"Uncontrolled" Airspace? At 1,800' MSL?? Class G? (NT)
Author:
Class E is controlled airspace
Date:
3/28/2026 10:33:09 AM
+0
/
-0
Show Orig. Msg (this window)
Or
In New Window
Reply
Return-To-Index
Display Full Msg Thread
Rules of Engagement
Terms of Use
United vs Army in California
+0
/
-0
Close Encounter 3/26/2026 6:25:25 PM
United vs Army in California
+1
/
-3
Anonymous 3/26/2026 7:55:03 PM
United vs Army in California
+0
/
-0
Hawk Driver 3/26/2026 9:03:16 PM
United vs Army in California
+1
/
-1
Anonymous 3/26/2026 9:04:25 PM
Sensationalist Journalist
+3
/
-1
Anonymous 3/26/2026 9:03:41 PM
Yep just another stupid Army crew
+0
/
-2
Idiots 3/27/2026 4:11:09 PM
Then, there is you!
+1
/
-0
In a league all your own! 3/27/2026 4:38:37 PM
Then, there is you!
+1
/
-0
JB 3/27/2026 7:02:49 PM
Settle down and look at the facts
+0
/
-0
Anonymous 3/28/2026 10:03:07 AM
"Uncontrolled" Airspace? At 1,800' MSL?? Class G? (NT)
+0
/
-0
Class E is controlled airspace 3/28/2026 10:33:09 AM
Class G
+0
/
-0
Depending On The Area... 3/28/2026 10:52:45 AM
Well, not were they were at. It starts at 700' agl and above (NT)
+0
/
-0
and, they were at 1,800', so it's Class E anyway 3/28/2026 10:59:19 AM
The reported showed over 500ft. The issue wasn't a "close call", but the
+1
/
-0
TCAS calculating a close call. 3/28/2026 11:08:27 AM
The reported showed over 500ft. The issue wasn't a (NT)
+0
/
-0
Yup! 3/29/2026 10:45:12 AM
Also, they were flying at an MSL altitude, ~ 1,800' (NT)
+0
/
-0
Anonymous 3/28/2026 11:21:52 AM
Also, they were flying at an MSL altitude, ~ 1,800'
+0
/
-0
Okay... 3/29/2026 10:48:22 AM
Who cares, since where they were at 1,800 MSL was clearly
+0
/
-0
in Class E (Controlled Airspace) 3/29/2026 11:14:05 AM
Oye
+1
/
-0
Anonymous 3/28/2026 9:59:38 PM