|
|
||
|
||
| Author: AIRSPACE Date: 1/2/2024 4:45:43 PM +0/-2 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window | ||
looks like this was inside the class C surface area. seems like the drone would need permission to be there and the operator would fcing additional FAA issues as a result? Hopefully they make an example of this idiot |
||
| Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use | ||
|
|
||
|
||
 Drone “Pilot”
+0/-0 “Pilot” 1/2/2024 10:09:39 AM
 Had a drone real estate photographer pull up next door....
+0/-3 [I was biting my tongue] 1/2/2024 10:41:37 AM
Had a drone real estate photographer pull up next door....
+1/-3 so what was so 1/2/2024 11:00:52 AM
Had a drone real estate photographer pull up next door....
+2/-2 Fat man 1/2/2024 11:47:13 AM
Had a drone real estate photographer pull up next door....
+2/-4 so don't fly 1/2/2024 11:54:20 AM
Had a drone real estate photographer pull up next door....
+1/-1 oh wait 1/2/2024 12:00:15 PM
that's a safety risk to motorists. not keeping line-of-sight
+0/-2 is a risk to aircraft. 1/2/2024 12:09:56 PM
that's a safety risk to motorists. not keeping line-of-sight
+0/-2 you don't know if 1/2/2024 12:18:56 PM
You don't know what I know or don't know, sis! (NT)
+1/-2 [trust me though, that I do know] 1/2/2024 2:42:41 PM
You don't know what I know or don't know, sis!
+0/-2 you already said 1/2/2024 3:00:28 PM
No... I bet you he wasn't (NT)
+1/-3 It's like liar's poker, lil sis! 1/2/2024 3:33:20 PM
No... I bet you he wasn't
+0/-1 sounds like 1/2/2024 3:56:18 PM
No... I bet you he wasn't
+0/-2 AIRSPACE 1/2/2024 4:45:43 PM
No... I bet you he wasn't
+0/-1 I agree 1/3/2024 12:03:21 PM
Drone “Pilot”
+1/-1 Old School 1/3/2024 3:51:46 PM
|
