Fair enough

New Message Alert

Fair enough

Author: Anonymous Date: 11/30/2021 7:13:22 AM +0/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

This refers to the captain coming off crew rest and doing the flight.

In an operation where the safety program is a joke, and the safety officer is just in charge of being thrown under the bus, the FAA might have cause for concern. I think that landing five minutes before entering crew rest and being scheduled for a takeoff five minutes after crew rest is insufficient time for post-flight and pre-flight duties. With this in mind, I infer nothing.

The question is clear. You can draw your own inferences.

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 termination of required crew rest? 11/30/2021 6:43:33 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-1 Musky 11/30/2021 6:51:51 AM

Fair enough +0/-0 Anonymous 11/30/2021 7:13:22 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 Never heard of a scheduled takeoff 11/30/2021 7:20:13 AM

Never heard of it? Lucky you! +1/-1 OP 11/30/2021 7:33:51 AM

Never heard of it? Lucky you! +0/-1 So it has to be part 135 11/30/2021 8:20:08 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +3/-1 It all depends on you.. 11/30/2021 10:41:32 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-2 I am of the opinion 11/30/2021 11:17:40 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 Been scratching for 25 years lol 11/30/2021 12:14:36 PM

No. And if the superviser/management raises issues, find another job. +3/-0 olderendirt 11/30/2021 12:55:01 PM

No. And if the superviser/management raises issues, find another job. +0/-1 the cap on the tranny oil filter 11/30/2021 1:25:24 PM

Old dirt man doesn't know what he's talking about. (NT) +0/-0 Yes it's OK, as long as it's not Part 91 11/30/2021 4:57:22 PM

Old dirt man doesn't know what he's talking about. +0/-0 uh, dude 11/30/2021 5:19:04 PM

Show me "crew rest" in the FARs! (NT) +0/-0 Not very key afterall! 11/30/2021 5:41:51 PM

Show me "crew rest" in the FARs! +0/-0 not that complicated 11/30/2021 5:57:47 PM

"Crew rest"? NOT mentioned. Also, that's for 135 flying, not Part 91 (NT) +0/-0 Was that a pilot asking, or a "crew"? 11/30/2021 6:11:40 PM

"Crew rest"? NOT mentioned. Also, that's for 135 flying, not Part 91 +0/-0 well why the hell else would he 11/30/2021 6:25:10 PM

Because he's trolling you. Read his arbitrary question again! No mention +0/-0 of type of OP or who's "scheduled" 11/30/2021 6:51:50 PM

Because he's trolling you. Read his arbitrary question again! No mention +0/-0 a student pilot has 11/30/2021 8:45:36 PM

Are you sure you're not angling for a promotion. +0/-0 Anonymous 12/1/2021 7:29:31 AM

Details matter! Also true with the question! +0/-0 YES, if OK to schedule takeoff! 12/1/2021 3:41:01 PM

Details matter! Also true with the question! +0/-0 say wut 12/1/2021 3:50:55 PM

Details matter! Also true with the question! (NT) +0/-0 Not the assignment, only the leg 12/1/2021 4:27:24 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +0/-1 Not leg by leg assessments. 12/1/2021 4:56:54 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +0/-0 oh yeah, part 222 12/1/2021 4:59:36 PM

Ask autocorrect about that! Not what was typed (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 12/1/2021 8:10:54 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +3/-1 No Way Has That Reg Ever Been 12/1/2021 6:41:56 PM

Yes, "WAY". The FAA proposed it leg by leg, but dropped it. +0/-0 Anonymous 12/2/2021 8:34:19 AM

Yes, "WAY". The FAA proposed it leg by leg, but dropped it. +0/-0 They are referring directly to in 12/2/2021 12:24:01 PM

NOPE, not for Part 135. You didn't actually read the proposal. It is why +0/-1 FAR 135.263(d) says "assignment" 12/2/2021 1:25:37 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +0/-1 Not leg by leg assessments. 12/1/2021 8:07:32 PM

Assignment! All legs of the assignment. +0/-0 he's talking about starting the 12/1/2021 8:22:29 PM

If he's starting the day, start the day! What's the problem? +0/-0 But, that's now what he asked in his... 12/2/2021 8:21:51 AM

"Crew rest"? NOT mentioned. Also, that's for 135 flying, not Part 91 +0/-0 Even flight attendants have 12/1/2021 6:47:47 AM

Not for Part 91 operations, nor for times when its due to reasons (NT) +0/-0 beyond the control of the operator 12/2/2021 12:06:04 PM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 Careless 11/30/2021 5:21:27 PM

happens everyday, and condoned by the FAA (NT) +0/-0 Yup! 12/2/2021 12:06:56 PM

Why are you only allowing for 5 minutes? (NT) +0/-1 Don't you get there early enough? 11/30/2021 5:39:30 PM

Why are you only allowing for 5 minutes? +0/-0 somebody is unfamiliar with 11/30/2021 5:47:22 PM

Huh? What does rest have to do with taking off +0/-0 5 minutes into a duty period when 12/2/2021 12:11:24 PM

Huh? What does rest have to do with taking off +0/-0 You are missing something 12/2/2021 12:15:10 PM

In that case, he takes off as timely as he can performing all +0/-0 the tasks required by the FARs 12/2/2021 12:52:28 PM

Huh? What does rest have to do with taking off +0/-0 uh 12/2/2021 1:13:42 PM

Then, you've probably never worked on one either (NT) +0/-0 It happens often 12/2/2021 3:41:23 PM

Then, you've probably never worked on one either +0/-0 nope, never worked on one 12/2/2021 3:48:45 PM

5he FO can have it all done!!r. Capt arrives, door closes +0/-0 They are underway, checklist starts 12/2/2021 8:44:20 PM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 Does it matter? 12/2/2021 12:16:17 AM

Is it OK to have a scheduled takeoff time five minutes after the +0/-0 anony 12/2/2021 7:55:07 AM

Now we're getting somewhere. +0/-0 Anonymous 12/2/2021 8:05:22 AM

If Med, managers, are worried about T/O time (NT) +0/-0 send by ground 12/3/2021 5:19:44 PM

Is that a theoretical question or a practical question? (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 12/4/2021 6:51:56 PM