Msg ID:
2706431 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +0/-0
|
Author:either lucky or crazy
10/7/2021 12:55:47 PM
Reply to: 2706425
|
foggy as hell looks like |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706442 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +4/-0
|
Author:Yeah
10/7/2021 2:19:40 PM
Reply to: 2706431
|
well isn't is an IFR SHIP? |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706433 |
Oh, Mercy Mercy me (NT) +0/-0
|
Author:Things aren't what they used to be
10/7/2021 1:23:18 PM
Reply to: 2706425
|
|
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706449 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +1/-1
|
Author:been around
10/7/2021 2:56:47 PM
Reply to: 2706447
|
nah, that's just not the way it works in real life |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706451 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +4/-1
|
Author:Hmmmm...
10/7/2021 3:16:45 PM
Reply to: 2706449
|
Depends on Co., Local Mgr., Hospital. Just like FAA don't follow own FAR's FSDO to FSDO! |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706452 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +0/-2
|
Author:nah
10/7/2021 3:20:48 PM
Reply to: 2706451
|
that's not the way it works in the real world. you don't do this for a living, I can tell |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706455 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +2/-0
|
Author:Yeah
10/7/2021 3:39:17 PM
Reply to: 2706452
|
Ok sure |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706456 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +1/-0
|
Author:been around
10/7/2021 3:48:25 PM
Reply to: 2706452
|
Accident was at 0130Z? METAR just before and just after the accident. Nearest TAF at Rochester wasn't forecasting it. I probably would have taken it, too. Why he tried to land there, who knows.
SPECI KGVQ 070143Z AUTO 13004KT 1 1/2SM BR OVC002 16/16 A3031 RMK AO2=
METAR KGVQ 070056Z AUTO 13005KT 8SM BKN002 16/16 A3031 RMK AO2 SLP263 T01560156=
KROC 062101Z 0621/0718 10006KT P6SM FEW015 OVC025 FM070000 07004KT
P6SM BKN035 FM070300 VRB04KT P6SM BKN035 FM071400 23004KT
P6SM BKN035= |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706457 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +1/-0
|
Author:same ole sh*t
10/7/2021 4:04:21 PM
Reply to: 2706452
|
No, you obviously have not worked for a hospital based program. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706459 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +1/-1
|
Author:lol
10/7/2021 4:07:31 PM
Reply to: 2706457
|
That's what I'm doing this very minute but you were saying |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706460 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +0/-0
|
Author:been there
10/7/2021 4:19:01 PM
Reply to: 2706459
|
Batavia sits right between Rochester and Buffalo. 25 miles east or west to either one. What I don't understand is why the pilot went to Batavia when the weather was reporting dogsh*t, while both Buffalo and ROC were clear. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706463 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +1/-0
|
Author: Batavia does have an ILS
10/7/2021 4:24:14 PM
Reply to: 2706460
|
so I guess that could have been what was going on but instead of going missed, |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706462 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +2/-0
|
Author:same ole sh*t
10/7/2021 4:22:28 PM
Reply to: 2706459
|
Have fun with that late call |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706464 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +2/-0
|
Author:lol
10/7/2021 4:25:07 PM
Reply to: 2706462
|
you're right about that! |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706458 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +1/-0
|
Author:same ole sh*t
10/7/2021 4:05:23 PM
Reply to: 2706451
|
EXACTLY!!! |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2706551 |
Mercy Flight ‘hard landing’ +0/-1
|
Author:EMSer
10/8/2021 4:26:36 PM
Reply to: 2706458
|
200 and 1 1/2 is doable and safe. Not unheard of for us to do 200 1/2 or even 1/4. |
|
Reply Return-To-Index
|