| Msg ID: 2767701 |
Part 135 Ops +0/-4
|
| Author:Learner
3/10/2023 2:56:52 PM |
When flying part 135 do you have to comply with part 91? An example would help. Thanks. |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767702 |
Part 135 Ops +2/-2
|
| Author:no
3/10/2023 3:07:59 PM Reply to: 2767701 |
you can do whatever you want |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767703 |
Part 135 Ops +6/-1
|
| Author:Yes
3/10/2023 3:08:33 PM Reply to: 2767701 |
Yes, Part 91 applies to every aircraft. Part 135 also applies to the specific operator. Must comply with all regs that apply to you. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767706 |
Part 135 Ops +0/-2
|
| Author:yeah but
3/10/2023 3:09:41 PM Reply to: 2767703 |
do I have to comply with regs that don't apply to me |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767707 |
Part 135 Ops +0/-0
|
| Author:nope
3/10/2023 3:10:46 PM Reply to: 2767706 |
of course not.
|
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767705 |
Part 135 Ops +4/-1
|
| Author:All
3/10/2023 3:09:35 PM Reply to: 2767701 |
N registered A/C fly under 14 CFR 91. When they have a paying pax that the operator charges i.e. medical personnel then they operate under 14 CFR 135. Tours,135, Off shore 135 |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767708 |
Part 135 Ops +0/-2
|
| Author:paying pax that the operator
3/10/2023 3:11:36 PM Reply to: 2767705 |
charges like medical personel lol wt f |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767710 |
Part 135 Ops +1/-0
|
| Author:Yes
3/10/2023 3:26:41 PM Reply to: 2767708 |
Wilbur if the hospital pays MT,PHI,for tranporting med crew that makes it a 135!! you 🤡 I hope for the safety of ANYONE you are NOT a pilot!!! |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767712 |
Part 135 Ops +0/-1
|
| Author:Dope
3/10/2023 3:44:50 PM Reply to: 2767701 |
14 CFR part 91.409.. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767716 |
Part 135 Ops +1/-0
|
| Author:WT hey
3/10/2023 4:10:45 PM Reply to: 2767712 |
14 CFR 91.409 is Inspection!?!?!?! § 91.409 Inspections |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767725 |
Part 135 Ops +0/-1
|
| Author:Dope
3/10/2023 4:40:03 PM Reply to: 2767716 |
Someone asked for a 91 rule applicable to 135.. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767728 |
Part 135 Ops +1/-0
|
| Author:No
3/10/2023 4:50:54 PM Reply to: 2767725 |
💩 So why the hell would some 🤡 post 91.409 ref Insp.??? Why not 91.411 on recording them too???? |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767731 |
Part 135 Ops +0/-1
|
| Author:I don't know but
3/10/2023 5:04:32 PM Reply to: 2767728 |
I repeat: the 429 has many safety features and none are missing so whoever said they were missing some is flat out wrong lol |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767743 |
Part 135 Ops +1/-0
|
| Author:Dope
3/10/2023 6:32:56 PM Reply to: 2767728 |
91.411 is for altimeter testing... also applicable to 135. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767752 |
Part 135 Ops +1/-0
|
| Author:Again No
3/10/2023 7:17:20 PM Reply to: 2767743 |
💩 SO why bring IN 91. 409 or 91 .4.11???? They guy is ...🤔🤔🤔 |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767753 |
Part 135 Ops +0/-1
|
| Author:Dope
3/10/2023 7:22:42 PM Reply to: 2767752 |
This is why, OP question: When flying part 135 do you have to comply with part 91? An example would help. Thanks. |
 |
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767817 |
Sure, this one is easy +1/-1
|
| Author:Rules Guy
3/11/2023 8:12:06 AM Reply to: 2767701 |
Part 135 does not specifically talk about weather in great detail. However, in Part 91.155 there is a list of weather criteria that pilots must obey in the different types of airspaces in which we operate. Cloud-clearances and stuff. And yes, you still have to comply with those Part 91 bits even if you're operating under Part 135. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767830 |
Sure, this one is easy +0/-0
|
| Author:lol
3/11/2023 10:08:07 AM Reply to: 2767817 |
"I don't have an example but there are weather rules in part 91." Awesome. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767858 |
Sure, this one is easy +0/-0
|
| Author:The Rule Guy
3/11/2023 2:51:09 PM Reply to: 2767830 |
The OP asked if we have to comply with Part 91 when operating under Part 135? Not sure what your problem is, I provided an example: 91.155 that specifies cloud-clearance criteria that are not expressed in Part 135, but we still have to observe and comply with them. So that actually is an example that the OP was asking for. Do you understand how this whole internet forum thing works, or are you just being argumentative for fun (yours)? I've known some pretty slow helicopter pilots in my day - perhaps you're one of them. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767849 |
Part 135 Ops +1/-0
|
| Author:First
3/11/2023 1:16:47 PM Reply to: 2767701 |
must comply with Part 91 at all times, in addition those parts of it amended by Part 135. There. Easy. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
| Msg ID: 2767865 |
Part 135 Ops +0/-1
|
| Author::-)
3/11/2023 3:26:09 PM Reply to: 2767701 |
No. Absolutely not. If you're flying a Part 135 operation, 91 goes right out the window. If this wasn't covered in your orientation or in your GOM, you need to ensure that it this info is shared with the rest of your pilot group (company email or SharePoint is great for this sort of thing). Once you've taken care of that, let your Chief Pilot know you're getting the message out, and see if there's anything he or she might wish to add. |
|
|
Return-To-Index |
