| Msg ID: 2783573 |
Is there an FAA Exemption to FAR 91.17(b) to allow for (NT) +0/-1
|
| Author:intoxicated passengers/patients?
5/23/2023 9:32:58 AM |
|
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2783581 |
Is there an FAA Exemption to FAR 91.17(b) to allow for +2/-1
|
| Author:do anything you want
5/23/2023 1:00:29 PM Reply to: 2783579 |
to meet the extent of an emergency but no more |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2783585 |
What emergency? (NT) +0/-2
|
| Author:Anonymous
5/23/2023 4:03:36 PM Reply to: 2783581 |
|
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2783586 |
What emergency? +1/-1
|
| Author:i.e.
5/23/2023 4:31:08 PM Reply to: 2783585 |
a DUI vehicle victum/patient or any other victum under the influence is what 14 CFR 91.17(b) applies to. Jezz |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2783590 |
Um, that's not how you use emergency authority! (NT) +0/-3
|
| Author:[If you were being serious]
5/23/2023 5:37:42 PM Reply to: 2783586 |
|
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2783599 |
Um, that's not how you use emergency authority! +1/-1
|
| Author:say
5/23/2023 9:14:34 PM Reply to: 2783590 |
wut |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2783601 |
Is there an FAA Exemption to FAR 91.17(b) to allow for +1/-2
|
| Author:Therules
5/23/2023 9:39:08 PM Reply to: 2783581 |
You cannot claim an emergency exsists based on patient on board unless patient condition has changed markedly. You can't pick up an accident victim in critical condition and treat your flight as an emergency. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2783587 |
Is there an FAA Exemption to FAR 91.17(b) to allow for +1/-1
|
| Author:Sid Swiller
5/23/2023 4:42:44 PM Reply to: 2783573 |
Is there an exemption for having a few nips to ease the strain of med crew silliness? |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2783592 |
Is there an FAA Exemption to FAR 91.17(b) to allow for +1/-1
|
| Author:Yeah,
5/23/2023 7:05:52 PM Reply to: 2783587 |
throw firecrackers in to ge break room periodically. Keep 'em sharp, and occasioanally have an "incoming" drill!!! |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2783591 |
Is there an FAA Exemption to FAR 91.17(b) to allow for +0/-1
|
| Author:If a patient
5/23/2023 7:03:06 PM Reply to: 2783573 |
under medical care I'd have no concern. However, on an offshore rig waaaay back in the early 80s a fellow who just arrived offshore and continuing his journey to his final rig destination offshore (a barge) on embarkation literally fell out of the helicopter and finally struggled aboard. Well, ah, no. Had the dispatch offload the helicopter, shutdown, had a word with the tool pusher and told them to sober him up (aka coffee etc., read go through the motions) and convince everyone all is well, and when the perp and all are satisfied, an hour later, off we all went. Only time in 11 years had to exercise the option to democratize the "solution" to the problem. His job, or mine, and we both kept them. Not totally kosher, but common sense, sort of, has to prevail. Fire away all ya mohdeern xphertss!
|
|
|
Return-To-Index |
