Msg ID:
2700442 |
LA times blames fire victims +5/-0
|
Author:BigT
8/22/2021 9:07:09 AM
Reply to: 2700409
|
It's not a "climate change" issue, it's a put the damn fire out issue. If left to operational firefighters, we wouldn't have this problem. However, the un-elected, cubicle-dwelling, bureaucrafts at the forest service spend too much tome with their baloney ICS system while the forest burns. They care not about the health effects of smoke generated by the fires. |
|
Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2700462 |
LA times blames fire victims +2/-0
|
Author:NauousDamous
8/22/2021 11:18:29 AM
Reply to: 2700409
|
Small fires cost money. Big fires open up the Federal Money Barrel |
|
Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2700751 |
I love the job security it’s an industry +0/-0
|
Author:Newsome
8/25/2021 7:51:21 AM
Reply to: 2700462
|
This crappy management has been going on for 20 years. The environmental, the liberal courts the forest service making this an industry. It's so sad |
|
Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2700605 |
LA times blames fire victims +2/-1
|
Author:Hmmmm...
8/23/2021 12:39:57 PM
Reply to: 2700409
|
Newsome's a Pelosi nephew and HE allows thief's to steal up $950 WITH OUT ANY prosecution!! Moron up there W/Quid Pro Quo Slo Cup O Joe & the Camel T03!! |
|
Return-To-Index
|
Msg ID:
2700612 |
Stand in the street, get hit by a car? Who's at fault? +2/-0
|
Author:R D Nekk
8/23/2021 3:30:46 PM
Reply to: 2700409
|
But I agree- build in a floodplain, you're eventually going to have water in your house.
Quote an excerpt from the article: "Given the right conditions, wildlands will inevitably burn. It is a misconception to think that treating fuels can 'fire-proof' important areas," the report said." |
|
Return-To-Index
|