Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2766666 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-15     
Author:Is it the
2/28/2023 9:46:06 AM

A - Flight Nurse

B - Pilot In Command

C - Flight Medic



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766667 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +3/-2     
Author:Genexer
2/28/2023 9:58:46 AM

Reply to: 2766666

Your ex-wife? 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766670 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +19/-1     
Author:No big deal
2/28/2023 10:24:57 AM

Reply to: 2766666

If they say 'No, I logically tell them why we should go, if able. If they still say 'No' we go back to bed or whatever and don't give it another thought. I always document the reason for flight declines should questions be asked later. More often than not no questions are asked, but one time I was asked about a turndown three weeks after it happened and was happy I had notes to refer to. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767401 This is the right answer +0/-0     
Author:document everything
3/7/2023 4:12:31 PM

Reply to: 2766670

If your company doesnt back you, then you are working for the wrong group. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766673 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +5/-1     
Author:Think
2/28/2023 10:58:04 AM

Reply to: 2766666

If one of the three says no, the answer is no.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766680 that wasn't the question (NT) +1/-0     
Author:Anonymous
2/28/2023 11:18:03 AM

Reply to: 2766673


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766677 "... who has the authority to say GO?" B - Pilot In Command, period. +10/-1     
Author:olderendirt
2/28/2023 11:07:23 AM

Reply to: 2766666
§ 91.3 Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command.

(a) The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766681 so, if the pic says GO, he's the final authority? (NT) +1/-2     
Author:Anonymous
2/28/2023 11:19:30 AM

Reply to: 2766677


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766695 so, if the pic says GO, he's the final authority? +4/-0     
Author:Maverick
2/28/2023 12:54:48 PM

Reply to: 2766681

As to being able to make the flight safel, yes. As to saying we are going on this flight, no.

Remember you are a team/crew. The door was opened long ago to make it easy for one to decline a flight for nearly any reason. So people will. If the flight is doable and the pic says let's go, but the nurse says they are not comfortable and says no. You decline the flight for Medcrew and keep notes as another has suggested.

Remember, there will always be another flight.

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766699 so, if the pic says GO, he's the final authority? +5/-1     
Author:olderendirt
2/28/2023 1:21:07 PM

Reply to: 2766681

so, if the pic says GO, he's the final authority?

Yes. The regulation says exactly that. Your contract may say otherwise and you, an employee, must abide by your employer's policy, but- the PIC is the final authority.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766759 hop aboard then, by the power invested in me as you pic (NT) +0/-0     
Author:I say we are a GO!
2/28/2023 8:40:48 PM

Reply to: 2766699


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766682 "... who has the authority to say GO?" B - Pilot In Command, period. +4/-0     
Author:Very
2/28/2023 11:22:05 AM

Reply to: 2766677

old subject.  Just play nice and keep the med crews happy.  They have no authority but if they want to RTB or divert or land or whatever it is the pilot choice to do the safe thing.  Talk about it on the ground.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766683 what if one of the others says NO, does he still have the (NT) +0/-0     
Author:authority to say GO?
2/28/2023 11:24:57 AM

Reply to: 2766682


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766692 what if one of the others says NO, does he still have the  +6/-0     
Author:Ok
2/28/2023 12:45:40 PM

Reply to: 2766683

How about all of you medcal personnel get together and learn how to be better medical staff.  You could use it. stay in your lane. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766700 what if one of the others says NO, does he still have the  +0/-1     
Author:olderendirt
2/28/2023 1:27:24 PM

Reply to: 2766683
§ 91.3 Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command.

(a) The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft.

There it is, the regulation assigning responsibility and authority. A passenger may refuse to board, may have authority to terminate flight activity, but the PIC is by law and reason the person responsible, and is "... the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft."



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766712 So, if one person can say NO, is that final authority if the PIC says YES? (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Anonymous
2/28/2023 3:29:29 PM

Reply to: 2766700


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766737 "... who has the authority to say GO?" B - Pilot In Command, period. +0/-0     
Author:Maverick
2/28/2023 5:45:08 PM

Reply to: 2766682

There you go. End of discussion as that is spot on.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767120 Here, hold my smoothie, watch this: I say NO! (NT) +0/-0     
Author:[PIC can take his GO and stick it]
3/4/2023 11:25:53 AM

Reply to: 2766737


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766688 That doesn’t apply to HAA flights +0/-2     
Author:Operational Control has final authority
2/28/2023 12:12:53 PM

Reply to: 2766677

What has the industry become?



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766694 That doesn’t apply to HAA flights +3/-0     
Author:Seriously bro? lol
2/28/2023 12:48:32 PM

Reply to: 2766688

evenif occ says yes, only the PIC can make it happen. some companies don't even have an occ, chief



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767397 "... who has the authority to say GO?" B - Pilot In Command, period. +0/-0     
Author:been there too many times
3/7/2023 3:54:59 PM

Reply to: 2766677

Perfect answer!  So why don't you just get in the aircraft and fly to your destination scene or hospital WITHOUT the medical team...that'll show 'em!  And you'll be able to make your point, however stupid you end up looking doing so.

Give up the cowboy mentality cause it's not all about you, Roy.  We really hate attending those memorial services caused by arrogance, but we'll pretend you were the best pilot since Chuck Yeager as they lower your remains into the ground for the last time.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766689 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +1/-0     
Author:They all can say go but
2/28/2023 12:28:06 PM

Reply to: 2766666

only one has the authority. Take a guess bro



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766705 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-0     
Author:Ok
2/28/2023 2:17:39 PM

Reply to: 2766689

Maybe all you medical types should start your own page called just medical. Maybe you can help each other get better at your profession. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766707 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +2/-0     
Author:Slick
2/28/2023 2:20:29 PM

Reply to: 2766666

EMS is no diferent than any 135 charter operation. For all the talk of the medical folks being crew, baloney. They are passengers as far as flight goes. If I tell passengers I believe it is safe to fly and they don't want to fly so be it, we don't fly. If I say it's not safe to fly, we don't fly, period, no debate. I can't and won't try to force people to do anything they think is unsafe. If there are med personnel that commonly refuse to fly when I think it's safe that's their employers problem.

I've approached fliying passengers this way for 40 years and haven't heard any complaints.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766708 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-1     
Author:EMS
2/28/2023 2:36:49 PM

Reply to: 2766707

 IS 135 when you have people that aren't paid by the A/C Operator, they're customers!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766709 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +2/-1     
Author:olderendirt
2/28/2023 2:52:17 PM

Reply to: 2766708

IS 135 when you have people that aren't paid by the A/C Operator, they're customers!

And passengers. But, some operators require that customer/passengers have a veto on operations- they can't (ordinarily) make the flight happen but they can stop a flight operation based on company policy.

This can be a serious problem for the PIC when a particular crew objects to certain flights based on other than operational issues... say, desiring a better nights' sleep. Good management can see an obvious pattern when that is so, but it's a good idea for a pilot to keep a record of circumstances that result in lost flights. I'm not going to identify the pilot, crew or program, but a certain crew combination liked an uninterrupted night for extra-curricular activity... 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766711 Had one tell me where I needed to go to get fuel +0/-0     
Author:after I picked another place.
2/28/2023 3:26:27 PM

Reply to: 2766709

Had another tell me "just land it and don't worry about if I'm in my seat or not.  I don't work for you, you work for me."   And he was serious, as in, we can easily find another pilot to work here if you want to make a big deal about it!

 

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766714 Had one tell me where I needed to go to get fuel +0/-0     
Author:lol
2/28/2023 3:42:46 PM

Reply to: 2766711

 "just land it and don't worry about if I'm in my seat or not.  I don't work for you, you work for me." 

where else would they be? ayfkm bro



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766715 why justify a flight to go if SOMONE says NO?  +0/-1     
Author:who cares really????
2/28/2023 3:54:34 PM

Reply to: 2766714

if one of the crew says NO, then why try and justify it?  Its on them to explain it Not you....I have gotten in the attitude to not care to even try and argue to justify a flight....If one says no, then move on...Let them justify or explain to their bosses if asked WHY 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766729 so who had the authority then? ultimately? (NT) +1/-0     
Author:is this how we raise children?
2/28/2023 5:09:58 PM

Reply to: 2766715


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766728 they were putting in a second iv line (NT) +0/-0     
Author:bro
2/28/2023 5:07:21 PM

Reply to: 2766714


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766726 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-0     
Author:I see
2/28/2023 4:47:43 PM

Reply to: 2766666

it's you first day.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766743 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +2/-0     
Author:The phrase was made up by
2/28/2023 6:11:16 PM

Reply to: 2766666
some middle management med puke. There is no "3 to Go". Only the PIC can say "Go". The meds, pax, OCC, can say "No". It's not that complicated.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766747 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-0     
Author:yeah but
2/28/2023 6:23:23 PM

Reply to: 2766743

If the pilots says go and a med crew says no, no flight. So it is three to go.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766755 How long have you been in (NT) +1/-0     
Author:middle management?
2/28/2023 7:28:41 PM

Reply to: 2766747


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766762 How long have you been in +0/-0     
Author:Line pilot
2/28/2023 9:36:32 PM

Reply to: 2766755

not sure how it's possible to be confused by this but here we are



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766791 How long have you been in +1/-0     
Author:Don't care....
3/1/2023 9:54:15 AM

Reply to: 2766762
Just get in the back and be very, very quiet.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766765 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-0     
Author:THis just happened at phi health ….
2/28/2023 10:22:22 PM

Reply to: 2766666

And guess what, no more pilot



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766771 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-0     
Author:what just happened at PHI
3/1/2023 7:27:55 AM

Reply to: 2766765

sounds fascinating bro



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766787 One to say NO.... Pilot: NO, I don't think you medical types +2/-0     
Author:can handle this patient, so NO
3/1/2023 9:09:11 AM

Reply to: 2766666

I'm not comfortable with it!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766788 One to say NO.... Pilot: NO, I don't think you medical types +0/-1     
Author:yeah bro
3/1/2023 9:11:49 AM

Reply to: 2766787

that would be like so cool if you said that. you would totally own them and that would be like so awesome 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766789 They do it for weather! One didn't like flying when it was blowing 15kts (NT) +0/-0     
Author:or more, made her a bit airsick!
3/1/2023 9:45:34 AM

Reply to: 2766788


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766869 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +3/-0     
Author:Oh well....
3/1/2023 9:17:40 PM

Reply to: 2766666

It doesn't matter if you, the pilot says it's good to go.  If one of the medically trained passengers decides they're "not comfortable", screw it.  Go back to your TV show, movie, or whatever you were doing before the request came in.  I get paid whether I fly or not.  It isn't worth the argument.  Some of these people will "safety" themselves right out of a job at some point.  



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766871 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-0     
Author:It's not worth the arguement he says
3/1/2023 9:34:33 PM

Reply to: 2766869

who would be dumb enough to argue with a med crew that says no? It completely undermines the whole concept. YOU will be the one looking for a job.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766877 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +1/-0     
Author:Sounds good.
3/1/2023 11:13:28 PM

Reply to: 2766871
now get in the back and try not to kill the patient..


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766879 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-1     
Author:sure
3/1/2023 11:25:02 PM

Reply to: 2766877

but not if I say no, cap



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766909 This thread demonstrates just how dumb "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO" (NT) +0/-0     
Author:really is. PIC doesn't final nothing!
3/2/2023 10:22:50 AM

Reply to: 2766666


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766912 This thread demonstrates just how dumb "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO" +0/-1     
Author:it's really not that
3/2/2023 10:39:08 AM

Reply to: 2766909

complicated bro. the PIC doesn't have the authority to make people get on an aircraft. get it now.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766927 Yeah, I get it, he's not the final authority (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
3/2/2023 12:37:52 PM

Reply to: 2766912


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766933 Yeah, I get it, he's not the final authority  +0/-1     
Author:sure he is
3/2/2023 12:55:50 PM

Reply to: 2766927

he is welcome to take off. med crew are not saying the flight can't happen, it's just that they won't be on it. get it now. lol you retard



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766974 Yeah, so he flys it because he determined it was completely safe, and prove (NT) +2/-0     
Author:giving med crews opcon is stupid!
3/2/2023 8:50:00 PM

Reply to: 2766933


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766928 This thread demonstrates just how dumb "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO" +1/-0     
Author:you are correct bro...
3/2/2023 12:40:20 PM

Reply to: 2766912

and all the GO's are meaningless without the PIC's "GO". 

So we're kinda back to "1 to say NO"

Good luck in middle management.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766934 This thread demonstrates just how dumb "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO" +0/-1     
Author:it's hilarious
3/2/2023 12:57:57 PM

Reply to: 2766928

how confusing this is for you bro lol



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767001 It's not "confusing", it's simply a contradiction (NT) +1/-0     
Author:a logical paradox. An inanity!
3/3/2023 8:34:46 AM

Reply to: 2766934


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766976 We're back to PIC really isn't the final authority (NT) +0/-0     
Author:at all!
3/2/2023 8:51:43 PM

Reply to: 2766928


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767099 We're back to PIC really isn't the final authority +0/-1     
Author:Not we
3/4/2023 7:41:14 AM

Reply to: 2766976
just you lol


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767100 WE! If you're medic can say NO, you are not the final authority on this (NT) +1/-0     
Author:flight, even if you say GO!
3/4/2023 7:42:42 AM

Reply to: 2767099


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767134 WE! If you're medic can say NO, you are not the final authority on this +0/-1     
Author:final authority does not mean
3/4/2023 2:41:51 PM

Reply to: 2767100

you can make people get on an aircraft or even mean you can initiate a flight. that's why you're so terribly confused and upset about all this.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767097 And the PICs GO is meaningless without both medical crewmembers, making the +1/-0     
Author:PIC not the final authority....
3/4/2023 7:33:40 AM

Reply to: 2766928

So we're kinda back to "who has the final authority to say GO"?   It's not the PIC!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766968 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +1/-0     
Author:After reading this thread
3/2/2023 7:04:16 PM

Reply to: 2766666
You can see why HEMS has such a dismal record with wx related accidents compared to the rest of the commercial industry. No one else has passengers making go, no go decisions.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766971 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-1     
Author:say wut
3/2/2023 7:21:12 PM

Reply to: 2766968
they’re only making a no decision you dumb retard lol


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2766985 Whatever...it's not working very well. (NT) +1/-0     
Author:Anonymous
3/2/2023 10:10:21 PM

Reply to: 2766971


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767015 Whatever...it's not working very well. +1/-1     
Author:the intent is not to necessarily
3/3/2023 11:47:08 AM

Reply to: 2766985

reduce accidents but to give the med crew an out if they don't want to fly. are all of you this stupid because this is the most simple thing in the world but some of you dumb f**kers just cannot figure this out.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767017 "is there gong to be fog tonight, hopefully, it's looking foggy (NT) +1/-0     
Author:I've got to pick up my kids in the AM"
3/3/2023 11:57:45 AM

Reply to: 2767015


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767018 "is there gong to be fog tonight, hopefully, it's looking foggy +1/-0     
Author:it can be abused by med crew
3/3/2023 12:03:27 PM

Reply to: 2767017

same as pilots



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767019 when they aren't qualified to make a weather decision, they shouldn't be (NT) +1/-0     
Author:given final authority to decide it!
3/3/2023 12:26:00 PM

Reply to: 2767018


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767020 when they aren't qualified to make a weather decision, they shouldn't be +0/-0     
Author:technically,they aren't making the call
3/3/2023 12:30:54 PM

Reply to: 2767019

the flight can happen, just like any other flight. they just choose not to be on it. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767021 when they aren't qualified to make a weather decision, they shouldn't be +0/-1     
Author:as I said
3/3/2023 12:35:43 PM

Reply to: 2767020

you can't force somebody onto an aircraft by threatening their job. that's the whole idea. it works as designed. 99% of the time there is no issue. If they don't want to go, that's fine with me. so really you're chasing a windmill on this one bro



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767030 I SAID NO, and that's my final answer!  +0/-1     
Author:You can't make me!
3/3/2023 1:50:36 PM

Reply to: 2767021

IOWs, they have final authority to say go also!   It's not that hard to understand.   If you need me to say GO, and I don't, my decision is a final authority since it is equal to all authority!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767033 I SAID NO, and that's my final answer!  +1/-0     
Author:what if you
3/3/2023 2:08:56 PM

Reply to: 2767030

got another nurse. see, no operational control. the flight still happens.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767034 I SAID NO, and that's my final answer!  +0/-1     
Author:the med crew only has authority
3/3/2023 2:16:25 PM

Reply to: 2767033

over themselves, not the flight itself. what you are saying is illogical. the FAA would step in if what you're saying we're true. Its not bro. Give it up.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767037 yeah, sure, keep believing that! If what you say is true, then it's not (NT) +1/-0     
Author:3-to-go!
3/3/2023 2:23:15 PM

Reply to: 2767034


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767040 yeah, sure, keep believing that! If what you say is true, then it's not +0/-1     
Author:it's true bro
3/3/2023 3:01:19 PM

Reply to: 2767037

say you're on an oil platform and they want you to take a mechanic to a nearby platform to fix something. he refuses to get on the helicopter for whatever reason. is the mechanic exercising operational control? nope, he just won't get on the helicopter. same as the med crew.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767041 The mechanic on the oil platform is not a crewmember and the flight isn't +1/-0     
Author:a holding out to the public either!
3/3/2023 3:20:42 PM

Reply to: 2767040

On the EMS flight, it was.   It was a flight being requested not by the Nurse/Medic, but by a customer looking for an EMS helicopter to perform an air ambulance flight, which was cancelled because a medical crewmember had the final authority here say NO.  

The other situation was a private customer looking to move an employee of a that private customer.   It a flight being offered to the public as an AIR MOBILE MECHANIC SERVICE.

The one is a non-common carrier flight, the other is a common carrier flight!

The public was calling for an air ambulance and some non-pilot was making an operational decision not GO/accept the flight based personal feelings/comfort levels, even after the PIC (who has final authority) accepted the flight (i.e, said GO).

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767042 Look at it this way... 2 mechanics on an oil platform +0/-0     
Author:need to get to another platform, and
3/3/2023 3:25:48 PM

Reply to: 2767040

one say's, "no, I'm not flying" based on a superstition he has fying on days of the month that have a "1" in the date.   "NO, he says!   Period, you can't make me!"

 

So, the other mechanic is stuck on the oil platform and can't now get to the other because 1-said-NO



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767043 Look at it this way... 2 mechanics on an oil platform +0/-1     
Author:uh no
3/3/2023 3:33:35 PM

Reply to: 2767042

you can fly over and get the other mechanic lol you stupid retard



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767044 No I can't, it was a 3-to-GO rule! You gave the one the authority to say NO (NT) +1/-0     
Author:.... remember?
3/3/2023 3:45:12 PM

Reply to: 2767043


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767045 No I can't, it was a 3-to-GO rule! You gave the one the authority to say NO +0/-1     
Author:since the flight can happen
3/3/2023 3:55:37 PM

Reply to: 2767044

that should tell you something lol. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767049 It tells me that the "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO" rule means the PIC is not the (NT) +1/-0     
Author:final authority, & the rule is absurd!
3/3/2023 5:18:08 PM

Reply to: 2767045


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767050 It tells me that the "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO" rule means the PIC is not the  +0/-1     
Author:It’s not
3/3/2023 5:29:43 PM

Reply to: 2767049
a rule but works as intended


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767036 I'm all for that! (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
3/3/2023 2:21:30 PM

Reply to: 2767033


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767046 I'm all for that!  +1/-0     
Author:Ok
3/3/2023 4:25:31 PM

Reply to: 2767036

If you medical types would spend more time and effort on perfecting your skill, maybe less people will die while you are transporting them. Stay in your lane. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767047 Here's what I'd like to do sometime....  +1/-0     
Author:We're going to have to intubate here
3/3/2023 4:32:26 PM

Reply to: 2767046

NO, I say now, it sounds dangerouis and I'm not comfortable with you doing that.     I say NO.   We're not going.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767082 Here's what I'd like to do sometime....  +1/-0     
Author:so do it
3/3/2023 9:47:09 PM

Reply to: 2767047

the only thing stopping you is you're not an ems pilot



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767091 Here's what I'd like to do sometime....  +0/-1     
Author:you should do that
3/4/2023 2:17:11 AM

Reply to: 2767082

that would be so cool bro



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767157 Can't, because I'm not the final authority! (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
3/4/2023 6:46:49 PM

Reply to: 2767091


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767112 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +0/-1     
Author:it's a great system....
3/4/2023 10:53:40 AM

Reply to: 2766666

you can manipulate them to turn down flights and then go back to sleep.

Just bring up the radar, stare at it while rubbing your chin, hem and haw and then finally say something like "it looks doable".  Their little brains catch on fire and they start with the "I'm not comfortable" BS.  You turn it down because of the medcrew.

You get to be a company man, they get to be WX hero's, and everyone gets to sleep.

Win, win.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767116 meanwhile...the comp comes 30 miles in CAVU weather to fly not just 1 but 2 +1/-0     
Author:flights & earn a preferred status
3/4/2023 11:13:24 AM

Reply to: 2767112
from the requestor, because they know you've sandbagged them.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767124 not my problem the crew keeps cancelling... (NT) +0/-0     
Author:the paychecks keep cashing
3/4/2023 12:09:28 PM

Reply to: 2767116


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767153 until they don't when the base closes for no volume (NT) +1/-0     
Author:sort srt of is your problem.
3/4/2023 5:56:45 PM

Reply to: 2767124


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767158 So far, so good. Lots of jobs out there. (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Earn money sleeping.
3/4/2023 7:01:48 PM

Reply to: 2767153


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767185 so I should plan on moving because some non-PIC is causing missed FLTs that (NT) +0/-0     
Author:PIC said could have been completed??
3/5/2023 1:59:30 PM

Reply to: 2767158


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767186 so I should plan on moving because some non-PIC is causing missed FLTs that (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Yep
3/5/2023 2:40:41 PM

Reply to: 2767185


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767214 now we're back to the start. PIC is not the final authority (NT) +0/-0     
Author:to say GO
3/5/2023 7:47:24 PM

Reply to: 2767186


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767226 now we're back to the start. PIC is not the final authority  +0/-0     
Author:yes that's true
3/5/2023 9:30:50 PM

Reply to: 2767214

and always has been. PIC responsibility starts once everybody agrees to go and are at the aircraft.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767227 That means he doesn't have authority to initiate a flight since he needs +0/-0     
Author:the other two to initiate it also
3/5/2023 10:03:47 PM

Reply to: 2767226

That means he is sharing operational control, by definition, with medical crewmembers, even though the PIC and the OCC specialist have already approved the flight and got the necessary flight release.  



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767229 That means he doesn't have authority to initiate a flight since he needs +0/-0     
Author:no
3/5/2023 10:14:34 PM

Reply to: 2767227

when a flight attentant calls in sick and it's not covered so they cancel the flight, does the flight attendant have operational control? nope. doesn't matter why there not on the aircraft, they're just not. 

by definition lol



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767233 Not exactly what happens! They find a standby or extend someone to get it +0/-0     
Author:done! FA's don't cancel fligths
3/5/2023 10:38:21 PM

Reply to: 2767229

and sit around and still get paid to sleep!   They don't make weather decisions either!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767231 That means he doesn't have authority to initiate a flight since he needs +0/-0     
Author:the pilot doesn't need med crew
3/5/2023 10:30:55 PM

Reply to: 2767227

to "initiate" the flight. they just need to get on. if they don't, no point in going but hardly exercising operational control. ayfkm



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767234 "I'm not comfortable flying because it's windy" (NT) +0/-0     
Author:is an operational decision!
3/5/2023 10:41:22 PM

Reply to: 2767231


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767235 "I'm not comfortable flying because it's windy" +0/-0     
Author:no it’s
3/5/2023 10:42:55 PM

Reply to: 2767234

a passenger not getting on an aircraft 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767236 Except they aren't passengers! They are crewmembers! Getting paid to work (NT) +0/-0     
Author:on a helicoper air ambulance!
3/5/2023 10:44:10 PM

Reply to: 2767235


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767238 Except they aren't passengers! They are crewmembers! Getting paid to work  +0/-0     
Author:Single pilot
3/5/2023 11:01:02 PM

Reply to: 2767236

No, they are not crew members. If they were they would be getting crew member training and recurrent training like a part 121 crew membe. medical people are passengers.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767247 didn't call the flight crewmembers, but crewmembers! +0/-0     
Author:and the do get recurring training...
3/6/2023 12:10:37 AM

Reply to: 2767238
...on NVGs operations ...on egress of patients/passengers ...on emergency shutdowns ...on aircraft equipment ...on loading/unloading patients ...on floatation devices ...on LZ safety/security responsibilities ...on and on and on and on! All documented in FAA accepted crewmember training records.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767252 didn't call the flight crewmembers, but crewmembers! +0/-0     
Author:All documented
3/6/2023 2:40:37 AM

Reply to: 2767247

passenger training records



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767253 didn't call the flight crewmembers, but crewmembers! +0/-0     
Author:Not one of those dumb things
3/6/2023 3:02:17 AM

Reply to: 2767247

you mentioned has anything to do with the operation of an aircraft. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767267 Acting as a trained required crewmember for HNVGO ops is nothing +0/-0     
Author:to do with operating an aircraft?
3/6/2023 9:33:16 AM

Reply to: 2767253
what flight school did you graduate from?


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767269 Acting as a trained required crewmember for HNVGO ops is nothing +0/-0     
Author:putting some goggles on your head
3/6/2023 9:55:50 AM

Reply to: 2767267

does not make somebody a crew member. the day a company began using goggles is not the day the nurse became a crew member. you're asking somebody to look outside the aircraft. hardly a crew member function.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767270 Acting as a trained required crewmember for HNVGO ops is nothing +0/-0     
Author:the FAA does not recognize them
3/6/2023 10:01:58 AM

Reply to: 2767269

as aircraft crew members. I won't either



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767340 Yeah, but they do! (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
3/6/2023 10:33:48 PM

Reply to: 2767270


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767375 Yeah, but they do! +0/-0     
Author:saying they do
3/7/2023 11:20:11 AM

Reply to: 2767340

doesn't make it real. you do a little required safety training but they are passengers.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767400 does your company's GOM describe the duties of medical  +0/-0     
Author:folks on the aircraft?? if yes, then
3/7/2023 4:08:17 PM

Reply to: 2767375
it does make it real. if the GOM doesn't mention medical folks or any of their duties or responsibilities, then maybe you might have a point.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767456 does your company's med crews do nothing +0/-0     
Author:but play on their phones from
3/8/2023 3:44:46 AM

Reply to: 2767400

take off to landing? if so, you are carrying passengers 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767318 If it's "3-to-GO, 1-to-say-NO", who has the authority to say GO? +2/-0     
Author:Let's put this in perspective...
3/6/2023 5:43:51 PM

Reply to: 2766666

You fly for an on-demand 135 operator.  A rich guy calls and says he wants a helicopter to take him to the Super Bowl stadium.  On the day of the game it's raining but well above your wx minimums so you're ready to go.  The guy calls you and says he doesn't want to fly because of the weather.

Has he exercised operational control?

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767341 Your perspective is a bit out of focus, you might need to check your  +1/-0     
Author:perscription! Here's the scoop
3/6/2023 10:42:01 PM

Reply to: 2767318

The guy in your scenerio is the customer.   The customer is calling the certificate holder to fly him to the Super Bowl because the certificate holder holds out to the public to provide 1st class helicoper service from point A to point B, complete with a cabin attendant who will polish his shoes and serve him a fine Latte.  The rich customer hires the certificate holder for that 1st class service because the certificate holder's 2nd tiered operational control person (the pilot) determined the flight could be completed.   Then, the cabin attendant decides they don't want to go because they have a hot date later and call a NO for the flight, cancelling the flight the real customer contracted for.

 

You have the customer wrong in your example.   The rich guy is the requesting hospital, not the medical crewmember.  

Therefore, your perspective is very blurry and way out of focus!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767347 Your perspective is a bit out of focus, you might need to check your  +0/-0     
Author:the rich guy
3/7/2023 12:25:47 AM

Reply to: 2767341

is a passenger...the medcrew are passengers.  The FAR's don't mention customers.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767348 dies the customer paying for it know there are other (NT) +0/-0     
Author:customers riding along on his dime then?
3/7/2023 12:50:00 AM

Reply to: 2767347


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767343 The Rich Guy Still Wants to Go, So he Calls your (NT) +0/-0     
Author:competition, and they earn his business
3/6/2023 11:17:32 PM

Reply to: 2767318


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2767784 The Rich Guy Still Wants to Go, So he Calls your  +0/-1     
Author:boring
3/10/2023 10:53:18 PM

Reply to: 2767343

W TF ever.  Can we all just go to bed now?



Reply  Return-To-Index