|
|
||
|
||
| Author: With their environment Date: 1/26/2022 12:11:26 PM +11/-2 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window | ||
So much wrong with this to utilizing NVG's, not checking weather, continuing to fly into the fog, setting up for an IFR approach as a vfr pilot after cancelling flight following, then decoupling the autopilot when they went inadvertent....this is text book failure and everything we train against doing. |
||
| Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use | ||
|
|
||
|
||
 This doesn’t look good for this program
+3/-2 New York Bell 429 crash update 1/26/2022 12:02:56 PM
 This doesn’t look good for this program
+3/-1 how this happens 1/26/2022 12:08:05 PM
Clearly this is on that pilot. But there are always contributing factors
+11/-2 With their environment 1/26/2022 12:11:26 PM
Clearly this is on that pilot. But there are always contributing factors
+0/-2 he didn't 1/26/2022 12:18:19 PM
He or she checked every box of what not to do (NT)
+2/-1 Shouldn’t even have a license 1/26/2022 12:25:11 PM
He or she checked every box of what not to do
+0/-2 accidents happen 1/26/2022 12:40:20 PM
No, they don’t “just” happen. Especially in this accident.
+2/-1 Don’t fool yourself. 1/26/2022 12:43:59 PM
No, they don’t “just” happen. Especially in this accident.
+1/-3 oh boy 1/26/2022 12:46:07 PM
No, they don’t “just” happen. Especially in this accident.
+0/-2 I didn't read the part 1/26/2022 12:47:24 PM
Apparently flying around with scattered clouds about
+0/-0 is IMC to this guy 1/26/2022 12:57:25 PM
Why don’t you check the weather at KGBQ for the time he set up for an
+0/-1 IFR “practice” approach. His words 1/26/2022 1:14:59 PM
KGVQ (NT)
+0/-0 Correction. Still LIFR at the time 1/26/2022 1:15:48 PM
Why don’t you check the weather at KGBQ for the time he set up for an
+2/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 8:35:32 AM
Is it really an “accident” if the pilot knowingly
+0/-0 tuse 1/27/2022 7:53:12 AM
Clearly this is on that pilot. But there are always contributing factors
+0/-0 he didn't decouple 1/26/2022 5:41:47 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-7 say wut 1/26/2022 12:44:26 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program (NT)
+1/-0 Better than the pilot reading the RFM 1/26/2022 12:45:38 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+5/-1 Dude said 1/26/2022 12:47:50 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-2 true. crashing is not a good look 1/26/2022 1:24:33 PM
So wrong on your perspective
+2/-1 Practice approach in VFR-Good 1/26/2022 1:37:48 PM
So wrong on your perspective
+0/-1 nobody said he wasn't at fault 1/26/2022 1:45:52 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+2/-1 LOL 1/26/2022 1:48:57 PM
I thought they had BK’s and Agustas at this place (NT)
+0/-0 Where they get 429s 1/26/2022 1:55:08 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-1 That’s normal flying 1/26/2022 2:25:49 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-0 Yea 1/26/2022 8:36:42 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-1 ... 1/27/2022 1:15:40 AM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-1 Dumb 1/27/2022 11:16:32 AM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-1 let me help you 1/26/2022 3:58:38 PM
Actually by his statements, the crew statements, and the weather
+2/-1 me (with furrowed brow and 1/26/2022 4:40:39 PM
Actually by his statements, the crew statements, and the weather
+0/-0 interesting that 1/26/2022 4:49:21 PM
Actually by his statements, the crew statements, and the weather
+0/-0 huh 1/26/2022 5:54:57 PM
Pilot states I seen the fog. Pilot continues into it.
+4/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 8:37:17 AM
30 years of flying and only (NT)
+2/-0 3,000+ hours?!?!?!?! 1/27/2022 12:44:11 AM
30 years of flying and only
+0/-3 some people quit flying and 1/27/2022 9:37:19 AM
The 'average' annual flight time in HEMS is about 150 hrs annually.
+0/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 10:11:44 AM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-1 Yeah, 1/27/2022 6:38:05 AM
How in the heck did the NTSB classify this as a PART 91 flight?
+0/-1 NTSB is useless to get anything right 1/27/2022 8:27:04 AM
better link:
+0/-0 Anonymous 1/27/2022 8:28:18 AM
How in the heck did the NTSB classify this as a PART 91 flight?
+0/-1 olderendirt 1/27/2022 8:39:28 AM
NOPE, not with medical crewmembers aboard (NT)
+0/-1 (or patients). Part 135!! 1/27/2022 9:02:44 AM
NOPE, not with medical crewmembers aboard (NT)
+0/-0 here we go 1/27/2022 9:18:38 AM
Are the medical crew "flight crew"? With specific responsibilities in the
+0/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 10:04:21 AM
No, they are medical crewmembers! Flight crewmembers are (NT)
+0/-1 Pilot, Copilot, Engineer, Navigator 1/27/2022 10:16:36 AM
"No, they are medical crewmembers!" Ooops, my bad. You are correct. Medical
+0/-0 olderendirt 1/27/2022 11:40:37 AM
"No, they are medical crewmembers!" Ooops, my bad. You are correct. Medical
+3/-0 14CFR Part 1 1/27/2022 1:13:38 PM
But the wear jackets embroidered with FlightCrew (NT)
+0/-0 and tell everyone they are FlightCrew 1/27/2022 2:41:51 PM
"No, they are medical crewmembers!" Ooops, my bad. You are correct. Medical
+3/-0 Haa pilot 1/31/2022 7:22:10 PM
Rnav approach error 
+4/-0 anony 1/27/2022 10:25:56 AM
Rnav approach error
+1/-0 Biggest 1/27/2022 3:31:59 PM
Rnav approach error
+3/-0 Ifrgiy 1/27/2022 7:57:14 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-0 FLY BOY 1/28/2022 3:32:29 PM
Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can" (NT)
+0/-0 olderendirt 1/28/2022 3:56:11 PM
Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can"
+0/-2 we've all heard that a million times 1/28/2022 5:07:01 PM
Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can"
+1/-0 You didn’t hear it even once. 1/28/2022 5:14:23 PM
Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can"
+0/-1 well biffster 1/28/2022 6:00:59 PM
George Carlin Said: "If black boxes survive air crashes -- why don't they (NT)
+3/-0 make the whole plane out of the stuff?" 1/28/2022 5:46:21 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0/-0 No 1/31/2022 6:21:03 PM
|
