FAA's responsible for type certifying all aircraft!

New Message Alert

Author: But, not some FSDO lackey! Date: 11/4/2024 4:03:59 PM +1/-1 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

And, they don't take it lightly (as you seem to be implying)!

The aircraft is certified to be flown within it's envelope. It's when someone takes it out of its envelope there are problems!

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +12/-2 Why it’s junk 11/4/2024 2:44:25 PM

FSDO's don't stamp design approvals for Part 27 (NT) +3/-0 Anonymous 11/4/2024 3:08:05 PM

FSDO's don't stamp design approvals for Part 27 +1/-7 No kidding 11/4/2024 3:46:48 PM

FAA's responsible for type certifying all aircraft! +1/-1 But, not some FSDO lackey! 11/4/2024 4:03:59 PM

Cessna's aren't helicopters! MU-2 needs one. +0/-1 You need an endorsement to fly a 11/4/2024 4:48:16 PM

Cessna's aren't helicopters! MU-2 needs one. +1/-0 True 11/12/2024 10:00:22 AM

Not in the inherent way the Robinson is +2/-2 Susceptibility 11/4/2024 3:45:18 PM

And, you seem to be incoherent to know that it is a perfectly fine design +5/-0 when it stay's within it's envelope 11/4/2024 4:10:32 PM

How many wings fell off of Cessna 150s??? +1/-1 Primary trainer 11/4/2024 4:24:16 PM

But, there are LOTS of fatal accidents where pilot error was cited +0/-1 Besides, your comparison is dishonest 11/4/2024 5:11:01 PM

+0/-1 Lived to Tell 11/5/2024 12:31:54 PM

There are three types of MR heads. A Bell and a Robinson (NT) +0/-0 are in the same type: Semi-rigid 11/4/2024 4:12:25 PM

There are three types of MR heads. A Bell and a Robinson +1/-2 the bell ain't got no 11/4/2024 4:19:21 PM

Because the blades flex more (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 4:37:18 PM

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +2/-3 You know what's interesting? 11/4/2024 5:58:23 PM

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +1/-3 You need educated 11/5/2024 12:34:25 AM

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +0/-1 are you an aerospace engineer, if not 11/4/2024 6:09:52 PM

Yes it is. It's not rigid. It's not fully-articulating. (NT) +0/-1 So, it's semi-rigid. 11/4/2024 6:42:57 PM

Yes it is. It's not rigid. It's not fully-articulating. +0/-1 love it when the student pilots 11/4/2024 7:54:29 PM

love it when you wrong about everything (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 9:16:27 PM

Love it when "experts" turn out to be shown up (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 10:44:34 PM

Oops, you are right... NOT +0/-0 Anonymous 11/4/2024 9:42:19 PM

That's a conning hinge genius (NT) +0/-2 a doy 11/4/2024 6:52:57 PM

That's a conning hinge genius +1/-1 Nope not exactly 11/5/2024 5:31:14 PM

That's a conning hinge genius +0/-1 Yea 11/6/2024 9:43:40 AM

That's a conning hinge genius +0/-1 Try again genius 11/6/2024 11:46:08 AM

That's a conning hinge genius +1/-1 Put down your purse… 11/7/2024 12:45:15 AM

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +1/-0 Semi rigid like Bell? 11/17/2024 10:08:27 AM