Members voted for a CBA in 2017 and the language remaind

New Message Alert

Author: one for one standard! Date: 1/15/2023 12:20:33 PM +0/-1 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

The only thing the union did was not let any grievances go past them from members who took issue that the CBA was (and still is) being violated.

Members voted for a CBA with specific language in it, so it's not up the a few interlopers to change the CBA with a LOA without the member's consent! Why have a CBA if immediately after it is voted on and ratified one or two guys in the union can change it on their own?

Current CBA has the standard schedule of one-for-one, not 7 and 7. You can't "protect" what you don't currently own!

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Union is trying to "protect" something it doesn't have. Since when is the +0/-2 Standard schedule is 7 and 7? 1/14/2023 11:42:19 PM

Union is trying to "protect" something it doesn't have. Since when is the +1/-2 Well 1/15/2023 8:36:29 AM

What union? +2/-3 The clown show is over 1/15/2023 9:06:45 AM

A 14/14 would be a great schedule! Imagine, two weeks off straight (NT) +0/-1 every month! An airliner's dream line! 1/15/2023 10:00:44 AM

A 14/14 would be a great schedule! Imagine, two weeks off straight +1/-1 ever done it? 1/15/2023 10:22:58 AM

Actually, yes I have, and I'd do it again in a heartbeat! (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 1/15/2023 10:29:44 AM

Actually, yes I have, and I'd do it again in a heartbeat! +0/-1 so go do it then 1/15/2023 10:46:47 AM

Actually, yes I have, and I'd do it again in a heartbeat! +0/-1 if you've done it 1/15/2023 10:49:02 AM

Telling YOU to imagine it! Imagine it again, for me! +0/-2 Was doing it, then union gave away 1/15/2023 11:07:17 AM

A 14/14 would be a great schedule! Imagine, two weeks off straight +0/-1 Gear Head 1/16/2023 11:35:50 AM

My maintenance guy comes in M-F for about 3 hrs and leaves. (NT) +0/-0 Comes back on rare occasion OOS 1/22/2023 11:45:34 PM

Could force a 4/3/or 5/2. current LOA standard is 7/7 (NT) +0/-1 Why would company want to break that? 1/15/2023 11:16:26 AM

Current "standard" is NOT that! Where do you come up with that? +0/-1 CBA says one for one! 1/15/2023 11:22:26 AM

4/3 split is 4 shifts ON, 3 shifts OFF- then 3 shifts ON, 4 shifts off +1/-1 Are u really this dumb 1/15/2023 12:05:33 PM

4/3 split is a 4 day, 3 night/7 off; or a 3 day, 4 night/7 off +0/-1 Still meets 1 for 1 standard schedule! 1/15/2023 12:23:52 PM

8/8 huh? Not a smart one are you? (NT) +0/-1 DuuuuumbaZz 1/15/2023 5:36:37 PM

Current "standard" is NOT that! Where do you come up with that? +0/-1 lol 1/15/2023 12:18:44 PM

Not exactly.... 7/7 is a straight schedule. 4/3 (3/4) is a split schedule +0/-1 The 4/3 or 3/4 is really a ..... 1/15/2023 12:27:20 PM

7/7 has been the in writing standard since 2015 Schedules with A,B,C,D (NT) +0/-0 Union and Company written agreement 1/15/2023 11:20:10 AM

Nope! CBA is the written agreement and it's not in there +0/-1 Union did roll over however, and... 1/15/2023 11:30:10 AM

Wow. Someone woke up with fake news and a whiney attempt at smearing (NT) +1/-0 Not a good reader we see 1/15/2023 12:01:42 PM

Facts are facts. Union rolled over and is still playing dead here! (NT) +0/-1 Facts are facts! 1/15/2023 2:55:49 PM

Yes the union did roll over under PHPA rule in 2014/15. They haven�t since +0/-0 Which is why they want it ALL in 1/15/2023 12:06:57 PM

Members voted for a CBA in 2017 and the language remaind +0/-1 one for one standard! 1/15/2023 12:20:33 PM

Your missing key language in the CBA and also the policy agreements (NT) +0/-0 You have zero clue on reality 1/15/2023 12:56:07 PM

Black and White "Key Language" is in the CBA +0/-1 policy is for union to ignore it! 1/15/2023 2:53:03 PM

Yes the union did roll over under PHPA rule in 2014/15. They haven�t since +0/-0 Which is why they want it ALL in 1/15/2023 12:06:57 PM

If one party doesn�t agree to something in the contract then it is actually (NT) +0/-0 Being threatened or the intent is there 1/15/2023 11:21:13 AM

are you implying the union doesn't like the (its) standard schedule? (NT) +0/-0 (e.g., one for one) 1/15/2023 3:08:06 PM

are you implying the company doesn't like the (its) standard schedule? (NT) +0/-0 Company guy 1/15/2023 5:37:18 PM

Company likes it, because they can make it anything they want to as long as (NT) +0/-1 its a one-for-one schedule! 1/15/2023 6:37:44 PM

Union is trying to "protect" something it doesn't have. Since when is the +0/-2 771414 1/15/2023 7:40:44 PM

Union is trying to "protect" something it doesn't have. Since when is the +0/-0 14/14 1/22/2023 5:59:42 PM

Union is trying to "protect" something it doesn't have. Since when is the +0/-0 7 and 7 question 1/17/2023 6:00:07 PM

As do weekends! +0/-0 Anonymous 1/18/2023 3:24:37 PM