     
Author:oh
6/29/2023 7:12:24 PM

Reply to: 2786522

I just looked at the weather 2 hours before my shift starts so I'll be rolling out 2 hours early tomorrow. is that how I do it?



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786578 Why did you look at the weather 2 hrs BEFORE you shift started? (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Was that a requirement by your employer?
6/30/2023 12:48:27 AM

Reply to: 2786552


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786648 Why did you look at the weather 2 hrs BEFORE you shift started? +0/-0     
Author:because
6/30/2023 9:01:26 PM

Reply to: 2786578

I turned on my computer and there it was from last night. should I have slammed it closed or looked away? is there a time limit for looking at wx so it becomes duty? please advise.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786649 So, it wasn't an assigned duty by your company (NT) +0/-0     
Author:just you farting around
6/30/2023 9:27:52 PM

Reply to: 2786648


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786655 So, it wasn't an assigned duty by your company +0/-0     
Author:why
6/30/2023 10:38:45 PM

Reply to: 2786649

are you making this so complicated



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786664 How so? It's pretty easy. You checking wx on your phone at home to see +0/-0     
Author:what kinda night you might have...
7/1/2023 1:48:38 AM

Reply to: 2786655

... is not DUTY.   



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2786482 Really!! +1/-0     
Author:Good
6/28/2023 6:59:38 PM

Reply to: 2786454

post.  Been in this game a very long time.  Fed regs are not all the certificate holder needs deal with Irrespective of the railway act etc.  There are state employment regs too, which spell if you do something for the company by their direction, not just your curiousity, then you are encumbered, on duty, and the time is compensible.



Reply  Return-To-Index