Big problem brewing at 109, as they intend to mix Check Airman

New Message Alert

Author: Olderguy Date: 10/1/2022 12:50:29 PM +0/-3 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

It is illegal to discriminate the basis of age. 121 carriers fo it because of FAA refs. There is no 135 age restroctopi. The clause is illegal on its face. That is the problem.

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Big problem brewing at 109, as they intend to mix Check Airman +0/-3 with Line Pilots under one Local 9/30/2022 10:13:03 PM

Airlines +1/-1 do it 9/30/2022 10:36:03 PM

Airlines +3/-1 How many CA? 10/1/2022 5:44:31 AM

See CA's, the union already admits it doesn't care about YOUR problems! (NT) +0/-2 DEMAND your own LOCAL designation' 10/1/2022 8:36:40 AM

Um, no they don't! (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 10/1/2022 8:35:03 AM

Um, no they don't! (NT) +0/-1 Um, Yes They Do 10/1/2022 9:30:59 AM

Name the airline and union! (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 10/1/2022 9:50:35 AM

Name the airline and union! +0/-1 nt 10/1/2022 10:30:38 AM

That's because they are LINE HOLDERS, including IOE +1/-1 If they are not LINE HOLDERS, 10/1/2022 12:22:08 PM

IOS's, the NMB has determined them in the SAME Category/Class (NT) +0/-1 not different, as they have in AMC 10/1/2022 12:26:34 PM

United: Single Class and Craft for pilots -and- instructors +0/-1 Behold: 10/1/2022 12:31:28 PM

Name the airline and union! +1/-3 Office Professionals Don’t Represent 10/2/2022 4:39:18 PM

Big problem brewing at 109, as they intend to mix Check Airman +1/-1 this 10/1/2022 9:58:29 AM

Conflict of interests, relegated to "committee", not represented +0/-1 on EB equally, mixing of dues funds.... 10/1/2022 10:04:29 AM

Seems to be okay in 108 +1/-1 same list at PHI 10/1/2022 10:44:27 AM

108? That EB doesn't even mention them in their meetings, other than to (NT) +0/-1 acknowledge their revenue (dues) stream 10/1/2022 10:56:01 AM

108? That EB doesn't even mention them in their meetings, other than to +0/-3 Olderguy 10/1/2022 11:35:33 AM

The union unilaterally rolled over on that. Now, they created (NT) +0/-2 a hypocrisy in their CBA 10/1/2022 11:49:49 AM

Seems to be fine, not many of them +0/-1 And they don't seem to want a base 10/1/2022 2:19:40 PM

Big problem brewing at 109, as they intend to mix Check Airman +0/-1 What's the problem? 10/1/2022 12:20:47 PM

Big problem brewing at 109, as they intend to mix Check Airman (NT) +0/-1 Olderguy 10/1/2022 12:48:17 PM

Big problem brewing at 109, as they intend to mix Check Airman +0/-3 Olderguy 10/1/2022 12:50:29 PM

Funny. Didn’t hear or see you on the member meeting today voicing your (NT) +1/-1 Critical concerns..hmmm. Scared? 10/1/2022 2:08:11 PM

Just JM and PL crying anonymously again. Nothing to see (NT) +0/-1 Nothing at all 10/1/2022 2:08:49 PM

The Problem with the 109 is that they +0/-3 wrote their By Laws (greenbook) 10/1/2022 2:34:49 PM

Local 109 CAN strike and conduct work actions no different than the airline (NT) +0/-2 And ALPA. Stop your lies 10/1/2022 6:26:22 PM

Yup, but only AFTER allowed to do so by the NMB (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 10/2/2022 6:23:28 AM

A Membership Meeting at 0630 A.M. (NT) +0/-1 How nice of you to invite us! 10/1/2022 2:54:32 PM

You don’t read the updates do you. Started at 0700 pacific time (NT) +0/-1 Too early for snowflakes 10/1/2022 6:25:33 PM

Mailed @ 2331.... had a year to plan it, and you last +0/-2 minute it. Not very professional... 10/2/2022 8:51:21 AM

How many at the meeting today? What did they vote on? (NT) +0/-1 Anything? 10/1/2022 3:04:03 PM

Big problem brewing at 109, as they intend to mix Check Airman +1/-2 Ever notice 10/2/2022 12:35:43 AM

Big problem brewing at 109, as they intend to mix Check Airman +0/-1 Any 10/4/2022 9:43:04 PM