| Msg ID: 2779951 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-0
|
| Author:suggestions?
4/17/2023 5:37:14 PM |
Anyone sourced the filters that are talked about? Would rather go this route than pay $15k for a new RA box. Thanks!
|
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2779953 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-0
|
| Author:BigT
4/17/2023 6:12:00 PM Reply to: 2779951 |
The great news is, all this radiation is good for your body!! |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2779955 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +4/-1
|
| Author:This is such a non issue
4/17/2023 6:55:21 PM Reply to: 2779951 |
But the FAA is hell bent on continuing to make it an issue. We've flown literally thousands and thousands of flights since the "5g scare" and no one in our company has even noticed, been affected, or reported any problems. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2779962 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +1/-0
|
| Author:One thing about the FAA and their rules
4/17/2023 9:03:00 PM Reply to: 2779955 |
It's never going away!! |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780105 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-0
|
| Author:You are 100% correct
4/18/2023 8:22:31 PM Reply to: 2779962 |
Government never gets smaller and rules/regulations never go away. |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2779977 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-0
|
| Author:There are fixed wing manufactures
4/18/2023 12:17:55 AM Reply to: 2779951 |
Out there that already have an SB to add filters into the system. Basically it filters out to a smaller frequency input range to a rad alt. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780051 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-0
|
| Author:Anonymous
4/18/2023 10:06:40 AM Reply to: 2779977 |
Source? Reference? |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780057 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +1/-0
|
| Author:Upset
4/18/2023 10:50:02 AM Reply to: 2779951 |
This is so freaking stupid! Let's make the aviation side of things more complicated and expensive adding in filters and more stuff to break when the Gov F'ed up and knew 5G was going to be an issue but then allowed big cell phone to pay the bills and get their way! Makes me furious! |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780083 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +1/-1
|
| Author:Anonymous
4/18/2023 3:53:15 PM Reply to: 2779951 |
get all of it but far as I know the only requirement for relying on a radalt is on Cat II/III approaches. Unless involved in those approaches I'd opt for the cheapest way of compliance probably via filters between the antenna and receiver. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780190 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +1/-0
|
| Author:NVG
4/19/2023 10:29:26 AM Reply to: 2780083 |
RA is required for NVG operations. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780232 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +1/-1
|
| Author: ...and?
4/19/2023 5:34:54 PM Reply to: 2780190 |
What's that got to do with the price of beer in China? |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780264 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-2
|
| Author:uhm well
4/20/2023 2:29:27 AM Reply to: 2780232 |
If you doint get a new RA box or filter, you are no longer legal to do NVG flying. |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780370 |
according to what? what FAR are you violating? (NT) +1/-0
|
| Author:Anonymous
4/21/2023 10:55:44 AM Reply to: 2780264 |
|
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780470 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +1/-0
|
| Author:Yeah,
4/22/2023 9:33:10 AM Reply to: 2780190 |
you're right. Sorry, forgot!! |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780167 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +1/-1
|
| Author:RW vs FW
4/19/2023 7:17:31 AM Reply to: 2779951 |
AD 2022-04-05 Won't let me paste it??🤔😡
|
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780276 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-0
|
| Author:RadAlt
4/20/2023 9:43:15 AM Reply to: 2779951 |
Per Honeywell, they are getting closer but are not quite there yet. Expecting AMOC/Exemption to be extended. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780348 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-0
|
| Author:Honeywell 5G Filters
4/21/2023 12:11:49 AM Reply to: 2780276 |
https://www.seaerospace.com/sales/product/Honeywell/RFF-100 |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780383 |
I would think the telecommunications folks shoul be made +0/-0
|
| Author:to pay all the operators to upgrade
4/21/2023 12:29:29 PM Reply to: 2779951 |
Why is he cost a burden on the aircraft operators when it's the telecommunications companies who are benefiting from the new radio frequency usage? They should be made to pay for it, not the aircraft operators! At least for the upgrades of existing instal. New installations should already have the proper filters built-in.
HAI should lobby for that! |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780753 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-0
|
| Author:New IP Guy
4/25/2023 4:34:57 PM Reply to: 2779951 |
Radar Altimeters are an input into GPWS, EGPWS, TAWS, and HTAWS. There is a troll here who claims that spurious TAWS alarms, cannot lead to nuisance trips, or be detrimental to safety. The poser also claims that such distractions cannot in any way lead to or contribute to an accident. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2780754 |
NPRM for Radar Altimeters +0/-0
|
| Author:crack me up
4/25/2023 4:57:09 PM Reply to: 2780753 |
looks like old hose has been stewing for a while about this lol |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
