Why are there no medical standards for (NT)

Click here to close

New Message Alert

Author: medical crew members? Date: 1/27/2023 7:07:57 AM +4/-1

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Why are there no medical standards for (NT) +4/-1 medical crew members? 1/27/2023 7:07:57 AM

Why are there no medical standards for +1/-4 why 1/27/2023 7:16:59 AM

Why are there no medical standards for +2/-0 Yah.... 1/27/2023 7:17:21 AM

Why are there no medical standards for +0/-0 Dumb guy 1/27/2023 7:44:02 AM

Why are there no medical standards for (NT) +0/-0 Yes 1/27/2023 7:51:35 AM

Why are there no medical standards for +1/-0 Here 1/27/2023 8:03:00 AM

Why are there no medical standards for +4/-2 why should there be 1/27/2023 8:36:24 AM

yes it would. if they have a paying passenger/patient +3/-1 they can't tend to "it" anymore.... 1/27/2023 9:44:06 AM

yes it would. if they have a paying passenger/patient (NT) +0/-0 passenger taking care of passenger 1/27/2023 11:44:26 AM

yes it would. if they have a paying passenger/patient +0/-1 they can't tend to "it" anymore.... 1/27/2023 3:22:10 PM

Why are there no medical standards for +1/-0 Not so fast 1/28/2023 11:25:46 AM

Why are there no medical standards for +0/-0 what counts is what 1/28/2023 6:39:05 PM

Oh, so a safety pilot along to let you fly under the hood (NT) +0/-0 doesn't need to be sober? 1/29/2023 11:50:53 AM

Try to focus... (NT) +0/-0 what's your point? 1/29/2023 4:08:46 PM

but if one were drunk as a skunk and the other high (NT) +0/-0 on speedos, with a patient aboard.... 1/30/2023 7:01:45 AM

Why are there no medical standards for +1/-0 because they are not 1/27/2023 6:17:33 PM

correct except +0/-2 Anonymous 1/27/2023 6:27:32 PM

correct except +0/-0 Company 1/27/2023 7:09:55 PM

correct except +0/-0 and so is the person 1/27/2023 7:21:45 PM

correct except +0/-0 :-) 1/28/2023 2:07:54 AM

correct except +0/-0 flight attendants are crew members 1/28/2023 7:17:09 AM

correct except +1/-0 Ok 1/28/2023 8:35:32 AM

correct except +0/-0 flight attendants 1/28/2023 4:21:50 PM

correct except +0/-0 why 1/28/2023 6:16:49 PM

"...not safety sensitive"... yet, they are required to safely land (NT) +0/-0 a helicopter in an HNVGO...?? Hmmm 1/28/2023 9:54:08 PM

"...not safety sensitive"... yet, they are required to safely land +0/-1 What? 1/29/2023 6:27:45 AM

Not in an aircraft who's RFM requires an additional person, I hope! +1/-0 Anonymous 1/29/2023 10:58:16 AM

once again REFER TO THE FARS.... +0/-0 your opinion on the matter 1/29/2023 10:48:16 AM

Actually, you are a crewmember by definition! +0/-0 Not a passenger! 1/29/2023 11:07:33 AM

Why are there no medical standards for +0/-1 Think 1/28/2023 5:07:01 PM

Medical flight crew members can cancel +0/-0 flights and tell pilots what to do. 1/29/2023 11:34:59 AM

Bingo! Had one Program Manager tell me I PIC, but he was the mission +0/-0 commander, & I need to do it his way.. 1/29/2023 12:03:31 PM

Bingo! Had one Program Manager tell me I PIC, but he was the mission +0/-0 Ok 1/29/2023 1:22:29 PM

Bingo! Had one Program Manager tell me I PIC, but he was the mission +0/-0 FAR part 135 1/29/2023 1:29:53 PM

where in FAR 135 does it say a flight attendant is crew too? But, they are +0/-0 just like medical crewmembers are! 1/29/2023 1:48:15 PM

BTW, FAR 1.1 is also where is say you are a flight crewmember too! (NT) +0/-0 since it doesn't in 135! 1/29/2023 1:54:13 PM

BTW, FAR 1.1 is also where is say you are a flight crewmember too! +0/-0 Except it does 1/29/2023 3:33:14 PM

Nah, that doesn't DEFINE a flight crewmember +0/-0 FAR 1.1 does. 1/29/2023 4:03:54 PM

Nah, that doesn't DEFINE a flight crewmember +0/-0 135.241 1/29/2023 4:13:07 PM

Nah, that doesn't DEFINE a flight crewmember +0/-0 Why 1/29/2023 4:39:41 PM

They are crewmembers, not passengers. They have an assigned duty +0/-0 on the aircraft. 1/29/2023 5:02:33 PM

where in FAR 135 does it say a flight attendant is crew too? But, they are +0/-0 FAR Part 120 1/29/2023 3:09:54 PM

where in FAR 135 does it say a flight attendant is crew too? But, they are +0/-0 135.273 1/29/2023 4:16:40 PM

FAA's been calling them crewmembers for over 3 decades! +0/-0 FAA Chief Council Letter: 1/29/2023 2:17:40 PM

FAA's been calling them crewmembers for over 3 decades! +0/-0 Ok 1/29/2023 4:08:42 PM

Modern Times..... +0/-0 I don't write them, I just report them 1/31/2023 9:02:02 AM

Where in 135.601 does it say "passenger", if you point is that (NT) +0/-0 it doesn't say "crewmember"? 1/31/2023 9:04:35 AM

so why do they have to get crewmembers training each year? (NT) +0/-0 so i can skip the full passenger brief? 1/29/2023 1:35:55 PM

so why do they have to get crewmembers training each year? +0/-0 FAR part 120 1/29/2023 3:01:30 PM

Negative, they are ALL crewmembers. +0/-0 Anonymous 1/29/2023 5:05:09 PM

OPSPEC A002 Definitions and Abbreviations +0/-0 Anonymous 1/29/2023 5:23:46 PM

OPSPEC A002 Definitions and Abbreviations +0/-0 Great 1/29/2023 6:03:56 PM

OPSPEC A002 Definitions and Abbreviations +0/-0 Dope 1/29/2023 7:20:53 PM

OPSPEC A002 Definitions and Abbreviations +0/-0 Dope 1/29/2023 8:04:31 PM

yet, they are trained to perform many flight Attendant duties and they are +0/-0 required crewmembers for HNVGO* 1/29/2023 8:06:31 PM

yet, they are trained to perform many flight Attendant duties and they are +0/-0 Dope 1/29/2023 8:19:12 PM

yet, they are trained to perform many flight Attendant duties and they are +0/-0 Dope 1/29/2023 8:21:37 PM

So back to 91.17. The ONLY way a certificate holder can be assured its +0/-0 crewmembers, who may be required 1/29/2023 8:49:53 PM

yet, they are trained to perform many flight Attendant duties and they are +0/-0 the are only required for NVGOs 1/29/2023 8:23:19 PM

yet, they are trained to perform many flight Attendant duties and they are +0/-0 Dope 1/29/2023 8:30:26 PM

yet, they are trained to perform many flight Attendant duties and they are +0/-0 Dope 1/29/2023 8:47:46 PM

STC for NVG mod in your RFM is where (NT) +1/-0 the requirement comes from 1/30/2023 5:48:27 PM