Law enforcement helicopters and floats for overwater

New Message Alert

Author: I know Date: 1/16/2024 12:26:03 PM +1/-2 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

it depends on how far from land they go. Back mid-late 80's PHI had an S76A stationed at Pitin Bay Island. THe were aloud to remove floats for wt savings & they were operating for Cleveland Medical Center. 1st S76 Medevac because of the oil glut & they were parked not making any revunue,

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Law enforcement helicopters and floats for overwater +0/-1 required single engine? 1/16/2024 10:52:06 AM

Law enforcement helicopters and floats for overwater +1/-2 I know 1/16/2024 12:26:03 PM

Law enforcement helicopters and floats for overwater +1/-1 whoa 1/16/2024 12:43:46 PM

Law enforcement helicopters and floats for overwater +1/-0 PFD 1/16/2024 3:05:06 PM

Law enforcement helicopters and floats for overwater +0/-1 At least it wom't catch fire 1/16/2024 3:22:34 PM

Yes, they are required public use or civil use outside operational +1/-0 glide distance from shore 1/16/2024 3:52:03 PM

Prove you wrong? Gladly! +4/-0 Rule Reader 1/16/2024 4:34:08 PM

Yes, they are required public use or civil use outside operational +1/-0 LEO's 1/16/2024 5:29:37 PM

91.205 [B] [12] spells it out: +0/-0 olderendirt 1/16/2024 6:14:16 PM

If compensated, they are for “hire” so let’s say they are paid by the city +0/-0 For a Bay Area or Beach Patrol 1/16/2024 7:35:11 PM

Then they'd also need an FAA operator's certificate or common carrier +0/-0 certificate. But, alas.... 1/16/2024 9:17:02 PM

Nor are they civil aircraft as contemplated under the applicability (NT) +0/-0 subsection 91.205(a) 1/17/2024 8:43:50 AM

Yes, they are required public use or civil use outside operational +0/-1 Anonymous 1/17/2024 6:24:41 AM

Read the applicability subpart to see if it says +1/-0 "... no civil aircraft..." 1/17/2024 8:46:13 AM

Using you logic The US Navy And Coast Guard +0/-0 Let's Go Brandon 1/17/2024 9:09:40 PM

you only need vests for 91.205. no floats (NT) +2/-0 required. 1/17/2024 7:43:09 AM

Part 91.205(a): applies to civil aircraft, not public +1/-0 Public operators are not required 1/17/2024 8:42:29 AM

Law enforcement helicopters and floats for overwater +4/-0 The Rule Decoder 1/17/2024 10:05:54 AM

not required for public aircraft regardless. An airworthiness certificate (NT) +0/-0 does not make it a civil aircraft! 1/17/2024 10:16:38 AM

Then what have an airworthiness certificate? (NT) +0/-0 What's the benefit for public use? 1/17/2024 11:40:55 AM

Look up and read AC91-91, it explains it! (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 1/17/2024 1:24:08 PM

floats are not reqiuired for any aircraft..... (NT) +1/-0 you're welcome 1/17/2024 6:15:22 PM

So, what's section (d) of this FAR about? +0/-0 Anonymous 1/17/2024 9:47:27 PM

So, what's section (d) of this FAR about? +0/-0 PFD 1/17/2024 10:39:40 PM

Different Parts? Well, I'm not the one who said "floats are not required +0/-0 for any aircraft"! 1/18/2024 7:10:46 AM

Different Parts? Well, I'm not the one who said "floats are not required +0/-0 nice try... 1/18/2024 2:30:14 PM

But, you are still incorrect then! +0/-0 Public operators are not required 1/18/2024 4:09:54 PM

Different Parts? Well, I'm not the one who said "floats are not required +0/-0 PFD 1/18/2024 11:15:57 PM

Have you been drinking... (NT) +0/-0 or are you just retarded? 1/19/2024 2:33:11 PM

Law enforcement helicopters and floats for overwater +0/-0 Get the 1/19/2024 1:36:16 PM

Law enforcement helicopters and floats for overwater +0/-0 Flipper PD? 1/19/2024 2:31:10 PM