Msg ID:
2721827 |
RLC S-92 +1/-5
|
Author:twisted wrench
2/28/2022 1:37:35 PM
|
Rumors are flying around that RLC is looking for 92 pilots and mechanics starting in June. I wonder how many? They are cheap right now. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2721842 |
RLC S-92 +0/-0
|
Author:lol
2/28/2022 2:34:09 PM
Reply to: 2721827
|
check your source bro |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2721847 |
RLC S-92 +0/-2
|
Author:dude wonders "how many"
2/28/2022 2:56:21 PM
Reply to: 2721842
|
lol |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2721850 |
RLC S-92 +0/-1
|
Author:if they are looking for pilots
2/28/2022 3:26:58 PM
Reply to: 2721847
|
they should try posting an ad. probably get more applicants than a rumor but just a guess. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2721886 |
RLC S-92 +0/-1
|
Author:I thought roc was
2/28/2022 9:30:57 PM
Reply to: 2721850
|
buying PHI as soon as something or other was supposed to happen. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2721895 |
RLC S-92 +0/-0
|
Author:PHI
3/1/2022 8:16:17 AM
Reply to: 2721886
|
PHI is getting SAR from Bristow |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2722347 |
RLC S-92 +0/-1
|
Author:that guy
3/4/2022 11:20:47 PM
Reply to: 2721895
|
RLSEA is building a hangar big enough for two S-92's from what i see. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2722349 |
RLC S-92 +0/-1
|
Author:where at
3/4/2022 11:33:32 PM
Reply to: 2722347
|
it ain't in Broussard I know dat |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2722397 |
RLC S-92 +0/-1
|
Author:sky king.
3/5/2022 5:27:51 PM
Reply to: 2722349
|
golden meadow, along with a whole row of new pads sized for 92's. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2722412 |
RLC S-92 +0/-1
|
Author:lol
3/6/2022 10:55:34 AM
Reply to: 2722397
|
you don't build pads for 92's. not how it works bro. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2721993 |
RLC better concentrate on flying B407 (NT) +5/-1
|
Author:without crashing first
3/1/2022 7:50:51 PM
Reply to: 2721827
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2722630 |
RLC S-92 +0/-0
|
Author:Cheap
3/9/2022 1:10:50 PM
Reply to: 2721827
|
not good. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|