Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2759194 H145 +1/-1     
Author:Utility work
1/17/2023 11:53:13 AM

Who out there uses the H145 in the powerline business?



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759196 H145 +2/-2     
Author:No one
1/17/2023 11:56:57 AM

Reply to: 2759194

Because it's expensive as F and pointless. I think SDG&E had something similar thst helistream or something was apart of. No clue what happened with that. Edison had some 135s they tried it with. Some are using 429 now. Most is pointless as engine failure accidents conducting HEC work are virtually non existent.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759197 H145 +0/-10     
Author:uh
1/17/2023 12:05:29 PM

Reply to: 2759196

there is a lot more to utility work that HEC bro. you don't fly two engines for redundancy so much as payload.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759200 H145 +2/-4     
Author:Bro
1/17/2023 12:15:44 PM

Reply to: 2759197

= 80's term go back to your mullet trailer park ya rube!!! SMH!



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759201 H145 +2/-1     
Author:Lol
1/17/2023 12:16:58 PM

Reply to: 2759197

If you think you fly 2 engines for payload in anything utility besides a heavy then you don't fly utility. name a light twin out there used for utility that can sling something that isn't a tonka toy....I'll wait. 
anything else the kmax is the way. 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759210 H145 +0/-6     
Author:ScCal
1/17/2023 12:38:11 PM

Reply to: 2759201

2 engines and still 1 single point of failure in a single  transmission. Makes a lot of sense 😳



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759213 H145 +9/-2     
Author:but what is more likely to fail
1/17/2023 12:43:26 PM

Reply to: 2759210

the engine. you really can't argue the fact that you keep flying with a twin and and in a single you don't. to argue against the redundancy of two engines is to not comprehend reality.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759242 H145 +0/-5     
Author:WirePapa
1/17/2023 3:58:36 PM

Reply to: 2759213

Someone please tell me what airframe out there has true OEI fly away capabilities in an OGE hover at max gross weight. As a reminder, in the utility world we hover a lot and I'm not sure there is a twin out there that can pull itself out of an OGE hover on one engine at sea level on a cool day never mind at high DA's. In the utility world excellent maintenance, and well trained and supported crews will out perform anything a twin might do for you in an emergency. Twin engines = bigger smoking whole. IMHO. 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759243 H145 +3/-2     
Author:cool story bro
1/17/2023 4:06:50 PM

Reply to: 2759242

 Don't give me any garbage about maintenance and "well trained and supported crews" etc. In a single you're going into the rocks, trees, wires or whatever is directly below you and it's going to hurt. You may not always fly away in a twin but you will fly. 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759245 H145 +4/-0     
Author:for absolute certainty
1/17/2023 4:44:22 PM

Reply to: 2759242

I know what won't fly away and is going straight down at any weight no matter how well you and your crew are trained: a single.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759255 H145 +2/-1     
Author:Honest Question
1/17/2023 5:53:45 PM

Reply to: 2759242

Why would you be anywhere near the max gross limit of a light twin while doing powerline work, of course other than a belly hooked external load? Not being a smart ***, just don't know much about what you do.

That being said, on a cool day at sea level an AW109S at max gross would do fly away from an OGE hover of a few hundred feet OEI without exceeding any limits. Granted it would be a horrible airframe for utility work but that wasn't a stipulation in the question. 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759290 H145 +1/-1     
Author:true
1/17/2023 8:07:03 PM

Reply to: 2759255

a 109 would do that



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759321 H145 +1/-1     
Author:S76B
1/18/2023 7:22:55 AM

Reply to: 2759242

will do that!



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2762573 H145 +0/-0     
Author:Generally
1/20/2023 8:25:16 PM

Reply to: 2759321

agree but it really depends on pilot reaction to accel pitch and power management.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2763209 H145 +0/-0     
Author:Lop Sided Sid
1/26/2023 2:35:45 PM

Reply to: 2759321

But it can't pass a gas station



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2759312 H145 +0/-0     
Author:Old as power liner
1/18/2023 12:35:31 AM

Reply to: 2759194
Southern Cal Edison tried it but it wasn’t very useful or practical. Some of that was at the time most of their pilots were low time long liners. PG&E hints at it enough that PJ Helicopters bought a few 429’s but mostly the 407 and 500 series are preferred for the lighter loads and HEC. Cost per hour is still the big factor.
Truth is HEC is pretty low on the danger scale as lineman stuff goes. More die each year from other work then all HEC deaths ever combined.


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2762692 H145 +0/-0     
Author:Super
1/22/2023 5:35:11 PM

Reply to: 2759194

BO105 vomit comet, unless there are five blades.



Return-To-Index