|
|
||
|
||
| Author: Anonymous Date: 5/28/2021 9:05:44 AM +0/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window | ||
Note, they were cited because theybdid not gove the pilot adequate REST for his next FAR 135 flight assignment, not because he exceeded any DUTY limitation. That's because the Part 91 operation did not demand a required REST period beforehand (because it was Part 91), but the one he came back for did (because it was Part 135). He didn't have the 10 hours of look-back in 24 he needed. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc |
||
| Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use | ||
|
|
||
|
||
|
