Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2732314 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +1/-13     
Author:(July 2019)
6/14/2022 10:11:36 AM

Headline Reads:

 

A federal court just ordered the pilots who fly your Amazon Prime packages to stop calling in sick excessively and refusing to work overtime

 

Because it is illegal!

 

https://www.businessinsider.in/a-federal-court-just-ordered-the-pilots-who-fly-your-amazon-prime-packages-to-stop-calling-in-sick-excessively-and-refusing-to-work-overtime/articleshow/70134783.cms

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732316 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +1/-1     
Author:I don’t think it’s illegal to refuse
6/14/2022 10:27:45 AM

Reply to: 2732314

overtime bro. The rest of that stuff is totally unenforceable, yet effective.🙂



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732317 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +2/-1     
Author:Pilots are in the drivers seat.
6/14/2022 10:31:09 AM

Reply to: 2732316

What's atlas going to do? Call a cop or fire them? lol 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732401 Atlas will ask the court to sanction the union! (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Anonymous
6/14/2022 10:04:12 PM

Reply to: 2732317


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732322 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +0/-0     
Author:It's totally academic
6/14/2022 10:44:08 AM

Reply to: 2732316

you could make tuesday and the sun coming up illegal, too.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732402 Sanctions (Fines) are hardly academic! (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
6/14/2022 10:05:11 PM

Reply to: 2732322


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732605 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +0/-0     
Author:Yeah,
6/16/2022 12:55:52 PM

Reply to: 2732322

but that does not exist, so, again, academic at this point.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732363 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +0/-0     
Author:Depends
6/14/2022 4:04:57 PM

Reply to: 2732316

on their contract and employee hand book.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732444 Ruling went no where as the federal appeals court ruled they lacked  +0/-0     
Author:Jurisdiction. Voluntary is pretty simple
6/15/2022 11:01:21 AM

Reply to: 2732363

This was not. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732489 Appeals Court AFFIRMED the decision, and added a few more of  +0/-0     
Author:points of their own.
6/15/2022 6:09:54 PM

Reply to: 2732444
You always make claims but provide ZERO supporting citations. Hope you aren't bargaining is similar fashion!


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732604 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +0/-0     
Author:Depends
6/16/2022 12:55:02 PM

Reply to: 2732316

on your CBA, employee handbook and other contracts or papers to which both parties agreed prior to a difficulty arising.  Legal or not, what you agree to can be a real PITA down the road.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732318 False. Courts don’t have authority over “voluntary” workover rules  +2/-0     
Author:Not the same thing. Wrong again!
6/14/2022 10:32:26 AM

Reply to: 2732314

The use of suck time and voluntary workover are NOT the Same. The court lacks jurisdiction and the ruling has already been appealed and overturned. good try though. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732320 That *WAS* the Appeals Court Order! (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Reading it would have helped you there!
6/14/2022 10:35:36 AM

Reply to: 2732318


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732327 Here's another article about it: +0/-3     
Author:Federal Appeals Court Ruling
6/14/2022 11:08:42 AM

Reply to: 2732320

 

 

Federal Court Sides With Atlas Air In Dispute With Pilots

FreightWaves
November 22, 2019
 

A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld a lower court ruling that pilots for Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc....

The decision is the latest in a series of setbacks for the union. Last summer, two arbitrators separately rejected the Atlas pilots' request to negotiate their next contract and instead imposed an arbitrated contract process. A U.S. appeals court also affirmed a district court decision that ordered the union to stop work slowdowns and related tactics, such as taking excessive sick days on short notice or refusing to volunteer for overtime shifts.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/federal-court-sides-atlas-air-223720660.html>

 

They ruled this because it is ILLEGAL



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732328 The fact you are using the term “illegal” proves your lack of (NT) +3/-0     
Author:Legal comprehension. Not applicable
6/14/2022 11:20:38 AM

Reply to: 2732327


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732329 The article is outdated and overturned. This was for an unauthorized and (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Confirmed “work action.” Fake news
6/14/2022 11:21:41 AM

Reply to: 2732327


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732365 Here's another article about it: +0/-0     
Author:Refusing
6/14/2022 4:08:59 PM

Reply to: 2732327

to 'volunteer' for overtime shifts?

Bit paradoxical but maybe that's just between my ears.  If an overtime shift is voluntary and one does not volunteer is that really a 'voluntary' OT shift?  Sounds more like a mandatory requirement, they ask, you do.  Sounds like employment to me but contracts and CBA and employee handbooks can be interpreted.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732386 It explains it in the court rulings.... +1/-1     
Author:Historically, company plans for it.
6/14/2022 6:18:57 PM

Reply to: 2732365

dThe norm is that the company has become accustome to a certain amount of overtime/workovers being conducted each pay period/month.   Just like the airlines do for pilot picking up Open Time.   They build it into the schedule.   it is predictible.   It is expected.   There is an economic norm established.

So, now you send the company official negotiation letters and enter into bargaining, and at the same time, CHANGE the norm to put pressure on the company.   That is a work action when you should be operating STATUS QUO (no changes).  You have union pilots calling for a "no overtime/workover" effort in order to put pressure on the company at the table.   It was openly stated.   They are attempting to call it "voluntary", but hey have established a normal to what "voluntary" means.   A simple statistical analysis from HR/Payroll can easily show a correlation to Section 6 vs the amount of overtime/workover that is being covered.   If there is a "norm" established, any deviation from that "norm" is easily correlated to a hush-hush economic workaction.   

That why the courts ordered them to cease and decist, and ordered the Union to denounce it offically and control their (militant) members from acting in a wildcat fashion.   It is ILLEGAL under the RLA to take action against your company until released by the NMB to enter self-help.   And, the quickest way for that to happen is for either of the two parties to enlist the mediation services of the NMB.   Seems the company did just that while the union complained they did.   Seems the company is seeking to come to a conclusiong in negotiation than the union, judging by that action.

BTW, seeking NMB mediation is generally a normal part of the process in negotiations, and is not considered to be bypassing it, as the union accused them of doing.

 

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732439 False.RLA and NMB specifically describe the steps in the process including  +0/-0     
Author:Direct negotiations until a stalemate
6/15/2022 10:54:03 AM

Reply to: 2732386

Each party is "required" to meet and confer on initial meeting dates and locations and then "required" to engage in "direct negotiations" between both of those parties. Only once either party is unwilling to continue or a stalemate is reached can either party break from direct negotiations and apply for mediation. Again, the more you speak it becomes abundantly clear you have no idea what you are talking about. Mediation is common in most all civil processes, howevwe, other requirements are to be met prior to getting to that point. Once one party says the "refuse" to engage in direct bargaining or work with the other party then it would seem you could apply. Only further proving the letter that it is AMC who is NOT willing or wanting to ratify the contract and they are the ones reusing to bargain. 

Mr Mayors I thought you would have learned all of this when the union crushed you and your false claims in court with the DOL several years ago....I see you are up to the same things trying to be a lawyer and wearing your tin foil hat. No one takes you serious and no one trusts what you have to say and for good reason.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732497 A few things in response: +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
6/15/2022 6:57:36 PM

Reply to: 2732439

Upon Section 6 Notice, parties are required to meet, but not necessarily on their own.  If you read the RLA carefully, EITHER party can request NMB mediation anytime.  Since the company has had experience dealing with this non-Transportation (ie, little experience in RLA labor relations), they know up front to simply/quickly solicit the aid of a mediator.   The message by the union claiming the company was bypassing policy was simply hyperbole, false, and antagonistic!   

 

Second, what "court case" are you referring to?   DOL had a court case?   They are an administration, not a court.   But, even then, what case are you referring to?   A peruse of the DOL website doesn't document any case.  You keep like bringing it up, but you keep it a secret as well.   Propaganda?



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732440 Fake News. “Voluntary” for workover is NOT an expectation by the standard (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Set by the court. Try again
6/15/2022 10:55:08 AM

Reply to: 2732386


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732319 Federal court lacks jurisdiction and cannot FORCE “voluntary” workover (NT) +1/-0     
Author:Your “citation” does NOT apply
6/14/2022 10:33:54 AM

Reply to: 2732314


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732331 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +5/-0     
Author:Overtime Is Not The Same As An
6/14/2022 11:29:58 AM

Reply to: 2732314

Open shift.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732335 Have you voiced your concerns to the Union? If not, you are complicit (NT) +0/-0     
Author:As u said. A union is its “members”
6/14/2022 11:53:56 AM

Reply to: 2732314


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732336 An anonymous doesn’t count…. (NT) +0/-0     
Author:We will all wait for your contributions
6/14/2022 11:54:36 AM

Reply to: 2732335


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732342 Work over, shift coverage and overtime  +2/-0     
Author:Are voluntary
6/14/2022 12:16:23 PM

Reply to: 2732336

A judge can not make me work more than my scheduled shifts.  A judge can not make me do anything.  If I want to do extra work, whatever you want to call it, I will. If I don't want to do extda work, I will. Sounds like you are pressuring me to do something that I am not obligated to do.  

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732357 A judge can fine your union, however, which is fining you (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
6/14/2022 2:23:07 PM

Reply to: 2732342


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732350 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +1/-0     
Author:To be illegal
6/14/2022 1:02:21 PM

Reply to: 2732314

There must be a law against it

 

 

Contrary to that, the laws of my state PROTECT workers being able to choose whether or not to participate in voluntary overtime shifts



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732352 There is, the RLA, which prohibits slowdowns and economic (NT) +0/-0     
Author:actions during (Section 6) negotiations
6/14/2022 1:23:20 PM

Reply to: 2732350


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732355 Individuals have rights according to the courts and “voluntary” is made (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Very clear in the rulings
6/14/2022 1:48:23 PM

Reply to: 2732352


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732356 "...very clear in the rulings." Where, show us! (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
6/14/2022 2:21:49 PM

Reply to: 2732355


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732358 Still waiting for your source for the union pushing for work actions… (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Still waiting
6/14/2022 2:28:52 PM

Reply to: 2732356


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732360 You already provided it! Now it's the Union's DUTY to (NT) +0/-0     
Author:condemn it!
6/14/2022 2:50:37 PM

Reply to: 2732358


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732361 FALSE! Here you go though. We the Union condemn ur actions on the anonymous +0/-0     
Author:Forum the law and bylaws
6/14/2022 2:53:41 PM

Reply to: 2732360

Your bringing union business public is a violation of the law and your oath as a union member. So, there that. Good Luck Jimmie the Mayors



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732362 You just provided it again... You are a union member advocating for (NT) +0/-0     
Author:a work slowdown/no workover campaign
6/14/2022 3:01:53 PM

Reply to: 2732361


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732364 "... is a violation of the law..."? (NT) +0/-0     
Author:How is it a violation of the law?
6/14/2022 4:06:54 PM

Reply to: 2732361


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732367 "... is a violation of the law..."? +0/-0     
Author:It isn’t
6/14/2022 4:13:37 PM

Reply to: 2732364

unless you do more than just express your 1st Amendment Rights with respect to the matter.  

If you 'organize' an illegal action, well, then, it is probably not going to be received well, especially if you impact the companie's bottom line.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732378 You're right! So why did you say bringing union business to a public forum +0/-0     
Author:is against the law??
6/14/2022 5:22:02 PM

Reply to: 2732367

There is not law saying you can't talk about union business on a public forum, you are correct.  But there is a law (the RLA) saying you can't encourage work stoppages, interruptions of service, work slowdowns, or any other economic actions against your company during negitiations, since that is a form of self-help.   The two are very different, with the latter being ILLEGAL



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732441 Another tin foil hat theory by (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Jimmie the Mayors
6/15/2022 10:55:47 AM

Reply to: 2732360


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732387 There is, the RLA, which prohibits slowdowns and economic  +0/-0     
Author:Not volunteering
6/14/2022 6:29:12 PM

Reply to: 2732352

For voluntary overtime is not in violation.

 

 

Sometimes I pick up a bunch of extra flying, sometimes I do not....it is legally my choice to determine when those happen



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732388 Voluntary overtime (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Is voluntary
6/14/2022 6:53:33 PM

Reply to: 2732387


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732396 Until a Court orders the Union otherwise (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
6/14/2022 8:10:32 PM

Reply to: 2732388


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732397 Until a Court orders the Union otherwise  +0/-0     
Author:oldNtired
6/14/2022 8:23:46 PM

Reply to: 2732396

Don't think the Feds can do that unless the Wartime Powers Act is put into effect.  But in this Brave New Woke World I guess they can do what ever they want, none of the Milleys will question it.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732399 New Woke World? RLA was enacted in 1926 & amended in 1934 & 1936 (NT) +0/-0     
Author:It's been around for quite some time!
6/14/2022 9:27:29 PM

Reply to: 2732397


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732406 Until a Court orders the Union otherwise  +1/-1     
Author:A court can order a union
6/15/2022 12:11:16 AM

Reply to: 2732396

To do whatever a court likes.  Doesn't alter the fact that I am the one who chooses when to pick up a shift 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732422 ... and causes your union to be fined/sanctioned +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
6/15/2022 8:47:58 AM

Reply to: 2732406

https://www.freightwaves.com/news/disgruntled-pilots-blast-5-year-contract-with-atlas-air

 

Disgruntled pilots blast 5-year contract with Atlas Air

Wednesday, September 15, 2021

 

Limited by law from striking, the pilots worked to the minimum required by the contract to pressure the company to make concessions. Federal courts in 2019 ordered the union to stop work slowdowns and related tactics, such as taking excessive sick days on short notice or refusing to volunteer for overtime shifts. The courts also required the sides to follow an arbitrated contract process, much to the chagrin of pilots. 

 

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732447 Again your citation is for sanctioned slow downs BY the Union (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Don’t see that going on here
6/15/2022 11:04:33 AM

Reply to: 2732422


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732481 Sure you do... uniin pilot's and agents are here pushing for it +1/-0     
Author:you included. Whisper campaigns
6/15/2022 5:25:59 PM

Reply to: 2732447
Besides, it doesn't matter, as the court ruled in the Delta case, ALPA had a DUTY to ensure it wasn't happening, and we haven't heard a peep crom OPEIU/Local 109 discouraging such a practice (because it is ILLEGAL and putting the Union in jeopardy). It tacit approval, so the ball is in their court!


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732495 Encouraged slowdowns by workers when the Union fails to stop/quell/denounce (NT) +0/-0     
Author:it. You skipped over that part of ruling
6/15/2022 6:47:52 PM

Reply to: 2732447


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732398 Federal Court Orders To Stop Refusing Overtime +0/-1     
Author:just sayin'
6/14/2022 8:26:11 PM

Reply to: 2732314

"The pilots were excessively calling in sick, choosing not to work overtime, and other work-slowdown actitivies. Airline pilots are barred from most strikes under the Railway Labor Act, a law dating back to the 1920s and '30s that limits striking that could interrupt interstate commerce."

Don't think EMS pilots are barred from striking under RLA. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732400 Depends on who they work for! If it is an air carrier, they cannot strike +0/-0     
Author:If they work for a public operator....
6/14/2022 9:57:11 PM

Reply to: 2732398

Air Carriers and their employees are subject to the RLA.

Public operators and their employees are not subject to the RLA.

 

If you are subject to the RLA, you cannot strike until the NMB releases you to do so (releases you to self-help)



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732403 Work over, shift coverage and overtime (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Are voluntary
6/14/2022 10:23:48 PM

Reply to: 2732400


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732404 Wasn't for Atlas Pilots recently  +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
6/14/2022 10:58:10 PM

Reply to: 2732403
https://www.businessinsider.in/a-federal-court-just-ordered-the-pilots-who-fly-your-amazon-prime-packages-to-stop-calling-in-sick-excessively-and-refusing-to-work-overtime/articleshow/70134783.cms


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732427 Here is the Court's ruling. Long, but clearly explained.  +0/-0     
Author:Relevant excerpt's cited:
6/15/2022 9:09:06 AM

Reply to: 2732403

If you work in this industry, and desire to economically or operationally hurt your employer anytime, but especially during Section 6 negotiations, you should read the whole thing:

 

https://cite.case.law/f-supp-3d/280/59/

 

Finally, in a variation of its minor dispute argument, the Union makes glancing reference to provisions of the existing CBA that, in its view, permit or authorize the conduct that Atlas seeks to enjoin. It argues, for example, that the existing CBA bars pilots from refusing to work “‘normal’ overtime,” giving rise to an inference that pilots may refuse to work “unusual overtime.” Dkt. 56 at 10. But that position, once again, misunderstands the nature of Atlas’s claim. Atlas is not arguing that certain pilots were required to work overtime, or to volunteer for open time, under the existing CBA. Nor is it arguing that certain pilots violated the CBA by blocking out at the last minute or by calling in sick or fatigued. Rather, it is claiming that the Union'is violating the RLA by encouraging its members to engage in a concerted effort to do less — to stop helping out Purchase — in order to obtain leverage in the ongoing contract negotiations. That claim is not dependent on whether the underlying conduct is prohibited by the existing CBA but, rather, turns on whether the Union has orchestrated a concerted change in the status quo to influence the negotiations. See Delta Air Lines, 238 F.3d at 1307-08cf. Elevator Mfrs.’ Ass’n of New York, Inc. v. Local 1, Int’l Union of Elevator Constructors, 689 F.2d 382, 386 (2d Cir. 1982) (“That the overtime was designated as voluntary in the contract does not ... render the concerted refusal *83to' perform it any less a strike.”) (citation omitted).

 

 

c. Open Time Flying

Atlas next alleges that the Union has violated the RLA by encouraging pilots to decline to volunteer for open time flying assignments. Open time flying is a common feature of airline operations, see Delta Air Lines, 238 F.3d at 1302, and begins with a flight that lacks a crew.. This can occur for a variety of reasons, such as sick calls, fatigue calls, delays due to maintenance issues, last-minute customer requests, or lack of sufficient staff. Dkt. 5-3 at 15-16. Regardless of the cause, Atlas attempts to fill open space in two ways. First, it has a supply of reserve crew members available each day. Dkt. 5-3 at 15-16. These pilots are required to be available to fly, but will not necessarily be close enough to cover a particular flight. Dkt. 5-3 at 16. In addition, there are occasions when the reserve is already fully utilized. Id. That leads to the second method of staffing open time: volunteers. Atlas sends out requests for volunteers for a given flight, and available pilots, who are offered premium pay to cover the open time, are then given the opportunity to bid on the available flight. Dkt. 5-3 at 16. When multiple pilots bid on the same flight, the open time trip is given (or, at least, should be given) to the pilot with greatest seniority. Id. It goes without saying that unfilled open time damages the company, which cannot complete the flight as scheduled.

...

Atlas has presented convincing evidence that, since the Union served its Section 6 notice, (1) the company has faced greater difficult in filling open time trips, and' (2) it has been unable to fill a greater proportion of its open time trips...

[bold emphasis added]

...

Reviewing these statements in the context of the overall record and in light of the Union’s recognition of the risk of making more explicit assertions, the Court is left with little doubt that the increased difficulty that Atlas has had in filling open time strips is a product of the Union’s campaign to apply pressure on Atlas in the ongoing CBA negotiations.

...

[finally]

For all of these reasons, the Court concludes that it has jurisdiction over this dispute and that Atlas has carried its burden of demonstrating that it is entitled to a preliminary injunction preserving the status quo while the parties engage in the process mandated by the RLA for resolving major disputes.

 

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732429 Shift coverage work over and over time are voluntary (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Overtime is voluntary
6/15/2022 9:14:23 AM

Reply to: 2732427


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732431 Voluntarily, and subject to sanctions by a court for changing (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Status Quo for not volunteering !!
6/15/2022 9:30:59 AM

Reply to: 2732429


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732436 Overtime is voluntary (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Not t mandatory
6/15/2022 10:33:00 AM

Reply to: 2732431


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732494 Until a Court determines folks, like you here, are encouraging ILLEGAL +0/-0     
Author:bad faith bargaining tactics!
6/15/2022 6:46:02 PM

Reply to: 2732436

Which would be very easy to do, given the big effort here and statistical analysis if the amount of workovers change subsequent to Section 6 and this hush-hush campaign!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732443 These were supported actions by the union with evidence of their (NT) +0/-0     
Author:“Campaign.” Not the same or even close
6/15/2022 10:59:46 AM

Reply to: 2732427


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732446 As always you only present part of an issue and are selective in the messag (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Still no integrity or transparency JM
6/15/2022 11:03:26 AM

Reply to: 2732443


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732500 That's funny, since theink to the WHOLE reference was provuded +0/-0     
Author:All you need to do is read them.
6/15/2022 7:10:06 PM

Reply to: 2732446
Feel free to cite the parts that support your point that you can run a hush-hush campaign to inflict economic pain on the company as leverage in you bargaining


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732450 Doesn’t seem the Union is scared or playing into your propaganda… (NT) +2/-1     
Author:Proud Union !!!
6/15/2022 11:16:31 AM

Reply to: 2732314


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732451 Status quo +0/-0     
Author:Status quo
6/15/2022 11:22:07 AM

Reply to: 2732450

Overtime is voluntary.  



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732486 See, once again you admitted it is union instigated and/or (NT) +0/-0     
Author:endorsed.
6/15/2022 5:51:37 PM

Reply to: 2732450


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732492 See, once again you admitted it is union instigated and/or +0/-0     
Author:the union can endorse
6/15/2022 6:16:20 PM

Reply to: 2732486

Charles Manson but that doesn't make it illegal yo



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732461 Guess we will wait too see if AMC sues the Union and it’s members….doubt it (NT) +1/-1     
Author:Union Strong!
6/15/2022 1:39:55 PM

Reply to: 2732314


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732498 Their first course of action is to get an NMB mediator, who will +0/-0     
Author:They have begun that already.
6/15/2022 6:59:17 PM

Reply to: 2732461

You guys are stepping in a hole you won't be able to get out of!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732513 Stating fact is not a hole +0/-0     
Author:Fact
6/15/2022 8:29:45 PM

Reply to: 2732498

Fact - overtime, shift coverage and work over are voluntary.  They were voluntary a month ago and will remain voluntary.  



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732700 Illegal for courts to do so. PIC final authority +0/-0     
Author:Sicko
6/17/2022 7:10:37 AM

Reply to: 2732314

Can not force me to fly if I am sick.

Straight from the AIM

    1. The CFRs prohibit a pilot who possesses a current medical certificate from performing crewmember duties while the pilot has a known medical condition or increase of a known medical condition that would make the pilot unable to meet the standards for the medical certificate.

  1. Illness.</strong>
    1. Even a minor illness suffered in day‐to‐day living can seriously degrade performance of many piloting tasks vital to safe flight. Illness can produce fever and distracting symptoms that can impair judgment, memory, alertness, and the ability to make calculations. Although symptoms from an illness may be under adequate control with a medication, the medication itself may decrease pilot performance.
    2. The safest rule is not to fly while suffering from any illness. If this rule is considered too stringent for a particular illness, the pilot should contact an Aviation Medical Examiner for advice.
  2. Medication.
    1. Pilot performance can be seriously degraded by both prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications, as well as by the medical conditions for which they are taken. Many medications, such as tranquilizers, sedatives, strong pain relievers, and cough‐suppressant preparations, have primary effects that may impair judgment, memory, alertness, coordination, vision, and the ability to make calculations. Others, such as antihistamines, blood pressure drugs, muscle relaxants, and agents to control diarrhea and motion sickness, have side effects that may impair the same critical functions. Any medication that depresses the nervous system, such as a sedative, tranquilizer or antihistamine, can make a pilot much more susceptible to hypoxia.
    2. The CFRs prohibit pilots from performing crewmember duties while using any medication that affects the faculties in any way contrary to safety. The safest rule is not to fly as a crewmember while taking any medication, unless approved to do so by the FAA.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732703 Not forcing you to do anything, just sanctioning your union (NT) +0/-0     
Author:for their ILLEGAL wildcat actions
6/17/2022 8:04:04 AM

Reply to: 2732700


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2732747 Overtime is voluntary (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Work over is voluntary
6/17/2022 11:48:03 AM

Reply to: 2732703


Reply  Return-To-Index