So, show the accidents where it was a problem enough

New Message Alert

Author: What even is your point Date: 11/24/2024 7:43:19 PM +0/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

There's no accidents directly attributable to your illegal flights so what, you want to make duty days longer? Are you an area manager that no one likes so they can't fill your bases and are trying to cut down on the amount of pilots you have to deal with?

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-0 the 14 hrs of duty. 11/24/2024 11:37:36 AM

Or, any Part 135 accident that pilot was on Part 91 leg after 14hrs of duty (NT) +0/-0 Either will do. 11/24/2024 11:50:40 AM

If you can plan within 14 hours, shut up and fly. There, saved (NT) +0/-3 You some work 11/24/2024 12:21:21 PM

If you can plan within 14 hours, shut up and fly. There, saved +0/-0 say wut 11/24/2024 12:38:41 PM

Wasn't the question! Do you know of an accidents where duty was more than (NT) +0/-0 14 hrs ?? Any examples?? 11/24/2024 12:39:56 PM

Wasn't the question! Do you know of an accidents where duty was more than +0/-1 yes 11/24/2024 1:27:54 PM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-1 Occured during what? 11/24/2024 1:34:56 PM

So, were they any accidents that occured in the after the 14th hr of duty +0/-0 in Part 135 or 91? 11/24/2024 2:04:30 PM

So, were they any accidents that occured in the after the 14th hr of duty +0/-0 Again 11/24/2024 2:19:27 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 Are there any accidents where... 11/24/2024 2:38:32 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 most companies 11/24/2024 8:16:19 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 Be that guy then 11/24/2024 8:20:26 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 no 11/24/2024 8:22:00 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 say wut 11/24/2024 8:24:52 PM

Part 91, tons of companies do it! Since time began... +0/-0 yet, no accidents can be cited?? 11/24/2024 9:22:35 PM

Part 91, tons of companies do it! Since time began... +0/-0 If you want overtime take an extra shift 11/24/2024 11:24:25 PM

It's not a "shift". It's simply exra duty time, and there isn't a limit (NT) +0/-0 under Part 91 11/25/2024 7:14:33 AM

You can plan to be on duty longer than 14 hrs for the Part 91 portion (NT) +0/-1 since it is Part 91! 11/24/2024 3:03:47 PM

Can you get an extension for a Part 135 flight beyond 14 hrs? (NT) +0/-0 Didn't think you legally do that! 11/24/2024 2:06:14 PM

Can you get an extension for a Part 135 flight beyond 14 hrs? +0/-0 Have you ever flown part 135? 11/24/2024 11:46:45 PM

The only unexpected circumstances that can extend your duty are +0/-0 the ones that happen in flight. 11/25/2024 7:18:35 AM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +1/-1 That Part 91 11/24/2024 3:51:41 PM

FAA voluntary disclosure. +1/-0 Anonymous 11/24/2024 4:30:46 PM

There is no exceedences for Part 91. You can't count it towards +0/-0 as required rest prior to next 135 flt 11/24/2024 4:42:08 PM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-0 you pretty much had to know 11/24/2024 4:33:04 PM

Weird that nobody can cite an accident that might prompt (NT) +0/-0 safety issues. 11/24/2024 4:45:31 PM

Weird that nobody can cite an accident that might prompt +0/-0 accident that might prompt 11/24/2024 5:24:15 PM

No accidents, yet a big cry about "safety" problems. +0/-0 Seems all the accidents happen 11/24/2024 6:00:07 PM

No accidents, yet a big cry about +0/-0 fatigue can be cumulative 11/24/2024 6:55:39 PM

So, show the accidents where it was a problem enough (NT) +0/-0 to cry about it! Part 91 is Part 91 11/24/2024 7:38:32 PM

So, show the accidents where it was a problem enough +0/-0 What even is your point 11/24/2024 7:43:19 PM

Point? I'm asking for examples of it causing accidents (NT) +0/-0 Provide some if you can, 11/24/2024 7:57:49 PM

Nothing is illegal to fly Part 91 past a 14 hour day. +0/-0 It's Part 91! 11/24/2024 9:26:33 PM

So, show the accidents where it was a problem enough +0/-0 yeah bro 11/24/2024 7:58:50 PM

Not under 135, but yeah, you can continue on duty +0/-0 for however long. Like, to 11/24/2024 9:17:54 PM

Sounds like a personal problem! So, where are the stats that is it a (NT) +0/-0 big problem (IOW, bigger than you) 11/24/2024 9:24:42 PM

there aren't any... (NT) +0/-0 you're welcome 11/24/2024 6:13:36 PM

there aren't any... +0/-0 this is so just helicopters 11/24/2024 9:33:16 PM

What reg's don't we know? The one that doesn't require you to end your (NT) +0/-0 duty day for Part 91 flights? 11/24/2024 10:22:00 PM

What reg's don't we know? The one that doesn't require you to end your +0/-0 say wut 11/24/2024 10:23:49 PM

why would I be upset over s non existing regulation? (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 11/24/2024 10:39:18 PM

why would I be upset over s non existing regulation? +0/-0 say wut 11/24/2024 10:53:13 PM

No, you've been saying there is a regulation limiting duty under Part 91 (NT) +0/-0 not me! 11/25/2024 7:13:09 AM

No, you've been saying there is a regulation limiting duty under Part 91 +0/-0 no 11/25/2024 9:40:55 AM

Yes, there really are some saying that!! (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 11/25/2024 11:36:39 AM

Everyone is saying it. I do the best 10 hours rest. (NT) +0/-0 Stupendous resting 11/25/2024 8:05:46 PM

WOW! Not a single accident cited yet! (NT) +0/-1 Interesting! 11/26/2024 7:52:47 AM

WOW! Not a single accident cited yet! +0/-0 okay 11/26/2024 8:08:26 AM

WOW! Not a single accident cited yet! +0/-0 this, of course, means 11/26/2024 11:55:53 AM

Then make it a universal rest requirement for every pilot regardless! (NT) +0/-1 No flying after 14 hrs of woke! 11/26/2024 1:21:09 PM

Private pilot's will have to show 10 hrs of sleep +0/-1 in the last 24hrs. no exceptions 11/26/2024 1:38:12 PM

Then make it a universal rest requirement for every pilot regardless! +0/-0 say wut 11/26/2024 4:17:49 PM

Then make it a universal rest requirement for every pilot regardless! +0/-0 That's a pretty good point actually 11/26/2024 10:05:38 PM

Then make it a universal rest requirement for every pilot regardless! +0/-0 I think 11/26/2024 10:12:11 PM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-0 Not 135, but... 11/26/2024 12:50:27 PM

Can you get me the NTSB case number? Link is returning embedded script +0/-0 See below: 11/27/2024 2:31:23 PM

Can you get me the NTSB case number? Link is returning embedded script +1/-0 NTSB # 11/27/2024 7:10:43 PM

Danke (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 11/27/2024 9:41:05 PM

Interesting read. I noticed the NTSB dismissed the engine surge incident +0/-0 and NVG being stowed. 11/28/2024 10:30:03 AM

Interesting read. I noticed the NTSB dismissed the engine surge incident +0/-0 no way 11/28/2024 10:49:26 AM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-0 Just go to work 12/2/2024 10:13:09 PM