|
|
||
|
||
| Author: You know what's interesting? Date: 11/4/2024 5:58:23 PM +2/-3 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window | ||
That the Army had to put out videos on how to keep the pilots in 'Nam from killing themselves by mast bumping in Hueys and Cobras. I wonder if it's a coincidence that a decade later a bunch of helicopter pilots killed themselves mast bumping in Robbies... Wait, where did the majority of pilots come from in the 80's and 90's again? |
||
| Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use | ||
|
|
||
|
||
 The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell
+12/-2 Why it’s junk 11/4/2024 2:44:25 PM
 FSDO's don't stamp design approvals for Part 27 (NT)
+3/-0 Anonymous 11/4/2024 3:08:05 PM
FSDO's don't stamp design approvals for Part 27
+1/-7 No kidding 11/4/2024 3:46:48 PM
FAA's responsible for type certifying all aircraft!
+1/-1 But, not some FSDO lackey! 11/4/2024 4:03:59 PM
Cessna's aren't helicopters! MU-2 needs one.
+0/-1 You need an endorsement to fly a 11/4/2024 4:48:16 PM
Cessna's aren't helicopters! MU-2 needs one.
+1/-0 True 11/12/2024 10:00:22 AM
Every semi-rigid MRB system is prone to mast bumping and ALL are prone to (NT)
+0/-1 blade/tailrotor contact. 11/4/2024 3:40:51 PM
Not in the inherent way the Robinson is
+2/-2 Susceptibility 11/4/2024 3:45:18 PM
And, you seem to be incoherent to know that it is a perfectly fine design
+5/-0 when it stay's within it's envelope 11/4/2024 4:10:32 PM
How many wings fell off of Cessna 150s???
+1/-1 Primary trainer 11/4/2024 4:24:16 PM
But, there are LOTS of fatal accidents where pilot error was cited
+0/-1 Besides, your comparison is dishonest 11/4/2024 5:11:01 PM
But, there are LOTS of fatal accidents where pilot error was cited
+0/-1 Lived to Tell 11/4/2024 9:38:08 PM
But, there are LOTS of fatal accidents where pilot error was cited
+0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 11:33:27 PM
But, there are LOTS of fatal accidents where pilot error was cited 
+0/-1 Lived to Tell 11/5/2024 12:31:54 PM
There are three types of MR heads. A Bell and a Robinson (NT)
+0/-0 are in the same type: Semi-rigid 11/4/2024 4:12:25 PM
There are three types of MR heads. A Bell and a Robinson
+1/-2 the bell ain't got no 11/4/2024 4:19:21 PM
Because the blades flex more (NT)
+0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 4:37:18 PM
The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell
+2/-3 You know what's interesting? 11/4/2024 5:58:23 PM
The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell
+1/-3 You need educated 11/5/2024 12:34:25 AM
The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell
+0/-1 are you an aerospace engineer, if not 11/4/2024 6:09:52 PM
Yes it is. It's not rigid. It's not fully-articulating. (NT)
+0/-1 So, it's semi-rigid. 11/4/2024 6:42:57 PM
Yes it is. It's not rigid. It's not fully-articulating.
+0/-1 love it when the student pilots 11/4/2024 7:54:29 PM
love it when you wrong about everything (NT)
+0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 9:16:27 PM
Love it when "experts" turn out to be shown up (NT)
+0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 10:44:34 PM
Oops, you are right... NOT
+0/-0 Anonymous 11/4/2024 9:42:19 PM
That's a conning hinge genius (NT)
+0/-2 a doy 11/4/2024 6:52:57 PM
That's a conning hinge genius
+1/-1 Nope not exactly 11/5/2024 5:31:14 PM
That's a conning hinge genius
+0/-1 Yea 11/6/2024 9:43:40 AM
That's a conning hinge genius
+0/-1 Try again genius 11/6/2024 11:46:08 AM
That's a conning hinge genius
+1/-1 Put down your purse… 11/7/2024 12:45:15 AM
The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell
+1/-0 Semi rigid like Bell? 11/17/2024 10:08:27 AM
|
