Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2705835 Air Methods Salary +0/-3     
Author:Johnny Dingo
10/3/2021 9:50:42 AM

I see quite a few open positions at Air Methods- what is the base pay for a west coast IFR helicopter pilot without COLA or stipends? Thanks for any input.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705836 Air Methods Salary +5/-3     
Author:About
10/3/2021 10:00:41 AM

Reply to: 2705835

Tree Fiddy!



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705838 It’s on the Unions website. Entire contract is. (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Good luck
10/3/2021 10:22:23 AM

Reply to: 2705835


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705842 It’s on the Unions website. Entire contract is. +0/-1     
Author:yeah, good luck
10/3/2021 10:30:56 AM

Reply to: 2705838

figuring out pay on that thing



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705845 Nothing to figure out. It’s black and white with numbers….. (NT) +1/-1     
Author:Reading and numbers are hard
10/3/2021 10:45:38 AM

Reply to: 2705842


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705875 Nothing to figure out. It’s black and white with numbers….. +1/-0     
Author:not you again
10/3/2021 1:17:49 PM

Reply to: 2705845

if gives you a starting range and pay raise percentages and that's it. There is no scale. Tell me the pay of say, a 5 year pilot in Henderson NV. You can't.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705881 Nothing to figure out. It’s black and white with numbers….. +2/-1     
Author:you're right, nothing to figure out
10/3/2021 1:40:19 PM

Reply to: 2705875

because you can't figure it out. Pilots there are all at different rates due to buyouts, mergers, etc. There is no pay scale. That's why there is just the 3.25 annual raise and ACCRA difference. The reason they don't publish a pay scale is there isn't one. 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706020 False. Starting pay $73,808 and 3.25% for every year (NT) +0/-0     
Author:So easy it’s complicated for you
10/4/2021 12:14:22 PM

Reply to: 2705881


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706308 Wait, if 5bere is a "salary" prescribed by the CBA, why did +0/-0     
Author:the CA pilot's file a lawsuit?
10/6/2021 10:05:56 AM

Reply to: 2706020
More importantly, why did the UNION let them? The CBA prescribes a salary and t6be terms for which that salary is earned, which included the duty ready obligation. The claim that the pilot's are not getting paid for that is basically absurd, since it is PART of their negotiated annual salary ad spelled out in Appendix A. That lawsuit was frivolous and filed in the wrong venue, since the complaint was a grievance under the RLA. The NMB handles disputes, not the California Court system!


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705948 3.25% annually. starting salary based on experience. (NT) +0/-1     
Author:You are NOT very smart are you…
10/3/2021 8:28:36 PM

Reply to: 2705875


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705965 3.25% annually. starting salary based on experience.  +0/-0     
Author:I think
10/3/2021 9:31:06 PM

Reply to: 2705948

I already said that twice. where's your numbers bro



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705997 3.25% annually. starting salary based on experience.  +0/-0     
Author:Salary based on experience is not
10/4/2021 8:56:48 AM

Reply to: 2705965

a number.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706013 Appendix A in CBA are the numbers. (NT) +0/-0     
Author:3.25% after that. It’s not hard
10/4/2021 11:52:11 AM

Reply to: 2705997


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706017 Appendix A in CBA are the numbers. +0/-0     
Author:not hard but
10/4/2021 12:02:31 PM

Reply to: 2706013

where you start is the problem since no pay scale bro



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706019 Starting pay is listed. Simple as that. $73,808 (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Spoon fed snowflake
10/4/2021 12:13:14 PM

Reply to: 2706017


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706022 Starting pay is listed. Simple as that. $73,808 +0/-0     
Author:no it isn't
10/4/2021 12:24:53 PM

Reply to: 2706019

as in no it isn't



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706023 Starting pay is listed. Simple as that. $73,808 +0/-0     
Author:what it say
10/4/2021 12:29:54 PM

Reply to: 2706022

"The Company reserves the right, based on previous experience of a Pilot(s), to place them at a starting salary between $67,016 and $73,808".

 

Google "reserve the right" and get back to me.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706036 Starting pay is listed. Simple as that. $73,808 +0/-0     
Author:And if you think they are
10/4/2021 1:13:06 PM

Reply to: 2706023

starting pilots with experience at 73k, you're stupid.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706132 Starting pay is listed. Simple as that. $73,808 +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
10/5/2021 7:37:43 AM

Reply to: 2706036

AMC pilot here...yes that range is where ALL new hires start.  If you've got a few years experience you could probably talk them into the 73k.  You're definitely not getting more, as that would violate CBA.

That's your base pay.  Then add your COLA or stipend.  Overtime calculated at your base pay rate tho, 1.5x33.7.

Stop being a d bag and accept your answer



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706159 Starting pay is listed. Simple as that. $73,808 +0/-0     
Author:uh
10/5/2021 10:38:17 AM

Reply to: 2706132

then they are, by far, the lowest paid pilots in the industry. How do you know that's what they're paying? Face it, you don't. You gonna tell me an new hire experienced SPIFR pay is 75k IF they're lucky? Get real.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706170 Starting pay is listed. Simple as that. $73,808 +1/-0     
Author:it would NOT
10/5/2021 11:06:08 AM

Reply to: 2706132

violate the CBA. What's stopping them from paying more? Nothing. Do you think the union would complain and say "hey, you're paying us too much!" They can "reserve the right" to pay that, but it sure as hell doesn't mean they have to. Is it possible they could give up that right?



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705989 It’s on the Unions website. Entire contract is. +0/-0     
Author:OP
10/4/2021 12:57:42 AM

Reply to: 2705838

No, if you are not yet an employee of Air Methods , the contract is NOT available on the union website.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706051 Isn't that the contract that requires a pilot to take a flight (NT) +0/-0     
Author:past 12 hrs of duty?
10/4/2021 2:05:19 PM

Reply to: 2705989


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706054 Isn't that the contract that requires a pilot to take a flight +0/-0     
Author:up to 14 if flying
10/4/2021 2:13:20 PM

Reply to: 2706051

The contract says: "A normal schedule shift shall not exceed twelve (12) hours. This section will not relieve any Pilot from accepting any flight that may extend the shift beyond the scheduled twelve (12) hours as long as the flight can be conducted in accordance with the applicable FAR’s and Company duty time policies."

In a nutshell, pilots work a 12-hour shift unless they are called out on a flight. If called out, the total 'duty time' cannot exceed 14 hours. The Union protects pilot's ability to be back at their home base by 14 hours from the time s/he clocked in for duty.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706056 Total duty can exceed 14 hours. Can't plan a part 135 flight past 14, but (NT) +0/-1     
Author:you certainly can plan other duties
10/4/2021 2:17:25 PM

Reply to: 2706054


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706058 Total duty can exceed 14 hours. Can't plan a part 135 flight past 14, but +0/-0     
Author:Listen to the POI
10/4/2021 2:27:12 PM

Reply to: 2706056

1. You must be realistic in your planning.

2. There is absolutely NO obligation to fly beyond 14. If you realize you're going to exceed 14, you can leave the crew at the hospital and fly back to base within 14 hours. The oncoming pilot will go back to pick up the crew. 

3. Our RAD and the AMC POI instructed us pilots "skids down by 14" so I'm following that.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706071 POI can't make new regulations! No FAR requirement for a 14-hour  +0/-0     
Author:duty day under FAR 135.267(d)
10/4/2021 3:15:36 PM

Reply to: 2706058
We don't operate under FAR 135.267(c), so ther isn't a duty day maximum. We operate under FAR 135.267(d) and can plan to fly Part 135 up to 14 hours, but there isn't a restriction on duty. Can't start rest until off duty, whenever that happens. Scheduled duty is not the same as actual duty, as you cited out above, CBA requires a pilot to exceed 12 hrs for revenue flights, as does "end of scheduled shift" meetings, "end of scheduled shift" drug testing, "end of scheduled shift" training, and "end of scheduled shift" travel, etc


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706076 POI can't make new regulations! No FAR requirement for a 14-hour  +0/-0     
Author:135.267(c)
10/4/2021 3:26:30 PM

Reply to: 2706071

The AMC pilots work "a regularly assigned duty period" therefore they must operate under 135.267(c) according to the regulations. A company can't just say they operate under 135.267(d) when their operations are DEFINED under 135.267(c). They must operate under (c) unless they choose to change their operation and have the pilots not assigned to regular duty periods. That's how the Regulations read and the FAA Legal Interpretations also clarify that. 

The current GOM is wrong by claiming their operations are under 135.267(d) and it is in the process of being rectified. 

Don't be a slave to a greedy corporation.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706088 Sorry, that is not correct. Per their GOM, they work under 135.267(d) +0/-0     
Author:Schedule is not regularly assigned.
10/4/2021 4:03:14 PM

Reply to: 2706076
Pilot's swap shifts schedule weekly. They go from DAY to NIGHT schedules in the same week, or every other 7 day run. That is NOT "regarly assigned" according to FAA in several Chief Council explanations. Maybe one or two bases that are day only, or 5 day military contracts qualify as "regularly assigned", but the certificate holder chooses its application and this company has chosen to operate under 135.267(b). Therefore, there is no mandatory 14 hour duty restriction dictated by 135.267(c)


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706232 Total duty can exceed 14 hours.  +0/-0     
Author:Show us the signed letter from the FAA..
10/5/2021 7:10:47 PM

Reply to: 2706058

and your RAD. The RAD from what region?



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706304 He won't, because he can't, because there isn't one (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
10/6/2021 9:57:48 AM

Reply to: 2706232


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706057 Absolutely nothing in the CBA "protects" a pilot to be back (NT) +0/-1     
Author:at his home base in 14 hours. Nada!
10/4/2021 2:20:11 PM

Reply to: 2706054


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706059 Absolutely nothing in the CBA "protects" a pilot to be back +1/-0     
Author:You're doing it wrong then
10/4/2021 2:29:57 PM

Reply to: 2706057

Then you're doing it wrong. Slave away, if that's working for you.

For those who don't want to exceed 14, AMC won't take any action against you for getting back to base by 14, even if it means leaving the med crew. That's how we roll and management supports us.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706061 I agree if you can get back by 14 hrs, it's OK, but you can't (NT) +0/-0     
Author:pass on a flight simply because it's >12
10/4/2021 2:37:37 PM

Reply to: 2706059


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706063 ...and nothing says you have to be back at your home base +0/-0     
Author:at the end of your "shift". Nada!
10/4/2021 2:41:44 PM

Reply to: 2706061
Nothing in the CBA demands a pilot end his shift where he started, ot that he can't be assigned to another base for coverage on a scheduled workday.


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706079 ...and nothing says you have to be back at your home base +0/-0     
Author:Union says back at home base
10/4/2021 3:36:54 PM

Reply to: 2706063

Our agreement is that we must be back at our AMC home base at the end of our shift. We are NOT REQUIRED to end our shift at another base but can voluntarily do so. 

Yes, we can be assigned to work at another base but we duty on at the regular time at our home base and end our shift at our home base, within 14 hours. 

None of the pilots are ever required to exceed 14 hours of duty time during a shift. Some do so voluntarily and others refuse to exceed 14 under any circumstances. 



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706082 Nothing in CBA says that! Nothng in FARs say that. (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Nothing in GOM says that.
10/4/2021 3:41:41 PM

Reply to: 2706079


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706086 Nothing in CBA says that! Nothng in FARs say that. +0/-0     
Author:Clarification from Union
10/4/2021 4:01:57 PM

Reply to: 2706082
DUTY PERIOD PLANNING POLICY REMINDER
 
OPEIU Local No109 Pilots,
 
This is a reminder to Pilots to ensure that you are educated and operating within the scope and requirements for Duty Period Planning and to ensure safe operations.
 
ALL planning MUST be done so that you can complete the "flight assignment" and not exceed your 14-hour "Duty Period Assignment," regardless of what "Option" you choose.
 
1) The Company can use a planning matrix for several reasons such as to give customers estimated times, provide ideal expectations of lift and completion times in normal operations, and for general planning purposes. However, pilots MUST be using "actual" and "realistic" planning times to ensure YOUR compliance with the planning requirements i.e. aircraft hangared and not outside, adding of fuel, location, known weather, delay with crew, patient considerations and equipment delays, reposition legs, etc.. To ensure that YOU meet your regulatory obligations "ACTUAL" and "REALISTIC" planning times and events MUST be used. Document these on your matrix form and keep records of them.
 
2) If you are going to turn a flight down for duty time, be sure you can honestly and accurately state your reasoning. This is no different than with weather turn downs. If you can safely and legally accept and take the flight, do it. It's our job. If not, don't. But, be able to justify why and be confident in your decision. If at any time you feel pressured to fly make sure you complete an AIDMOR and ASAP/ASRS report listing the specific manager and circumstances. The Alert Line and/or filing a report with your local FSDO are also resources available to you.
 
3) Flight Duty Assignment "Planning" should include a 'Return-to-Base Leg' that can be completed within 14 hours, including all directives by the Company. The "Option C" of taking a one-way flight MUST be voluntary and agreed upon PRIOR to accepting that flight; and ALL logistical requirements must be met and confirmed (hotel, rental car, etc.) PRIOR to accepting that flight assignment. You have NO obligation to accept a one-way flight assignment, as doing so is a change in working conditions that you as an individual are accepting on a non-precedent setting basis. This "flight assignment" and all known directives MUST also be planned to be completed within the same 14-hour duty period assignment, i.e. drive to get rental car, drive to hotel, return to base drive, etc.
 
4) Most of the issues we are dealing with and addressing are related to the "planning" phase for accepting a "flight assignment." If you can plan to legally accept a flight assignment then you can then legally complete that flight assignment, even if it exceeds 14 hours for circumstances that were outside of the control of the pilot or the certificate holder; as long as it can be completed safely and the fatigue of the pilot and crew have been evaluated.
 
NEVER allow yourself to be pressured to rush your processes and procedures. NEVER jeopardize SAFETY to appease a manager or "try" to capture that flight. Protect YOUR certificate. Protect YOUR crew.
 
We all want the Company and our Pilots to be successful, SAFELY. If you experience any form of threats, coercion, or intimidation (real or perceived), IMMEDIATELY contact your Local or Regional Steward for assistance.


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706119 Most of that guidance is rubbish. No back to base requirement. No 14 hr  +0/-3     
Author:requirements. FAR 135.267(d)
10/4/2021 9:14:19 PM

Reply to: 2706086
For planning, need to show 10 hour rest in previous 24 hours from reasonably planned completion time of Part 135 legs. If no crewmembers aboard, no FAR 135 requirements. It's simple and has been simple since at least the 1980's.


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706089 Nothing in CBA says that! etc. +1/-0     
Author:Are you a slave to the company?
10/4/2021 4:09:55 PM

Reply to: 2706082

Just wondering why you're so eager to please the corporation when you're within your rights to make sure you're back at your base within your 14-hour duty day? If your managers are pressuring you otherwise, you need to speak with your Union rep because you're getting screwed.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705924 Air Methods Salary +2/-0     
Author:Buster brown
10/3/2021 6:13:15 PM

Reply to: 2705835

CBA determined within a range, 68-74-ish + IFR Pay + ATP + ACCRA (COLA) + Stipend (if available) + off duty housing (if available). So, 77 to 99 (w accra) ballpark. Stipend +3-5k, housing = ?

 

rough formula.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2705988 Air Methods Salary +0/-0     
Author:holy sh/t
10/4/2021 12:28:36 AM

Reply to: 2705924

i got a headache from that



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706673 Air Methods Salary +1/-0     
Author:That AMC
10/9/2021 10:14:31 PM

Reply to: 2705835

an ok company to work for but their daily shift admin, computer, paperwork and verification rigamaroll is mind bogglingly unclever.  Really takes what enthusiasm you might have for a helicopter career and dumps it squarely in the toilet!  If they could relieve pilots of all the BS it would be one of the best operators going, assuming HAA is your bag.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706787 It got that way after pilot's took an incredibly easy job (NT) +1/-0     
Author:and routinely messed it up!
10/10/2021 9:29:17 PM

Reply to: 2706673


Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2706980 It got that way after pilot's took an incredibly easy job +0/-1     
Author:Management
10/11/2021 9:40:56 PM

Reply to: 2706787

type pilots with no clue the mss they were/are creating.  Education counts.



Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2707153 It got that way after pilot's took an incredibly easy job +0/-0     
Author:Agree
10/13/2021 9:46:07 AM

Reply to: 2706787

Very very unclever.



Return-To-Index