Msg ID: 2703433 Why would an employee need to disclose his Vax status when (NT) +1/-0     
Author:the State has the records and status?
9/13/2021 7:24:51 PM


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703437 Why would an employee need to disclose his Vax status when +1/-0     
Author:because
9/13/2021 7:31:27 PM

Reply to: 2703433

they are not allowed to release them



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703507 Why would an employee need to disclose his Vax status when +0/-0     
Author:Want ELT medical records released
9/14/2021 7:41:19 AM

Reply to: 2703437

If I have to give my medical info, I want the brass to release theirs.  Bet there is a bunch of ED and mental health issues in that bunch.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703444 Why would an employee need to disclose his Vax status when +2/-0     
Author:It’s Just The Opposite Of What The
9/13/2021 8:12:59 PM

Reply to: 2703433

CNN headline reads;

https://presscalifornia.com/2021/09/13/journo-asks-for-unvaxxed-obits-flooded-on-fb-with-vaxxed-horror-death-stories/

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703648 Why would an employee need to disclose his Vax status when +1/-0     
Author:Ever
9/15/2021 9:30:43 AM

Reply to: 2703433

  heard of Hippa?  Not sure if it would cover a state disclosure of citizen vax status but I suspect it could get a challenge.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703655 Why would an employee need to disclose his Vax status when +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
9/15/2021 9:45:33 AM

Reply to: 2703648
Dude (if I'm guessing correctly), HIPAA is not applicable here. First, the government would be the ones mandating employers get this info, but 5he government should already know since the government keeps those shot records in the first place; and second, HIPAA is not applicable for an employee against his employer or the government. It is not protected health information.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703705 Yes, HIPPA does apply at an air medical company and HBS program (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Not to mention ADA and ACLA
9/15/2021 1:45:18 PM

Reply to: 2703655


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703810 HIPAA applies an an HAA company so you don't disclose your customer's healt (NT) +0/-0     
Author:information, not your employee's
9/15/2021 9:26:13 PM

Reply to: 2703705


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703843 Wrong! EEOC is federal law that states you are NOT required to disclose (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Medical info to employer
9/16/2021 12:26:08 AM

Reply to: 2703810


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703844 Wrong! EEOC is federal law that states you are NOT required to disclose  +0/-0     
Author:right
9/16/2021 12:29:41 AM

Reply to: 2703843

but they can still not hire you or terminate you if you don't meet their conditions of employment 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703912 So it's not HIPAA then! Cite the EEOC law you are (NT) +0/-0     
Author:referring to.
9/16/2021 12:28:41 PM

Reply to: 2703843


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703913 So it's not HIPAA then! Cite the EEOC law you are (NT) +0/-0     
Author:You Cite It
9/16/2021 12:29:36 PM

Reply to: 2703912


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703914 So it's not HIPAA then! Cite the EEOC law you are +0/-0     
Author:Do Your Own Work For One In
9/16/2021 12:30:33 PM

Reply to: 2703913

Your life.

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703917 You seem to always fall flat on the citations you claim exist +0/-0     
Author:Suppose....
9/16/2021 12:34:43 PM

Reply to: 2703914
your employer requires a First Class medical to be employed at their job site, are you not saying you sent have to disclose that information to them, and show them a copy of the certificate?


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2703999 You seem to always fall flat on the citations you claim exist +0/-0     
Author:The
9/17/2021 11:43:46 AM

Reply to: 2703917

Medical is required by Federal law therefore the operator is required to assure you have a current one.  Without seeing a copy they can't, ergo, you have to give them a copy, or at least let them see it, or whatever, you get the point.



Reply  Return-To-Index