Click here to close
New Message Alert
List Entire Thread
Msg ID: 2689802 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? +0/-6     
Author:Do they limit GA to 14 hrs?
5/22/2021 8:16:15 AM

Is the FAA considering banning or prohibiting all Part 91 commercial flying to 14 hrs of duty?   

Can a Commercial Pilot flying a Part 91 ferry flight for a customer fly past 14 hours of "duty" without showing 10 hours of rest at the planned completion of the flight?

 

 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689804 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? +7/-1     
Author:Go
5/22/2021 9:03:07 AM

Reply to: 2689802

away 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689807 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? (NT) +1/-1     
Author:FNGs
5/22/2021 10:23:10 AM

Reply to: 2689804


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689809 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? +1/-1     
Author:Have fun
5/22/2021 10:42:21 AM

Reply to: 2689802
FAA.GOV for you


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689819 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? +0/-0     
Author:Doo Tee Guy
5/22/2021 11:03:45 AM

Reply to: 2689809

He's not wrong. At least half of the replies on this forum prove that there is no agreement on what crew rest is and isn't.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689826 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? +2/-1     
Author:Haapilot
5/22/2021 12:30:27 PM

Reply to: 2689802

There is no duty limit for part 91. If done while on a part 135 operation you cannot count it as rest. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689837 FALSE! That repo leg is NOT rest and is still part of your (NT) +2/-0     
Author:Duty Time
5/22/2021 1:53:24 PM

Reply to: 2689826


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689886 If you are operating under 135.267(c) maybe (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Not for 135.267(d)
5/22/2021 7:02:09 PM

Reply to: 2689837


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689833 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? +0/-0     
Author:Septuigent
5/22/2021 1:39:09 PM

Reply to: 2689802

Last thread went to 72 replies with no agreement.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689840 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? +1/-0     
Author:Burp
5/22/2021 1:56:07 PM

Reply to: 2689833

I logged just over 12 hours of flight time in one day once.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689851 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? +2/-0     
Author:Ore Gasmatron
5/22/2021 3:54:02 PM

Reply to: 2689840

Perfectly fine if it's part 91. Are you including sim time?



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689854 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of  +0/-1     
Author:Part 91/133 powerliner
5/22/2021 4:29:24 PM

Reply to: 2689802
Clearly the FAA doesn’t consider duty days in excess of 14 hours duty unsafe. They allow it after all.
In the summer months with long days it is a regular day for utility and ag guys to not only have a duty day over 14 hours but actually spent 14+ in the seat! My longest flight time day to date is 15.7 actual flight time. I’m just like dozens of other guys doing this work.


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689857 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of  +0/-0     
Author:15 hrs flight time
5/22/2021 4:43:13 PM

Reply to: 2689854

you fool. 



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689872 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of (NT) +0/-0     
Author:simple answer = YES
5/22/2021 6:19:47 PM

Reply to: 2689857


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689883 So are they going to ban all flying over 14 hrs regardless +0/-0     
Author:of who? 91, 135, 121, 133, etc
5/22/2021 6:58:46 PM

Reply to: 2689872
It's either safe, or it's not


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689954 So are they going to ban all flying over 14 hrs regardless (NT) +0/-0     
Author:simple answer = YES
5/23/2021 1:37:27 PM

Reply to: 2689883


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689980 Pipe dream! (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
5/23/2021 4:42:04 PM

Reply to: 2689954


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689855 It’s only dangerous for HAA pilots apparently (NT) +0/-1     
Author:Anonymous
5/22/2021 4:36:18 PM

Reply to: 2689802


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689959 I love the new utility guy who comes here talk of how tough and hard it is +1/-0     
Author:Utility easiest flying I ever did
5/23/2021 1:55:08 PM

Reply to: 2689855

They are the real insecure bunch.....



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689991 I love the new utility guy who comes here talk of how tough and hard it is +1/-0     
Author:hahaha,
5/23/2021 5:27:35 PM

Reply to: 2689959




Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689982 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of  +1/-0     
Author:Old utility guy
5/23/2021 5:08:23 PM

Reply to: 2689802
Utility is easy enough since we rarely have passengers. JH is mostly for HAA types that fly point to point 3 hours a day and whine about duty day fatigue at least once a week. Look at the threads, just always looking to find some authoritative info to avoid a little overtime.
Personally, I make a great deal of my income when that machine is running! 8,10, 12 hours is MONEY,


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689992 Yep, +0/-0     
Author:money curve....
5/23/2021 5:41:07 PM

Reply to: 2689982




Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2689997 Looksike a breast in a skimpy blue bikini top (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
5/23/2021 6:09:21 PM

Reply to: 2689992


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2690010 Get your pilot to explain it to you. (NT) +0/-0     
Author:"the more you know"
5/23/2021 8:33:15 PM

Reply to: 2689997


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2690040 the more I know, the more I can use against you (NT) +0/-0     
Author:Anonymous
5/24/2021 7:34:08 AM

Reply to: 2690010


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2690072 Work performance and safety deteriorate after 8 hours according to (NT) +0/-0     
Author:The studies and science.
5/24/2021 12:29:10 PM

Reply to: 2690040


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2690153 Work performance and safety deteriorate after 8 hours according to (NT) +1/-0     
Author:Utility slug
5/24/2021 8:56:06 PM

Reply to: 2690072
Studies by whom? Personally I can say my ability doesn’t fade after 10 hours in the seat. My ability to give a damn does however.
1 hour or 10 hours, if I need to make a long line move where people are at risk or HEC I WILL. Concentrate as if it’s my most important lift ever; because it is !,


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2690165 Notice he never gives you actual references, just (NT) +0/-0     
Author:generalized fictitious mentions
5/24/2021 10:16:30 PM

Reply to: 2690153


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2690713 Does FAA consider all flying past 14 hours of "duty" unsafe? +0/-0     
Author:They
5/30/2021 12:46:23 PM

Reply to: 2689802

can call it careless and reckless.  Depends.



Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2690771 So, all flying (piloting) by ANYONE, is careless & reckless? +0/-0     
Author:That's your premises!
5/30/2021 10:27:03 PM

Reply to: 2690713


Reply  Return-To-Index  
 
Msg ID: 2690772 So, all flying (piloting) by ANYONE, is careless & reckless? +0/-0     
Author:Deviant
5/30/2021 10:38:04 PM

Reply to: 2690771

After 14 hours of part 135. Yes. That could easily result in a violation if fatigue was found to be a causal factor. Everything is on the table after an accident or incident. You don't want to try to explain otherwise if you put yourself in that position.



Reply  Return-To-Index