Ah, then that would also be true with the CBA!

New Message Alert

Author: [Both contract were pre-bankruptcy] Date: 1/2/2024 9:40:39 PM +0/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

CBA doesn't make it any more secure than other employee contracts. If bankruptcy can ignore the one, it can ignore the other

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

GMR Retention Bonus +1/-6 10K In the bag 1/1/2024 3:34:07 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +0/-3 Elon 1/1/2024 4:16:37 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +3/-0 Old guy 1/1/2024 6:47:02 PM

GMR Retention Bonus (NT) +0/-2 lol 1/1/2024 6:48:59 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +8/-0 Anonymous 1/1/2024 7:29:34 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +3/-1 I'm In 1/2/2024 8:39:27 AM

GMR Retention Bonus "HOLDING" money for you (NT) +3/-1 SCAM! Won't see a dime. 1/2/2024 8:32:44 AM

GMR Retention Bonus "HOLDING" money for you +1/-0 Former GMR 1/2/2024 9:07:10 AM

GMR Retention Bonus "HOLDING" money for you +1/-0 why would a lawyer know 1/2/2024 10:53:42 AM

AMC paid because of the CBA and Union.....GMR has no obligation to do so in (NT) +0/-0 during GMR bankruptcy 1/2/2024 11:14:57 AM

AMC paid because of the CBA and Union.....GMR has no obligation to do so in +0/-0 yeah but 1/2/2024 11:30:18 AM

AMC wasn't obligated to pay it retention bonus because of the CBA or Union! +1/-0 They were required because... 1/2/2024 3:01:58 PM

You wish! It's in the CBA, it's a legal binding agreement. Without it there (NT) +2/-1 They could have withheld. 1/2/2024 3:36:22 PM

The promise was made way before the CBA! They would owe it regardless (NT) +0/-1 of the CBA or the Union. Sorry! 1/2/2024 3:39:45 PM

IOWs, they would have had to pay it even if the CBA ratification failed! (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 1/2/2024 3:40:42 PM

IOWs, no they didnt and no court could force them to (NT) +0/-0 Bankruptcy could have bailed them out 1/2/2024 7:20:56 PM

Maybe if they totally liquidated under chapter 7, but not here! Those +0/-0 retention bonus was earned wages 1/3/2024 9:00:54 AM

False. No legal obligation to pay and no court could force them (NT) +0/-0 To pay. Especially w/ bankruptcy 1/2/2024 7:20:01 PM

Ah, then that would also be true with the CBA! +0/-0 [Both contract were pre-bankruptcy] 1/2/2024 9:40:39 PM

Ah, then that would also be true with the CBA! +0/-0 research 1/2/2024 10:16:29 PM

what applies to one, applies to the other! +0/-0 Bonuses were owed! They pay 1/3/2024 8:47:31 AM

AMC promised new aircraft and autopilots for all in an email. Are they (NT) +0/-0 Legally bound to produce them? 1/3/2024 9:04:49 AM

AMC promised new aircraft and autopilots for all in an email. Are they +0/-0 say wut 1/3/2024 2:35:14 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +0/-1 Wait what? I thought 1/2/2024 11:06:04 AM

GMR Retention Bonus changed from $ every year to holding it (NT) +1/-0 until the end 1/2/2024 11:15:37 AM

GMR Retention Bonus changed from $ every year to holding it

+1/-0 anony 1/2/2024 2:54:59 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +0/-0 isn't that nice 1/2/2024 3:28:26 PM

Any inflation or interest growth in your money they are holding so niecely (NT) +0/-0 for you.... 1/2/2024 3:37:26 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +0/-0 yeah it's in the bag 1/2/2024 3:57:48 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +1/-0 Anonymous 1/2/2024 8:15:34 PM

one union troll (NT) +0/-0 talking to himself. lol 1/2/2024 4:12:58 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +4/-0 GMRr 1/2/2024 4:35:01 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +0/-0 Big bucks 1/2/2024 6:35:53 PM

GMR Retention Bonus +0/-0 AMC paid out over $20 Mil 1/2/2024 6:54:20 PM

Thanks to the Union and new contract! GMR played all of you fools!!!! (NT) +0/-1 AMC got mine! 1/2/2024 7:22:44 PM

Again, Union and new CBA had ZERO to do with it! (NT) +0/-0 5hey were obligated to pay it regardless 1/2/2024 9:46:38 PM

Again, Union and new CBA had ZERO to do with it! +0/-1 The low IQ 1/3/2024 8:07:03 AM

Again, Union and new CBA had ZERO to do with it! +0/-0 The low IQ 1/3/2024 8:07:04 AM

Exactly. CBA is a contract. Bonus put in contract. AMC required to pay it. (NT) +0/-0 GMR nada. Thanks Union!! 1/3/2024 9:06:15 AM

They would have had to pay it anyway, union or not! (NT) +0/-0 Wages were already earned! 1/3/2024 9:11:51 AM

Bonuses are not earned wages. You are confused (NT) +0/-0 Different in eyes of the court 1/3/2024 4:57:42 PM

once the have been earned, yes they are! +0/-0 you've already earned the money by... 1/4/2024 6:51:26 PM

Wages earned are paid first! Bankruptsy 101 +0/-1 Union or no Union! 1/3/2024 9:06:37 AM

Wages earned are paid first! Bankruptsy 101 +0/-1 says the dudebro 1/3/2024 12:20:33 PM

one union troll (NT) +0/-0 talking to himself. lol 1/3/2024 2:57:23 PM

Scraps is all that is +0/-1 A joke after taxes 1/6/2024 7:55:37 PM

when trolls collide (NT) +1/-0 lol 1/7/2024 2:44:01 PM