Click here to close

New Message Alert

24 - 10 = 14 hrs for PART 135 ops, not PART 91 kos (NT)

24 - 10 = 14 hrs for PART 135 ops, not PART 91 kos (NT)

Author: See Slater (2015) Date: 1/13/2021 12:07:49 PM +0/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

Where in any regulation or interpretation does it say this +0/-0 regarding Part 135 flight planning? 1/13/2021 8:45:12 AM

Where in any regulation or interpretation does it say this

+3/-0 Ok 1/13/2021 9:05:45 AM

"Flight Assignment" is a thing. "14-hour Duty Assignment" is not +5/-0 That's the only confusion here 1/13/2021 9:15:39 AM

"Flight Assignment" is a thing. "14-hour Duty Assignment" is not +1/-1 philofthenorth 1/13/2021 9:29:22 AM

POI s would abide by FAA interpretations: Slater (2015) (NT) +0/-0 and Converse-RedWingAeroplane (2012) 1/13/2021 9:39:45 AM

POI s would abide by FAA interpretations: Slater (2015) +0/-0 And POIs 1/13/2021 10:50:21 AM

Kidd 2017 TRUMPS your Slater 2015 still.... +0/-0 FAA Genera Counsel has already ruled 1/13/2021 10:57:41 AM

Except Kidd 2017 doesn't say anything to support tryout notion that (NT) +0/-0 Tail-end Part 91 ops are not ALLOWED 1/13/2021 11:43:51 AM

Not anything to do with the letter you reference from Union..... (NT) +0/-0 Quit whining Mayors. 1/13/2021 11:46:08 AM

Exactly, and since ther isn't any other FAA interpretation (NT) +0/-0 dealing with tail-end Part 91 ops .... 1/13/2021 2:42:06 PM

Exactly, and since ther isn't any other FAA interpretation (NT) +0/-0 dealing with tail-end Part 91 ops .... 1/13/2021 2:42:08 PM

POI s would abide by FAA interpretations: Slater (2015) +0/-0 POI POS 1/13/2021 2:55:53 PM

"Flight Assignment" is a thing. "14-hour Duty Assignment" is not +1/-0 Yeah, sure. 1/13/2021 10:48:38 AM

�DUTY PERIOD� is defined as starting and finishing work for certificate +0/-0 holder. Nothing in 135 regs LIMITING it 1/13/2021 11:52:31 AM

So you are now speculating on arbitrary terms? IOWs, tber (NT) +0/-0 Isn't anything supporting it directly 1/13/2021 11:46:10 AM

So you are saying �Duty Period� is NOT defined in FARs or GOM? (NT) +0/-0 You can�t be that ignorant 1/13/2021 11:47:01 AM

Shiw everyone in the GARs where is defines a +0/-0 "Duty Period Assignment" 1/13/2021 11:55:22 AM

Obviously FAR! (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 1/13/2021 1:43:14 PM

How do you �Shiw� anyone, anything? (NT) +0/-0 Maybe this is the problem for you 1/13/2021 12:03:26 PM

*Show, obviously. If you are so either to read thing int FAR that aren't s (NT) +0/-0 You should have figured that out easily 1/13/2021 1:33:08 PM

*eager. *into (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 1/13/2021 2:31:57 PM

FAR�s very clearly define distinct differences between flight assignment (NT) +0/-0 and DUTY PERIOD...read much? 1/13/2021 10:14:48 AM

Right! And nowhere does it limit a DUTY PERIOD to 14hrs (NT) +0/-0 It limits a FLIGHT ASSIGNMENT 1/13/2021 11:57:33 AM

Wrong. GOM and FAR along with several legal interpa for �planning� purposes +0/-0 Not to mention if 1/13/2021 12:23:48 PM

Not a single FAR or interpretation says that! None. +0/-0 Post them if otherwise! 1/13/2021 1:38:05 PM

If a pilot shows he ended his Part 135 segments within 14 hrs (NT) +0/-0 he is not in violation of 135.267 1/13/2021 1:58:14 PM

Agreed. Again, you miss the point (NT) +0/-0 Ignorant or stupid...only 1 1/13/2021 2:06:19 PM

What point? That you will be violated for NOT violating (NT) +0/-0 the FARs? Was that your point? 1/13/2021 2:34:09 PM

If not on rest, but acting on directive of certificate holder are you still (NT) +0/-0 On duty? Simple yes or no 1/13/2021 10:18:53 AM

Yes, but not limited to 14 hours. Just doesn't count as REST +0/-0 Just can't plan to Part 135 after 14 hrs 1/13/2021 11:59:48 AM

Yes, but not limited to 14 hours. Just doesn't count as REST (NT) +0/-0 FAA says start 135, end 135 1/13/2021 12:02:45 PM

No it doesn't, what it says is start a flight assignment 135, end it 135. (NT) +0/-0 But deny tail end Part 91 reassignment 1/13/2021 1:40:38 PM

Ie, see Slater 2015 (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 1/13/2021 1:41:47 PM

Where in any regulation or interpretation does it say this +2/-0 If you 1/13/2021 10:45:29 AM

Using your advice, reading the rules DON'T demand a pilot fly back to base, (NT) +0/-0 deadhead, or can't Part 91 after 14 hrs 1/13/2021 12:05:56 PM

Using your advice, reading the rules DON'T demand a pilot fly back to base, +1/-0 You bring up 1/13/2021 3:55:39 PM

Someone is saying it VIOLATES regulations. That's cut and dry +0/-0 falsehoods. Regs don't say you must 1/13/2021 4:09:42 PM

Someone is saying it VIOLATES regulations. That's cut and dry +0/-0 I'm 1/14/2021 3:26:26 PM

Part 91 Corporate gigs often exceed 14hrs in a day (NT) +0/-0 operating that way for decades! 1/17/2021 12:19:48 AM

Where in any regulation or interpretation does it say this +0/-0 SENTENCE OF THE DAY 1/14/2021 1:47:38 AM

24 - 10 = 14 hrs for PART 135 ops, not PART 91 kos (NT) +0/-0 See Slater (2015) 1/13/2021 12:07:49 PM

Cite them! (NT) +0/-0 You never do! 1/13/2021 1:28:59 PM

24 - 10 = 14 hrs for PART 135 ops, not PART 91 kos +0/-0 True, 1/13/2021 3:57:54 PM

Why would it need to say you can mix them?? (NT) +0/-0 Why can't you is the question! 1/13/2021 9:37:55 PM

Feds do what they want and leave you +0/-0 to pick up the pieces 1/13/2021 9:32:14 PM

You call their boss and ask WTH FARs are universally applied. (NT) +0/-0 Not subject to individual fifedomes 1/13/2021 9:46:07 PM

You call their boss and ask WTH FARs are universally applied. +0/-0 OG 1/13/2021 10:47:50 PM

Slater (2015), Converse-RedWingAeroplane (2012) (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 1/14/2021 8:26:59 AM

Part 91 Flight assignment after Part 135 Flight Assignment (NT) +0/-0 First before 14 hrs, second wherever 1/14/2021 8:29:52 AM

Feds do what they want and leave you +1/-0 No one 1/14/2021 3:37:48 PM

Where in any regulation or interpretation does it say this +1/-1 Oooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhh....... 1/14/2021 4:09:00 PM

yeah +0/-0 Anonymous 1/17/2021 1:09:21 AM

oh and let me save u the trouble +0/-0 Anonymous 1/17/2021 1:10:46 AM