Actually Green? Short answer, no.

https://granitegrok.com/blog/2022/03/the-lefts-electric-car-future-is-all-carbon-smoke-and-mirrors

your links should not be to right wing propoganda sites.

it's a propoganda site. 

thought coal was good. thanks for clearing that up.

About hypocrisy. And the child-like ignorance of the green-new-dealers. Like you.

Ju another hit piece from people afraid of change! Or for who the present situation is profitable!

very few things terrifiy the rubes more than thinking they will have their f350 confiscated and replaced with a prius. driving around in a civic with large lets go brandon flags would take away all the perverse joy they get from it.

Civic? Why aren't you walking or biking everywhere, while holding your breath so that you don't exhale Co2? 

it gets 40 mpg which makes me not care about the price of gas. Have fun with 250 

If you are really a tree hugger and drive a civic, well done. I'm thinking your just trolling. I really was rolling on the floor when GM came out with the electric Hummer. Save the planet,electric  Hummer does'nt guzzle gas or diesel, just electricity guzzler.

Then you have Scott Kirby talking about being carbon neutral. They are going to use more sustainable fuel to meet the goal by 2050 to be carbon neutral. CEO BS, explain to me what sustainable fuel is approved for a jet engine, biodiesel? Jet fuel from animal fat?  United also announced unvaccinated will return to work March 28, lets go Scotty!

Your knees in your chest, and you think you are better than all the rest, in a Yugo. 

been in a car

answer?   Eff no.    

Why not just higher gas mileage etc.?

lol

Battery tech has come a very long way but flying vehicles still need to be operated safely and predictably.  I guess I gotta look closer and figure how things like manned VTOL drones are going to autorotate etc.  

through tort collusion.

ur not kidding.  

I guess the best answer to this green lunacy is a matter of understanding, which our Grrrrrreeeeen New Steal characters have no clue; just doing it as a popular platform for votes to achieve power.

 The proponents here in the US are not doing their homework, not even close.  

If we're to go electric how is that energy going to get to the end user?  Through our alleged dilapidated grid (not sure it is THAT bad).  What happens in the UK when you need a boost or recharge during the exclusion hours?  How much amperage are all these vehicles pulling off the grid?  How much does it cost the end-user and the maintenance costs to the generation companies?  What happens when the grid goes down?  Costs of batteries for replacement?  What to do with recycling them?  Gas stations serve customers in a matter of minutes.  How large are country side recharge stations going to be in order to accommodate vehicles and passengers with a 30 minute to 3-5 hour charge requirement?  What happens to the price of goods made from petroleum which will be more expensive as petroleum becomes more scarce?

Good thing is battery nano tech is really moving forward with very long range batteries that may solve the above, excepting the price of petrol goods.

The idea CO2 is destroying the planet probably has great merit, scientists have seen it before in sediment studies.  However, the US is not nearly the culprit.  Check out China, India, Africa and South America, especially the CO2 scrubbing Amazon that is set to be irreversibly lost.  By 'check it out' I mean go to these places and try to breathe.  WE, the people of the US, are not the CO2 problem politicians make us out to be and we do not need to sacrifice our selves to lead the world in to the future of electric boondoggles.  Politicians go down these insane deep-dive roads for votes, plain and simply it is a matter of their desire for control and power funded by some of the richest characters in the world.  We're pawns, nothing more.