Click here to close

New Message Alert

"Crew rest"? NOT mentioned. Also, that's for 135 flying, not Part 91

"Crew rest"? NOT mentioned. Also, that's for 135 flying, not Part 91

Author: well why the hell else would he Date: 11/30/2021 6:25:10 PM +0/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

be bring up crew rest if was 91 you dumb d*ck

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 termination of required crew rest? 11/30/2021 6:43:33 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-1 Musky 11/30/2021 6:51:51 AM

Fair enough +0/-0 Anonymous 11/30/2021 7:13:22 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 Never heard of a scheduled takeoff 11/30/2021 7:20:13 AM

Never heard of it? Lucky you! +1/-1 OP 11/30/2021 7:33:51 AM

Never heard of it? Lucky you! +0/-1 So it has to be part 135 11/30/2021 8:20:08 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +3/-1 It all depends on you.. 11/30/2021 10:41:32 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-2 I am of the opinion 11/30/2021 11:17:40 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 Been scratching for 25 years lol 11/30/2021 12:14:36 PM

No. And if the superviser/management raises issues, find another job. +3/-0 olderendirt 11/30/2021 12:55:01 PM

No. And if the superviser/management raises issues, find another job. +0/-1 the cap on the tranny oil filter 11/30/2021 1:25:24 PM

Old dirt man doesn't know what he's talking about. (NT) +0/-0 Yes it's OK, as long as it's not Part 91 11/30/2021 4:57:22 PM

Old dirt man doesn't know what he's talking about. +0/-0 uh, dude 11/30/2021 5:19:04 PM

Show me "crew rest" in the FARs! (NT) +0/-0 Not very key afterall! 11/30/2021 5:41:51 PM

Show me "crew rest" in the FARs! +0/-0 not that complicated 11/30/2021 5:57:47 PM

"Crew rest"? NOT mentioned. Also, that's for 135 flying, not Part 91 (NT) +0/-0 Was that a pilot asking, or a "crew"? 11/30/2021 6:11:40 PM

"Crew rest"? NOT mentioned. Also, that's for 135 flying, not Part 91 +0/-0 well why the hell else would he 11/30/2021 6:25:10 PM

Because he's trolling you. Read his arbitrary question again! No mention +0/-0 of type of OP or who's "scheduled" 11/30/2021 6:51:50 PM

Because he's trolling you. Read his arbitrary question again! No mention +0/-0 a student pilot has 11/30/2021 8:45:36 PM

Are you sure you're not angling for a promotion. +0/-0 Anonymous 12/1/2021 7:29:31 AM

Details matter! Also true with the question! +0/-0 YES, if OK to schedule takeoff! 12/1/2021 3:41:01 PM

Details matter! Also true with the question! +0/-0 say wut 12/1/2021 3:50:55 PM

Details matter! Also true with the question! (NT) +0/-0 Not the assignment, only the leg 12/1/2021 4:27:24 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +0/-1 Not leg by leg assessments. 12/1/2021 4:56:54 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +0/-0 oh yeah, part 222 12/1/2021 4:59:36 PM

Ask autocorrect about that! Not what was typed (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 12/1/2021 8:10:54 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +3/-1 No Way Has That Reg Ever Been 12/1/2021 6:41:56 PM

Yes, "WAY". The FAA proposed it leg by leg, but dropped it. +0/-0 Anonymous 12/2/2021 8:34:19 AM

Yes, "WAY". The FAA proposed it leg by leg, but dropped it. +0/-0 They are referring directly to in 12/2/2021 12:24:01 PM

NOPE, not for Part 135. You didn't actually read the proposal. It is why +0/-1 FAR 135.263(d) says "assignment" 12/2/2021 1:25:37 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +0/-1 Not leg by leg assessments. 12/1/2021 8:07:32 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +0/-0 he's talking about starting the 12/1/2021 8:22:29 PM

If he's starting the day, start the day! What's the problem? +0/-0 But, that's now what he asked in his... 12/2/2021 8:21:51 AM

"Crew rest"? NOT mentioned. Also, that's for 135 flying, not Part 91 +0/-0 Even flight attendants have 12/1/2021 6:47:47 AM

Not for Part 91 operations, nor for times when its due to reasons (NT) +0/-0 beyond the control of the operator 12/2/2021 12:06:04 PM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 Careless 11/30/2021 5:21:27 PM

happens everyday, and condoned by the FAA (NT) +0/-0 Yup! 12/2/2021 12:06:56 PM

Why are you only allowing for 5 minutes? (NT) +0/-1 Don't you get there early enough? 11/30/2021 5:39:30 PM

Why are you only allowing for 5 minutes? +0/-0 somebody is unfamiliar with 11/30/2021 5:47:22 PM

Huh? What does rest have to do with taking off +0/-0 5 minutes into a duty period when 12/2/2021 12:11:24 PM

Huh? What does rest have to do with taking off +0/-0 You are missing something 12/2/2021 12:15:10 PM

In that case, he takes off as timely as he can performing all +0/-0 the tasks required by the FARs 12/2/2021 12:52:28 PM

Huh? What does rest have to do with taking off +0/-0 uh 12/2/2021 1:13:42 PM

Then, you've probably never worked on one either (NT) +0/-0 It happens often 12/2/2021 3:41:23 PM

Then, you've probably never worked on one either +0/-0 nope, never worked on one 12/2/2021 3:48:45 PM

5he FO can have it all done!!r. Capt arrives, door closes +0/-0 They are underway, checklist starts 12/2/2021 8:44:20 PM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 Does it matter? 12/2/2021 12:16:17 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 anony 12/2/2021 7:55:07 AM

Now we're getting somewhere. +0/-0 Anonymous 12/2/2021 8:05:22 AM

If Med, managers, are worried about T/O time (NT) +0/-0 send by ground 12/3/2021 5:19:44 PM

Is that a theoretical question or a practical question? (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 12/4/2021 6:51:56 PM