|
Again, not a Part 135 flight! And, crew was within the Part 121 duty
|
|
|
Author: requirements. Seems FO abused... Date:
6/29/2022 11:39:37 PM +0/-0
Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or
In New Window
|
... rest requirements. Wasn't a regulatory failure, but a failure-to-follow-the-regulatory failure. The two examples you gave had the common demoninator beign the FO was a female, however.
Again, looking for Part 135 accidents that were attributed duty day/rest factors.
Thanks for your contribution, but not germane |
|
Reply
Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread
Rules of Engagement
Terms of Use |
|
|
Q: How many accidents can you think of that are attributed to Part 135 (NT)
+1/-1 Duty/Rest violations or issues? 6/28/2022 2:33:44 PM
|