So, were they any accidents that occured in the after the 14th hr of duty

Click here to close

New Message Alert

Author: in Part 135 or 91? Date: 11/24/2024 2:04:30 PM +0/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

Like on a Part 91 tail-end reposition flight that occurred after the 14hr Part 135 duty period elapsed?

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-0 the 14 hrs of duty. 11/24/2024 11:37:36 AM

Or, any Part 135 accident that pilot was on Part 91 leg after 14hrs of duty (NT) +0/-0 Either will do. 11/24/2024 11:50:40 AM

If you can plan within 14 hours, shut up and fly. There, saved (NT) +0/-3 You some work 11/24/2024 12:21:21 PM

If you can plan within 14 hours, shut up and fly. There, saved +0/-0 say wut 11/24/2024 12:38:41 PM

Wasn't the question! Do you know of an accidents where duty was more than (NT) +0/-0 14 hrs ?? Any examples?? 11/24/2024 12:39:56 PM

Wasn't the question! Do you know of an accidents where duty was more than +0/-1 yes 11/24/2024 1:27:54 PM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-1 Occured during what? 11/24/2024 1:34:56 PM

So, were they any accidents that occured in the after the 14th hr of duty +0/-0 in Part 135 or 91? 11/24/2024 2:04:30 PM

So, were they any accidents that occured in the after the 14th hr of duty +0/-0 Again 11/24/2024 2:19:27 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 Are there any accidents where... 11/24/2024 2:38:32 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 most companies 11/24/2024 8:16:19 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 Be that guy then 11/24/2024 8:20:26 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 no 11/24/2024 8:22:00 PM

It is all duty, but you can be on duty Part 91 indefinitely. +0/-0 say wut 11/24/2024 8:24:52 PM

Part 91, tons of companies do it! Since time began... +0/-0 yet, no accidents can be cited?? 11/24/2024 9:22:35 PM

Part 91, tons of companies do it! Since time began... +0/-0 If you want overtime take an extra shift 11/24/2024 11:24:25 PM

It's not a "shift". It's simply exra duty time, and there isn't a limit (NT) +0/-0 under Part 91 11/25/2024 7:14:33 AM

You can plan to be on duty longer than 14 hrs for the Part 91 portion (NT) +0/-1 since it is Part 91! 11/24/2024 3:03:47 PM

Can you get an extension for a Part 135 flight beyond 14 hrs? (NT) +0/-0 Didn't think you legally do that! 11/24/2024 2:06:14 PM

Can you get an extension for a Part 135 flight beyond 14 hrs? +0/-0 Have you ever flown part 135? 11/24/2024 11:46:45 PM

The only unexpected circumstances that can extend your duty are +0/-0 the ones that happen in flight. 11/25/2024 7:18:35 AM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +1/-1 That Part 91 11/24/2024 3:51:41 PM

FAA voluntary disclosure. +1/-0 Anonymous 11/24/2024 4:30:46 PM

There is no exceedences for Part 91. You can't count it towards +0/-0 as required rest prior to next 135 flt 11/24/2024 4:42:08 PM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-0 you pretty much had to know 11/24/2024 4:33:04 PM

Weird that nobody can cite an accident that might prompt (NT) +0/-0 safety issues. 11/24/2024 4:45:31 PM

Weird that nobody can cite an accident that might prompt +0/-0 accident that might prompt 11/24/2024 5:24:15 PM

No accidents, yet a big cry about "safety" problems. +0/-0 Seems all the accidents happen 11/24/2024 6:00:07 PM

No accidents, yet a big cry about +0/-0 fatigue can be cumulative 11/24/2024 6:55:39 PM

So, show the accidents where it was a problem enough (NT) +0/-0 to cry about it! Part 91 is Part 91 11/24/2024 7:38:32 PM

So, show the accidents where it was a problem enough +0/-0 What even is your point 11/24/2024 7:43:19 PM

Point? I'm asking for examples of it causing accidents (NT) +0/-0 Provide some if you can, 11/24/2024 7:57:49 PM

Nothing is illegal to fly Part 91 past a 14 hour day. +0/-0 It's Part 91! 11/24/2024 9:26:33 PM

So, show the accidents where it was a problem enough +0/-0 yeah bro 11/24/2024 7:58:50 PM

Not under 135, but yeah, you can continue on duty +0/-0 for however long. Like, to 11/24/2024 9:17:54 PM

Sounds like a personal problem! So, where are the stats that is it a (NT) +0/-0 big problem (IOW, bigger than you) 11/24/2024 9:24:42 PM

there aren't any... (NT) +0/-0 you're welcome 11/24/2024 6:13:36 PM

there aren't any... +0/-0 this is so just helicopters 11/24/2024 9:33:16 PM

What reg's don't we know? The one that doesn't require you to end your (NT) +0/-0 duty day for Part 91 flights? 11/24/2024 10:22:00 PM

What reg's don't we know? The one that doesn't require you to end your +0/-0 say wut 11/24/2024 10:23:49 PM

why would I be upset over s non existing regulation? (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 11/24/2024 10:39:18 PM

why would I be upset over s non existing regulation? +0/-0 say wut 11/24/2024 10:53:13 PM

No, you've been saying there is a regulation limiting duty under Part 91 (NT) +0/-0 not me! 11/25/2024 7:13:09 AM

No, you've been saying there is a regulation limiting duty under Part 91 +0/-0 no 11/25/2024 9:40:55 AM

Yes, there really are some saying that!! (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 11/25/2024 11:36:39 AM

Everyone is saying it. I do the best 10 hours rest. (NT) +0/-0 Stupendous resting 11/25/2024 8:05:46 PM

WOW! Not a single accident cited yet! (NT) +0/-1 Interesting! 11/26/2024 7:52:47 AM

WOW! Not a single accident cited yet! +0/-0 okay 11/26/2024 8:08:26 AM

WOW! Not a single accident cited yet! +0/-0 this, of course, means 11/26/2024 11:55:53 AM

Then make it a universal rest requirement for every pilot regardless! (NT) +0/-1 No flying after 14 hrs of woke! 11/26/2024 1:21:09 PM

Private pilot's will have to show 10 hrs of sleep +0/-1 in the last 24hrs. no exceptions 11/26/2024 1:38:12 PM

Then make it a universal rest requirement for every pilot regardless! +0/-0 say wut 11/26/2024 4:17:49 PM

Then make it a universal rest requirement for every pilot regardless! +0/-0 That's a pretty good point actually 11/26/2024 10:05:38 PM

Then make it a universal rest requirement for every pilot regardless! +0/-0 I think 11/26/2024 10:12:11 PM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-0 Not 135, but... 11/26/2024 12:50:27 PM

Can you get me the NTSB case number? Link is returning embedded script +0/-0 See below: 11/27/2024 2:31:23 PM

Can you get me the NTSB case number? Link is returning embedded script +1/-0 NTSB # 11/27/2024 7:10:43 PM

Danke (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 11/27/2024 9:41:05 PM

Interesting read. I noticed the NTSB dismissed the engine surge incident +0/-0 and NVG being stowed. 11/28/2024 10:30:03 AM

Interesting read. I noticed the NTSB dismissed the engine surge incident +0/-0 no way 11/28/2024 10:49:26 AM

Looking for HAA accidents that occured using Part 91 when pilot exceeded +0/-0 Just go to work 12/2/2024 10:13:09 PM