|
|
||
|
||
| Author: gave teh impression you ... Date: 3/6/2023 11:45:38 PM +0/-7 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window | ||
.... technically didn't work for them, yet you did, like in a contract pilot or something as such. If you said, "I didn't work for them", or "I never worked for them" it might have been more than a technicality.
|
||
| Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use | ||
|
|
||
|
||
 AMC
+0/-1 Dilemma 3/6/2023 8:49:40 PM
 What do you mean by "I actually work for them"? (NT)
+0/-0 how did they get your SSN ?? 3/6/2023 9:23:26 PM
*What do you mean by "I didn't actually work for them"? (NT)
+0/-0 * corrected 3/6/2023 9:25:24 PM
What do you mean by "I actually work for them"?
+8/-1 I mean 3/6/2023 11:12:46 PM
The "didn't actually work" vs "didn't work"
+0/-7 gave teh impression you ... 3/6/2023 11:45:38 PM
The "didn't actually work" vs "didn't work"
+8/-1 the sheer idiocy of just helicopters 3/7/2023 1:12:01 AM
The "didn't actually work" vs "didn't work"
+7/-1 OP 3/7/2023 8:22:37 AM
wasn't a grammar lesson. it was a question of clarification (NT)
+1/-4 didn't need to get so prissy about it! 3/7/2023 8:58:10 AM
AMC
+5/-1 Ship 3/7/2023 8:26:03 AM
AMC
+1/-1 OP 3/7/2023 8:35:53 AM
it didn't offend, it confused. sounded like a hidden meaning . bugger off (NT)
+0/-6 if asking for clarification offends you! 3/7/2023 9:01:54 AM
AMC
+3/-1 New interview trick? 3/7/2023 9:53:02 AM
How would it be a tax fraud if they "actually" paid him? (NT)
+0/-4 actually? 3/7/2023 10:05:07 AM
How would it be a tax fraud if they "actually" paid him?
+2/-0 OP 3/7/2023 10:33:39 AM
where in this thread did you ever say that?
+1/-1 maybe that why it's being asked! 3/7/2023 10:55:23 AM
AMC
+0/-1 OP 3/7/2023 10:31:59 AM
Did you receive any money along with W2, or was it just
+1/-2 the W2 with no corresponding payments? 3/7/2023 10:45:37 AM
AMC
+0/-3 you'd have to be a complete 3/7/2023 10:46:23 AM
AMC
+0/-1 Please 3/7/2023 8:44:28 PM
AMC
+0/-1 Good 3/7/2023 8:43:00 PM
|
