This doesn’t look good for this program

Click here to close

New Message Alert

Author: Dumb Date: 1/27/2022 11:16:32 AM +0/-1 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

388X30 is 11,640 r yard....

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

This doesn’t look good for this program +3/-2 New York Bell 429 crash update 1/26/2022 12:02:56 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +3/-1 how this happens 1/26/2022 12:08:05 PM

Clearly this is on that pilot. But there are always contributing factors +11/-2 With their environment 1/26/2022 12:11:26 PM

Clearly this is on that pilot. But there are always contributing factors +0/-2 he didn't 1/26/2022 12:18:19 PM

He or she checked every box of what not to do (NT) +2/-1 Shouldn’t even have a license 1/26/2022 12:25:11 PM

He or she checked every box of what not to do +0/-2 accidents happen 1/26/2022 12:40:20 PM

No, they don’t “just” happen. Especially in this accident. +2/-1 Don’t fool yourself. 1/26/2022 12:43:59 PM

No, they don’t “just” happen. Especially in this accident. +1/-3 oh boy 1/26/2022 12:46:07 PM

No, they don’t “just” happen. Especially in this accident. +0/-2 I didn't read the part 1/26/2022 12:47:24 PM

Apparently flying around with scattered clouds about +0/-0 is IMC to this guy 1/26/2022 12:57:25 PM

Why don’t you check the weather at KGBQ for the time he set up for an +0/-1 IFR “practice” approach. His words 1/26/2022 1:14:59 PM

KGVQ (NT) +0/-0 Correction. Still LIFR at the time 1/26/2022 1:15:48 PM

Why don’t you check the weather at KGBQ for the time he set up for an +2/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 8:35:32 AM

Is it really an “accident” if the pilot knowingly +0/-0 tuse 1/27/2022 7:53:12 AM

Clearly this is on that pilot. But there are always contributing factors +0/-0 he didn't decouple 1/26/2022 5:41:47 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-7 say wut 1/26/2022 12:44:26 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program (NT) +1/-0 Better than the pilot reading the RFM 1/26/2022 12:45:38 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +5/-1 Dude said 1/26/2022 12:47:50 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-2 true. crashing is not a good look 1/26/2022 1:24:33 PM

So wrong on your perspective +2/-1 Practice approach in VFR-Good 1/26/2022 1:37:48 PM

So wrong on your perspective +0/-1 nobody said he wasn't at fault 1/26/2022 1:45:52 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +2/-1 LOL 1/26/2022 1:48:57 PM

I thought they had BK’s and Agustas at this place (NT) +0/-0 Where they get 429s 1/26/2022 1:55:08 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-1 That’s normal flying 1/26/2022 2:25:49 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-0 Yea 1/26/2022 8:36:42 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-1 ... 1/27/2022 1:15:40 AM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-1 Dumb 1/27/2022 11:16:32 AM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-1 let me help you 1/26/2022 3:58:38 PM

Actually by his statements, the crew statements, and the weather +2/-1 me (with furrowed brow and 1/26/2022 4:40:39 PM

Actually by his statements, the crew statements, and the weather +0/-0 interesting that 1/26/2022 4:49:21 PM

Actually by his statements, the crew statements, and the weather +0/-0 huh 1/26/2022 5:54:57 PM

Pilot states I seen the fog. Pilot continues into it. +4/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 8:37:17 AM

30 years of flying and only (NT) +2/-0 3,000+ hours?!?!?!?! 1/27/2022 12:44:11 AM

30 years of flying and only +0/-3 some people quit flying and 1/27/2022 9:37:19 AM

The 'average' annual flight time in HEMS is about 150 hrs annually. +0/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 10:11:44 AM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-1 Yeah, 1/27/2022 6:38:05 AM

How in the heck did the NTSB classify this as a PART 91 flight? +0/-1 NTSB is useless to get anything right 1/27/2022 8:27:04 AM

better link: +0/-0 Anonymous 1/27/2022 8:28:18 AM

How in the heck did the NTSB classify this as a PART 91 flight? +0/-1 olderendirt 1/27/2022 8:39:28 AM

NOPE, not with medical crewmembers aboard (NT) +0/-1 (or patients). Part 135!! 1/27/2022 9:02:44 AM

NOPE, not with medical crewmembers aboard (NT) +0/-0 here we go 1/27/2022 9:18:38 AM

Are the medical crew "flight crew"? With specific responsibilities in the +0/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 10:04:21 AM

No, they are medical crewmembers! Flight crewmembers are (NT) +0/-1 Pilot, Copilot, Engineer, Navigator 1/27/2022 10:16:36 AM

"No, they are medical crewmembers!" Ooops, my bad. You are correct. Medical +0/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 11:40:37 AM

"No, they are medical crewmembers!" Ooops, my bad. You are correct. Medical +3/-0 14CFR Part 1 1/27/2022 1:13:38 PM

But the wear jackets embroidered with FlightCrew (NT) +0/-0 and tell everyone they are FlightCrew 1/27/2022 2:41:51 PM

"No, they are medical crewmembers!" Ooops, my bad. You are correct. Medical +3/-0 Haa pilot 1/31/2022 7:22:10 PM

Rnav approach error

+4/-0 anony 1/27/2022 10:25:56 AM

Rnav approach error +1/-0 Biggest 1/27/2022 3:31:59 PM

Rnav approach error +3/-0 Ifrgiy 1/27/2022 7:57:14 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-0 FLY BOY 1/28/2022 3:32:29 PM

Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can" (NT) +0/-0 olderendirt 1/28/2022 3:56:11 PM

Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can" +0/-2 we've all heard that a million times 1/28/2022 5:07:01 PM

Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can" +1/-0 You didn’t hear it even once. 1/28/2022 5:14:23 PM

Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can" +0/-1 well biffster 1/28/2022 6:00:59 PM

George Carlin Said: "If black boxes survive air crashes -- why don't they (NT) +3/-0 make the whole plane out of the stuff?" 1/28/2022 5:46:21 PM

This doesn’t look good for this program +0/-0 No 1/31/2022 6:21:03 PM