Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2709211 Raytheon at fault for AW169 wreck +3/-0     
Author:penalty boxer
10/29/2021 11:02:44 AM

the stadium crash in the UK was due to Raytheon's faulty tail rotor garbage 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leicestershire-59071547

 p>



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709219 Raytheon at fault for AW169 wreck +3/-0     
Author:Yep
10/29/2021 11:30:28 AM

Reply to: 2709211

Leonardo JUNK!!!



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709272 Raytheon at fault for AW169 wreck +1/-3     
Author:Agusta
10/29/2021 5:57:36 PM

Reply to: 2709219

Pretty good helicopters really 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709273 Raytheon at fault for AW169 wreck +6/-1     
Author:Debbie
10/29/2021 6:19:24 PM

Reply to: 2709211

The pilots were equally at fault for doing that take off.  40 kts of forward airspeed would of saved them and prevented it from spinning out of control.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709275 Raytheon at fault for AW169 wreck +1/-0     
Author:Josb
10/29/2021 6:25:43 PM

Reply to: 2709273
Absolutely correct. Vertical takeoffs and Cat A are a death sentence for a helicopter.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709276 Raytheon at fault for AW169 wreck +4/-5     
Author:...
10/29/2021 6:34:32 PM

Reply to: 2709273

Guess you're clueless as to what a CAT A take-off profile is or understand what PC1 or PC2 performance class rotorcraft are. Surprised



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709291 Raytheon at fault for AW169 wreck +4/-2     
Author:Debbie
10/29/2021 9:42:27 PM

Reply to: 2709276

I do actually.  Standard max performance takeoff would have saved them.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709292 Raytheon at fault for AW169 wreck +3/-0     
Author:That Is Not Clear. On A Profile
10/29/2021 9:55:36 PM

Reply to: 2709291

You described at the same time from lift there might not have been enough airspeed to maintain directional control.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709297 the T/R went to full right pedal..they were (NT) +2/-2     
Author:scr*w*d no matter what..
10/29/2021 11:56:21 PM

Reply to: 2709273


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709342 All these anonymous Mavericks here (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Studs will land it on 1 M/R blade
10/30/2021 12:38:30 PM

Reply to: 2709297


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2709314 Raytheon at fault for AW169 wreck +0/-1     
Author:Not At Fault, Just Getting Sued
10/30/2021 8:58:23 AM

Reply to: 2709211

It's easier to get money from an American company before the report is actually released.



Reply  Return-To-Index